Impact of model developments on present and future simulations of permafrost in a global land-surface model

被引:52
|
作者
Chadburn, S. E. [1 ]
Burke, E. J. [2 ]
Essery, R. L. H. [3 ]
Boike, J. [4 ]
Langer, M. [4 ,5 ]
Heikenfeld, M. [4 ,6 ]
Cox, P. M. [1 ]
Friedlingstein, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Earth Syst Sci, Exeter EX4 4QE, Devon, England
[2] Met Off, Hadley Ctr, Exeter EX1 3PB, Devon, England
[3] Grant Inst, Edinburgh EH9 3FE, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Helmholtz Ctr Polar & Marine Res AWI, Alfred Wegener Inst, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[5] Lab Glaciol & Geophys Environm, F-38402 St Martin Dheres, France
[6] Univ Oxford, Dept Phys, Atmospher Ocean & Planetary Phys, Oxford OX1 3PU, England
来源
CRYOSPHERE | 2015年 / 9卷 / 04期
关键词
HIGH-LATITUDE; CARBON RELEASE; CLIMATE; SOIL; JULES; REPRESENTATION; ENVIRONMENT; THAW; FEEDBACKS; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.5194/tc-9-1505-2015
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
There is a large amount of organic carbon stored in permafrost in the northern high latitudes, which may become vulnerable to microbial decomposition under future climate warming. In order to estimate this potential carbon-climate feedback it is necessary to correctly simulate the physical dynamics of permafrost within global Earth system models (ESMs) and to determine the rate at which it will thaw. Additional new processes within JULES, the land-surface scheme of the UK ESM (UKESM), include a representation of organic soils, moss and bedrock and a modification to the snow scheme; the sensitivity of permafrost to these new developments is investigated in this study. The impact of a higher vertical soil resolution and deeper soil column is also considered. Evaluation against a large group of sites shows the annual cycle of soil temperatures is approximately 25% too large in the standard JULES version, but this error is corrected by the model improvements, in particular by deeper soil, organic soils, moss and the modified snow scheme. A comparison with active layer monitoring sites shows that the active layer is on average just over 1 m too deep in the standard model version, and this bias is reduced by 70 cm in the improved version. Increasing the soil vertical resolution allows the full range of active layer depths to be simulated; by contrast, with a poorly resolved soil at least 50% of the permafrost area has a maximum thaw depth at the centre of the bottom soil layer. Thus all the model modifications are seen to improve the permafrost simulations. Historical permafrost area corresponds fairly well to observations in all simulations, covering an area between 14 and 19 million km(2). Simulations under two future climate scenarios show a reduced sensitivity of permafrost degradation to temperature, with the near-surface permafrost loss per degree of warming reduced from 1.5 million km(2) degrees C-1 in the standard version of JULES to between 1.1 and 1.2 million km(2) degrees C-1 in the new model version. However, the near-surface permafrost area is still projected to approximately half by the end of the 21st century under the RCP8.5 scenario.
引用
收藏
页码:1505 / 1521
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Model improvement and future projection of permafrost processes in a global land surface model
    Yokohata, Tokuta
    Saito, Kazuyuki
    Takata, Kumiko
    Nitta, Tomoko
    Satoh, Yusuke
    Hajima, Tomohiro
    Sueyoshi, Tetsuo
    Iwahana, Go
    [J]. PROGRESS IN EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE, 2020, 7 (01)
  • [2] Model improvement and future projection of permafrost processes in a global land surface model
    Tokuta Yokohata
    Kazuyuki Saito
    Kumiko Takata
    Tomoko Nitta
    Yusuke Satoh
    Tomohiro Hajima
    Tetsuo Sueyoshi
    Go Iwahana
    [J]. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, 7
  • [3] An improved representation of physical permafrost dynamics in the JULES land-surface model
    Chadburn, S.
    Burke, E.
    Essery, R.
    Boike, J.
    Langer, M.
    Heikenfeld, M.
    Cox, P.
    Friedlingstein, P.
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 8 (05) : 1493 - 1508
  • [4] Developments in the MOSES 2 land-surface model for PILPS 2e
    Essery, R
    Clark, DB
    [J]. GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2003, 38 (1-2) : 161 - 164
  • [5] The land-surface flux model PROGSURF
    Acs, F
    Hantel, M
    [J]. GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 1998, 19 (1-4) : 19 - 34
  • [6] Assimilation of surface temperature in a land-surface model
    Kumar, P
    Kaleita, AL
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING AND HYDROLOGY 2000, 2001, (267): : 197 - 201
  • [7] A GLOBAL CLIMATE MODEL (GENESIS) WITH A LAND-SURFACE TRANSFER SCHEME (LSX) .1. PRESENT CLIMATE SIMULATION
    THOMPSON, SL
    POLLARD, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 1995, 8 (04) : 732 - 761
  • [8] Land-surface model development for the GISS GCM
    Rosenzweig, C
    Abramopoulos, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 1997, 10 (08) : 2040 - 2054
  • [9] River basin hydrology in a global off-line land-surface model
    Bosilovich, MG
    Yang, RH
    Houser, PR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D16) : 19661 - 19673
  • [10] Exploring the transferability of a land-surface hydrology model
    Devonec, E
    Barros, AP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2002, 265 (1-4) : 258 - 282