Measuring the impact of air quality related interventions

被引:1
|
作者
Ropkins, Karl [1 ]
Tate, James E. [1 ]
Walker, Anthony [2 ,3 ]
Clark, Tony [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Inst Transport Studies, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Dept Transportat, Joint Air Qual Unit, Marsham St, London SW1P 4DF, England
[3] Dept Environm Food & Rural Affairs, Marsham St, London SW1P 4DF, England
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-ATMOSPHERES | 2022年 / 2卷 / 03期
关键词
SECONDARY POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS; LOW-EMISSION ZONES; CHANGE-POINT; REGRESSION; DIESEL; TIME; IMPLEMENTATION; LONDON; PM10; NOX;
D O I
10.1039/d1ea00073j
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As part of air quality management plans, administrative authorities commonly implement interventions, such as Low Emission Zones (LEZs) and Clean Air Zones (CAZs), to improve air quality. The associated benefits are often difficult to quantify due to the high variability in ambient time-series measurements and influence of contributions from meteorology, background and other emission sources. Break-point techniques have previously been used on their own to detect large changes, and in combination with deseasonalisation and deweathering methods to detect smaller changes. However, getting down to the detection limits needed to measure change at the levels predicted for most contemporary air quality interventions remains a challenge, as does the conversion of such higher-level analytical techniques into tools that are suitable for routine use by those tasked with the evaluation of interventions. Here, methods are presented that incorporate background subtraction to improve sensitivity and confidently quantify changes not readily detected in initial air quality time-series. Applied to air quality data collected in Leeds in the UK, the methods indicate a general reduction in the local NO2 contribution across the studied period, 01 January 2015 to 31 January 2019, but also superimposed on that two discrete reductions: the first 2.4 mg m(-3) (0.03 to -4.8 mg m(-3); 95% confidence) in late 2015, and a second of 3.6 mg m(-3) (1.2-6.1 mg m(-3); 95% confidence), equivalent to a 12% (4% to 21%; 95% confidence) reduction in ambient air that coincides with the period when the local 2018 bus fleet was upgraded to cleaner Euro VI vehicles.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 516
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing the impact of transport interventions on air quality
    Pitt, J.
    Jones, G.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-MUNICIPAL ENGINEER, 2006, 159 (04) : 211 - 217
  • [2] The impact of pharmacist interventions on health-related quality of life
    Pickard, AS
    Johnson, JA
    Farris, KB
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1999, 33 (11) : 1167 - 1172
  • [3] Air pollution: impact and interventions
    Gautam, Deepak
    Bolia, Nomesh B.
    AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2020, 13 (02): : 209 - 223
  • [4] Air pollution: impact and interventions
    Deepak Gautam
    Nomesh B. Bolia
    Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2020, 13 : 209 - 223
  • [5] Status of measuring air quality
    TOKIWA Y
    MUELLER PK
    Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1971, 14 (06): : 10 - 19
  • [6] STATUS OF MEASURING AIR QUALITY
    TOKIWA, Y
    MUELLER, PK
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 1971, 14 (06): : 10 - &
  • [7] THE IMPACT OF TRAFFIC RELATED POLLUTION ON AIR QUALITY IN SIBIU REGION
    Petrescu, Valentin
    Ciudin, Rodica
    Isarie, Claudiu
    Cioca, Lucian Ionel
    Trif, Bogdan
    Nederita, Victor
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 14 (11): : 2637 - 2642
  • [8] Methodology for Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life Impact of Disasters
    Neyman, G.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 80 (04) : S27 - S27
  • [9] Evaluating the effectiveness of air quality interventions
    van Erp, Annemoon M. M.
    O'Keefe, Robert
    Cohen, Aaron J.
    Warren, Jane
    JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART A-CURRENT ISSUES, 2008, 71 (9-10): : 583 - 587
  • [10] Statistical assessment of air quality interventions
    Alessandro Fassò
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2013, 27 : 1651 - 1660