Ascochyta blight development on a new winter pea genotype highly reactive to photoperiod under field conditions

被引:5
|
作者
Le May, C. [1 ]
Jumel, S. [1 ]
Schoeny, A. [2 ]
Tivoli, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rennes 1, INRA, AGROCAMPUS Ouest, UMR 1099 Bi03P, F-35653 Domaine De La Motte, Le Rheu, France
[2] INRA, UR Pathol Vegetale 407, F-84143 Montfavet, France
关键词
Cultural practices; Epidemiology; Pedoclimatic conditions; Pisum sativum; Sowing dates; Yield losses; MYCOSPHAERELLA-PINODES; RESISTANCE; VALIDATION; MANAGEMENT; ASCOSPORES; INFECTION; RABIEI; ROT;
D O I
10.1016/j.fcr.2008.10.004
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Winter pea suffers from two main types of damage, due to the length of its cycle and climatic conditions (rainfall periods, leaf wetness duration and frost periods): frost and ascochyta blight (Mycosphaerella pinodes). New winter lines resistant to frost (later flowering varieties) are being bred. They can be sown early in autumn, lengthening the crop cycle and thereby increasing target yields. We analysed the reaction of this new type of winter pea (Hr genotype) to ascochyta blight under field conditions, by comparing epidemic disease development on this genotype with that on the classical cultivars Cheyenne and Dove. We also assessed the effect of sowing date (mid-September, mid-October) on ascochyta blight on these genotypes. Field experiments were carried out at five locations (Dijon, Estrees-Mons, Maisse, Rennes, Toulouse). Disease development, assessed on stipules and stems, differed between experimental locations, ranging from mild to very severe epidemics. Disease levels were highest for the first sowing date for each genotype. The Hr genotype had the lowest level of disease at each experimental site. Ascochyta blight was less affected by sowing date in the Hr genotype than in Cheyenne and Dove. Disease affected seed yield differently in the three genotypes. These results have potential implications for the management of disease on winter pea. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 38
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Control of ascochyta blight (Ascochyta complex) in pea under Lithuanian conditions
    Cesnuleviciene, Ruta
    Gaurilcikiene, Irena
    Ramanauskiene, Jurate
    [J]. ZEMDIRBYSTE-AGRICULTURE, 2014, 101 (01) : 101 - 108
  • [2] Effect of pea canopy architecture on microclimate and consequences on ascochyta blight infection under field conditions
    Benjamin Richard
    François Bussière
    Christophe Langrume
    François Rouault
    Stéphane Jumel
    Robert Faivre
    Bernard Tivoli
    [J]. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2013, 135 : 509 - 524
  • [3] Effect of pea canopy architecture on microclimate and consequences on ascochyta blight infection under field conditions
    Richard, Benjamin
    Bussiere, Francois
    Langrume, Christophe
    Rouault, Francois
    Jumel, Stephane
    Faivre, Robert
    Tivoli, Bernard
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2013, 135 (03) : 509 - 524
  • [4] The susceptibility of pea (Pisum sativum L.) to ascochyta blight under Lithuanian conditions
    Gaurilcikiene, Irma
    Cesnuleviciene, Ruta
    [J]. ZEMDIRBYSTE-AGRICULTURE, 2013, 100 (03) : 283 - 288
  • [5] Effect of Ascochyta blight (Mycosphaerella pinodes) on yield components of single pea (Pisum sativum) plants under field conditions
    Tivoli, B
    Beasse, C
    Lemarchand, E
    Masson, E
    [J]. ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1996, 129 (02) : 207 - 216
  • [6] SCREENING FOR ASCOCHYTA BLIGHT RESISTANCE IN CHICKPEA UNDER CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT AND FIELD CONDITIONS
    HAWARE, MP
    VANRHEENEN, HA
    PRASAD, NSS
    [J]. PLANT DISEASE, 1995, 79 (02) : 132 - 135
  • [7] Effect of pea plant architecture on spatiotemporal epidemic development of ascochyta blight (Mycosphaerella pinodes) in the field
    Le May, C.
    Ney, B.
    Lemarchand, E.
    Schoeny, A.
    Tivoli, B.
    [J]. PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2009, 58 (02) : 332 - 343
  • [8] Efficacy of fungicides, plant extracts and biocontrol agents against Ascochyta blight (Ascochyta rabiei) of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under field conditions
    Ahmad, Salman
    Khan, Muhammad Aslam
    Ahmad, Irfan
    Iqbal, Zafar
    Ashraf, Ejaz
    Atiq, Muhammad
    Ali, Yasir
    Naseer, Saima
    [J]. PLANT SCIENCE TODAY, 2021, 8 (02): : 255 - 262
  • [9] Differential responses to pea bacterial blight in stems, leaves and pods under glasshouse and field conditions
    Elvira-Recuenco, M
    Bevan, JR
    Taylor, JD
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2003, 109 (06) : 555 - 564
  • [10] EFFECTS OF SEED INFECTION BY ASCOCHYTA SPP, FUNGICIDE SEED TREATMENT, AND CULTIVAR ON YIELD PARAMETERS OF FIELD PEA UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS
    HWANG, SF
    LOPETINSKY, K
    EVANS, IR
    [J]. CANADIAN PLANT DISEASE SURVEY, 1991, 71 (02): : 169 - 172