Prognostic relevance of a novel TNM classification system for upper gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

被引:331
|
作者
Pape, Ulrich-Frank [1 ]
Jann, Henning [1 ]
Mueller-Nordhorn, Jacqueline [2 ]
Bockelbrink, Angelina [2 ]
Berndt, Uta [1 ]
Willich, Stefan N. [2 ]
Koch, Martin [3 ]
Roecken, Christoph [3 ]
Rindi, Guido [4 ]
Wiedenmann, Bertram [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Berlin, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Charite Campus Virchow Klinikum, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Med Berlin, Inst Social Med Epidemiol & Hlth Econ, Charite Campus Mitte, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Med Berlin, Inst Pathol, Charite Campus Mitte, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[4] Univ Parma, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, I-43100 Parma, Italy
关键词
neuroendocrine tumor; foregut; TNM classification; staging; grading; prognosis; survival;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.23549
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) system comprise a rare but challenging group of malignant neoplasms and occur at virtually any site of the GEP system. In 2006, a new TNM classification system was proposed for the staging and grading of upper GEP NETs. METHODS. The prognostic relevance of the TNM classification system was analyzed retrospectively in 202 patients from a referral center with histologically proven foregut NET. Patients were classified according to previous classification systems and the TNM classification. Survival data were acquired and statistical analyses were performed by using log-rank and Cox regression testing. RESULTS. Primary tumors were gastric (n = 48), duodenal (n = 23), and pancreatic (n = 131). During the observation period, 21% of patients died. The overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 75% and 64%, respectively. Previous classification systems discriminated between low-grade and high-grade malignant NETs but did not allow further prognostic differentiation. In contrast, the proposed TNM classification was able to differentiate significantly between different tumor stages (stages I-III vs stage IV; P < .01) and cellular proliferation rates according to Ki-67 labeling (grade I vs grade 2, P = .04; grade I vs grade 3 and grade 2 vs grade 3, P < .01). Cox regression analysis confirmed an increased risk of reduced survival for patients with stage III or IV NET and grade 2 or 3 NET. CONCLUSIONS. The current results demonstrated the prognostic relevance of the newly proposed TNM classification system for foregut NETs with statistical significance for the subgroups of both the staging classification and the grading system. Thus, the new classification system provides a valid and powerful tool for prognostic stratification of GEP NETs in clinical practice and research.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 265
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prognostic relevance of the novel TNM-classification system for neuroendocrine tumors of foregut origin
    Pape, U.
    Jann, H.
    Berndt, U.
    Wiedenmann, B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [2] Validation of prognostic relevance of the new TNM-classification system for neuroendocrine tumors of foregut origin
    Pape, Ulrich-Frank
    Jann, Henning
    Berndt, Uta
    Wiedenmann, Bertram H.
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 132 (04) : A310 - A310
  • [3] Neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system - Classification and diagnosis
    Tiling, N
    Ricke, J
    Wiedenmann, B
    [J]. INTERNIST, 2002, 43 (02): : 210 - +
  • [4] Classification of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Perren, Aurel
    Schmitt, Anja
    Komminoth, Paul
    Anlauf, Martin
    Kloeppel, Guenter
    [J]. VISZERALMEDIZIN, 2010, 26 (04): : 234 - 240
  • [5] Prognostic Relevance of a Novel AJCC Staging Classification for Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Pancreas
    Strosberg, Jonathan
    Cheema, Asima
    Weber, Jill
    Coppola, Domenico
    Kvols, Larry
    [J]. PANCREAS, 2011, 40 (02) : 332 - 333
  • [6] Prognostic relevance of a novel AJCC staging classification for neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas
    Strosberg, J. R.
    Cheema, A.
    Weber, J.
    Kvols, L. K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (04)
  • [7] Prognostic Factors in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Srirajaskanthan, R.
    Toumpanakis, C.
    Desai, K.
    Warner, B.
    Subash, S.
    Caplin, M. E.
    [J]. NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2009, 90 (01) : 135 - 135
  • [8] Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Diagnosis and Classification
    Kunz, Pamela L.
    [J]. CLINICAL ADVANCES IN HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY, 2015, 13 (05) : 4 - 6
  • [9] Neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system -: reevaluation using the Capella classification
    Brüwer, M
    Pahlov-Nejad, T
    Herbst, H
    Senninger, N
    Schürmann, G
    [J]. ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2003, 128 (08): : 656 - 662
  • [10] Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Stevenson, Ryan
    Libutti, Steven K.
    Saif, Muhammad Wasif
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PANCREAS, 2013, 14 (02): : 155 - 157