Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction offers an improvisation over conventional immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization for ascertaining Her2 status of breast cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Suryavanshi, Moushumi [1 ]
Jaipuria, Jiten [2 ]
Mehta, Anurag [1 ]
Kumar, Dushyant [1 ]
Panigrahi, Manoj Kumar [1 ]
Verma, Haristuti [1 ]
Saifi, Mumtaz [1 ]
Sharma, Sanjeev [1 ]
Tandon, Simran [3 ]
Doval, Dinesh Chandra [1 ]
Das, Bhudev C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Rajiv Gandhi Canc Inst & Res Ctr, New Delhi, India
[2] Rajiv Gandhi Canc Inst & Res Ctr, Dept Urogynaeoncol, New Delhi, India
[3] Amity Univ, Amity Inst Mol Med & Stem Cell Res, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Breast cancer; droplet digital polymerase chain reaction; fluorescent in situ hybridization; formalin fixed paraffin embedded; Her2; immunohistochemistry; RNA; PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED BREAST; REAL-TIME PCR; GENE AMPLIFICATION; MESSENGER-RNA; AMERICAN SOCIETY; QUANTITATIVE PCR; HER-2/NEU; EXPRESSION; CARCINOMA; RECEPTOR;
D O I
10.4103/sajc.sajc_344_18
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (DDPCR) is a recent modality for detecting Her2 expression which is quantitative, cheaper, easier to standardize, and free from interobserver variation. Purpose:The purpose of this study is to incorporate DDPCR in the current diagnostic paradigm with clinical benefit.Materials and Methods: Fifty-four consecutive patients were tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), and DDPCR. With FISH result as gold standard, receiver operating characteristic curves for DDPCR ratio were analyzed to label Her2-negative, equivocal, and positive cases as DDPCR score 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Proportion of patients labeled unequivocally as Her2 positive or negative was defined to have "clinically benefitted" from the test. Drawing parallel to inter-relationships between DDPCR,IHC, and FISH in the test cohort,four diagnostic pathways were defined - (1) initial IHC followed by FISH, (2) initial DDPCR followed by FISH, (3) initial IHC followed by DDPCR followed by FISH, and (4) initial DDPCR followed by IHC followed by FISH. Results: Clinical benefit of DDPCR as an initial test in the test cohort was 57%, while it was 65% if used as a second-line test among those with an initial inconclusive IHC result. Sensitivity analysis in the simulation cohort revealed that if DDPCR cost was >0.6 times the cost of IHC, then a three-step pathway with DDPCR upfront would near certainly prove most cost beneficial. If DDPCR cost was >0.6 but >= 2 times the cost of IHC, then a three-step pathway with DDPCR as second-line test had a higher probability to prove most cost beneficial. If DDPCR cost was >2 times the cost of IHC, then conventional pathway had a higher probability to prove most cost-effective. Conclusion: Incorporating DDPCR in the current clinical diagnostic paradigm has the potential to improve its cost-effectiveness and benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Determination of the HER2 amplification status by in situ fluorescent hybridization and concordance with immunohistochemistry for breast cancer samples in Colombia
    Plata, Adriana
    Torres, Maria Mercedes
    Lopez, Rocio
    Andrade, Rafael E.
    COLOMBIA MEDICA, 2013, 44 (02): : 108 - 114
  • [2] Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) vs immunohistochemistry (IHC) for determination of Her2/neu status in breast cancer.
    Jimenez, RE
    Wallis, T
    Tabaczka, P
    Visscher, DW
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1999, 79 (01) : 23A - 23A
  • [3] Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization As a Primary Test for HER2 Status in Breast Cancer: Controversies
    Arena, Vincenzo
    Pennacchia, Ilaria
    Monego, Giovanni
    Carbone, Arnaldo
    Capelli, Arnaldo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (05) : E83 - E84
  • [4] HER2 status in invasive breast cancer: Immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in-situ hybridization and chromogenic in-situ hybridization
    Shirsat, Hemlata S.
    Epari, Sridhar
    Shet, Tanuja
    Bagal, Rajani
    Hawaldar, Rohini
    Desai, Sangeeta B.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 55 (02) : 175 - 179
  • [5] Evaluation of HER2 gene status in breast cancer by chromogenic in situ hybridization:: Comparison with immunohistochemistry
    Kounelis, S
    Kapranos, N
    Malamos, N
    Kouri-Bairaktari, E
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 25 (2A) : 939 - 946
  • [6] Her2/neu amplification in breast carcinoma: Comparison of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)
    Smolkin, MB
    Mahadevia, P
    Vuolo, M
    Ramesh, KH
    Cannizzaro, L
    Ratech, H
    Schultz, C
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2003, 16 (01) : 48A - 48A
  • [7] Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization As a Primary Test for HER2 Status in Breast Cancer: Controversies Reply
    Sauter, Guido
    Lee, James A.
    Slamon, Dennis J.
    Press, Michael F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (05) : E85 - E88
  • [8] Correlation of In Situ HER2 RNA Expression With HER2 Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Categories in Breast Cancer
    Tseng, Yu-Fen
    Li, Yu-Chia
    Lee, Yi-Hsuan
    Hu, Hsiang-We
    Zhang, Man-San
    Hung, Tze-Chun
    Lien, Huang-Chun
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2024, 148 (03) : e48 - e56
  • [9] HER2 Status by Standardized Immunohistochemistry and Silver-Enhanced In Situ Hybridization in Korean Breast Cancer
    Bae, Young Kyung
    Gong, Gyungyub
    Kang, Jun
    Lee, Ahwon
    Cho, Eun Yoon
    Lee, Ji Shin
    Suh, Kwang-Sun
    Lee, Dong Wha
    Jung, Woo Hee
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2012, 15 (04) : 381 - 387
  • [10] Changes in HER2 Amplification Status for Breast Cancer Patients After Immunohistochemistry Directed In Situ Hybridization
    Beech, Cameron
    Wilcock, Diane M.
    Moore, Kristina H.
    Rowe, Leslie
    Mahlow, Jonathan
    Jedrzkiewicz, Jolanta
    Cleary, Allison S.
    Lomo, Lesley
    Ruano, Ana L.
    Gering, Maarika
    Bradshaw, Derek
    Maughan, Meghan
    Tran, Phuong
    Davis, Richard
    Affolter, Kajsa
    Albertson, Daniel J.
    Adelhardt, Parisa
    Kim, Jongtaek
    Coleman, Joshua F.
    Deftereos, Georgios
    Gulbahce, Evin H.
    Sirohi, Deepika
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2025, 33 (02) : 91 - 102