A Computational Identification Method for GPI-Anchored Proteins by Artificial Neural Network

被引:3
|
作者
Mukai, Yuri [1 ]
Tanaka, Hirotaka [1 ]
Yoshizawa, Masao [1 ]
Oura, Osamu [1 ,2 ]
Sasaki, Takanori [1 ]
Ikeda, Masami [3 ]
机构
[1] Meiji Univ, Dept Elect & Bioinformat, Sch Sci & Technol, Tama Ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 2148571, Japan
[2] Keio Univ, Dept Informat & Comp Sci, Sch Sci & Technol, Kohoku Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2238522, Japan
[3] Waseda Univ, Consolidated Res Inst Adv Sci & Med Care ASMeW, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1620041, Japan
基金
日本科学技术振兴机构;
关键词
Back-propagation artificial neural network (BP-ANN); discrimination; GPI-anchored protein (GPI-AP); GPI attachment signal; position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM); post-translational modification; PRION PROTEIN; PHOSPHOLIPASE-C; CELL-MEMBRANE; PREDICTION; RELEASE;
D O I
10.2174/157489312800604390
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The attachment of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) is one of the most important post-translational modifications of proteins and plays an important role in promoting biochemical activities in eukaryotic cells. GPI-anchored proteins (GPI-APs) are characterized by GPI-anchor attachment signals of hydrophobic residues and small residues near the GPI-anchoring site (omega-site). Here, we describe a new method for predicting GPI-APs based on hydropathy profiles and position-specific scores (PSSs) in combination with the back propagation artificial neural network (BP-ANN). First, the sequences of GPI-APs and negative controls were aligned according to residue size in the C-terminal region and the position-specific amino acid propensities were analyzed according to their alignment positions. Next, PSSs were created using the amino acid propensities of GPI-APs and the negative controls, and BP-ANN with a three-layered structure was trained by the PSSs. The accuracy of discriminating GPI-APs from the negative controls was evaluated in a 4-fold cross-validation test and GPI-APs were detected with 92.9% sensitivity and 94.8% specificity. This result shows that our method can predict GPI-APs with high accuracy and a combination of PSSs and BP-ANN can effectively discriminate GPI-APs.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 131
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Computational Protocol for Screening GPI-anchored Proteins
    Cao, Wei
    Sumikoshi, Kazuya
    Terada, Tohru
    Nakamura, Shugo
    Kitamoto, Katsuhiko
    Shimizu, Kentaro
    BIOINFORMATICS AND COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5462 : 164 - +
  • [2] Computational prediction of GPI modification sites in GPI-anchored proteins
    Tanaka, H.
    Sasaki, T.
    Mukai, Y.
    FEBS JOURNAL, 2012, 279 : 250 - 250
  • [3] Prediction of GPI-anchored proteins with pointer neural networks
    Gislason, Magnus Halldor
    Nielsen, Henrik
    Armenteros, Jose Juan Almagro
    Johansen, Alexander Rosenberg
    CURRENT RESEARCH IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 3 : 6 - 13
  • [4] Sorting GPI-anchored proteins
    Satyajit Mayor
    Howard Riezman
    Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2004, 5 : 110 - 120
  • [5] Sorting GPI-anchored proteins
    Mayor, S
    Riezman, H
    NATURE REVIEWS MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY, 2004, 5 (02) : 110 - 120
  • [6] A CONVENIENT METHOD FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND EXPRESSION OF GPI-ANCHORED PROTEINS
    HARRISON, PT
    HUTCHINSON, MJ
    ALLEN, JM
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1994, 22 (18) : 3813 - 3814
  • [7] Biosynthesis of GPI-anchored proteins.
    Ferguson, MAJ
    FASEB JOURNAL, 1997, 11 (09): : A859 - A859
  • [8] Intracellular transport of GPI-anchored proteins
    Muñiz, M
    Riezman, H
    EMBO JOURNAL, 2000, 19 (01): : 10 - 15
  • [9] GPI-anchored proteins at the node of Ranvier
    Labasque, Marilyne
    Faivre-Sarrailh, Catherine
    FEBS LETTERS, 2010, 584 (09) : 1787 - 1792
  • [10] Computational approach for identification and characterization of GPI-anchored peptides in proteomics experiments
    Omaetxebarria, Miren J.
    Elortza, Felix
    Rodriguez-Suarez, Eva
    Aloria, Kerman
    Arizmendi, Jesus M.
    Jensen, Ole N.
    Matthiesen, Rune
    PROTEOMICS, 2007, 7 (12) : 1951 - 1960