Queensland Lung Cancer Screening Study: rationale, design and methods

被引:18
|
作者
Marshall, H. M. [1 ,4 ]
Bowman, R. V. [1 ,4 ]
Crossin, J. [2 ]
Lau, M. A. [2 ]
Slaughter, R. E. [2 ]
Passmore, L. H. [1 ]
McCaul, E. M. [1 ]
Courtney, D. A. [1 ]
Windsor, M. N. [3 ]
Yang, I. A. [1 ,4 ]
Smith, I. R. [5 ]
Keir, B. J. [6 ]
Hayes, T. J. [2 ]
Redmond, S. J. [2 ]
Zimmerman, P. V. [1 ]
Fong, K. M. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Prince Charles Hosp, Dept Thorac Med, Brisbane, Qld 4032, Australia
[2] Prince Charles Hosp, Dept Med Imaging, Brisbane, Qld 4032, Australia
[3] Prince Charles Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, Brisbane, Qld 4032, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] St Andrews War Mem Hosp, St Andrews Med Inst, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[6] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Biomed Technol Serv, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
lung neoplasms; radiography; thoracic; tomography; X-ray computed*; adverse effect; method; mass screening; LOW-DOSE CT; SPIRAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; PULMONARY NODULES; BREAST; TRIAL; CHEST; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; MORTALITY; STATEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02789.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in Australia. Screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) can reduce lung cancer mortality. The feasibility of screening in Australia is unknown. This paper describes the rationale, design and methods of the Queensland Lung Cancer Screening Study. Aims The aim of the study is to describe the methodology for a feasibility study of lung cancer screening by LDCT in Australia. Methods The Queensland Lung Cancer Screening Study is an ongoing, prospective observational study of screening by LDCT at a single tertiary institution. Healthy volunteers at high risk of lung cancer (age 6074 years; smoking history 30 pack years, current or quit within 15 years; forced expiratory volume in 1s 50% predicted) are recruited from the general public through newspaper advertisement and press release. Participants receive a LDCT scan of the chest at baseline, year 1 and year 2 using a multidetector helical computed tomography scanner and are followed up for a total of 5 years. Feasibility of screening will be assessed by cancer detection rates, lung nodule prevalence, optimal management strategies for lung nodules, economic costs, healthcare utilisation and participant quality of life. Conclusions Studying LDCT screening in the Australian setting will help us understand how differences in populations, background diseases and healthcare structures modulate screening effectiveness. This information, together with results from overseas randomised studies, will inform and facilitate local policymaking.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 182
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The rationale for, and design of, a lung cancer screening program
    Mazzone, Peter
    [J]. CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 79 (05) : 337 - 345
  • [2] QUEENSLAND LUNG CANCER SCREENING STUDY: INTERIUM RESULTS
    Marshall, H.
    Bowman, Rv.
    Crossin, J.
    Fuentes, M.
    Slaughter, R.
    Passmore, L.
    McCaul, L.
    Courtenay, D.
    Webb, M.
    Windsor, M.
    Yang, Ia.
    Zimmerman, P. V.
    Hayes, T.
    Redmond, S.
    Fong, K. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 6 (03) : S6 - S6
  • [3] Demonstration program of population-based lung cancer screening in China: Rationale and study design
    Zhou, Qinghua
    Fan, Yaguang
    Wu, Ning
    Huang, Yunchao
    Wang, Ying
    Li, Lu
    Liu, Jiewei
    Wang, Xinyun
    Li, Weimin
    Qiao, Youlin
    [J]. THORACIC CANCER, 2014, 5 (03) : 197 - 203
  • [4] Rationale and Design of the Lung Cancer Screening Implementation Evaluation of Patient-Centered Care Study
    Miranda, Leah S.
    Datta, Santanu
    Melzer, Anne C.
    Wiener, Renda Soylemez
    Davis, James M.
    Tong, Betty C.
    Golden, Sara E.
    Slatore, Christopher G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2017, 14 (10) : 1581 - 1590
  • [5] The PRImary care Screening Methods (PRISM) study: Rationale and design considerations
    Bryan, Craig J.
    Allen, Michael H.
    Thomsen, Cynthia J.
    May, Alexis M.
    Baker, Justin C.
    Harris, Julia A.
    Bryan, AnnaBelle O.
    Russell, William A.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2019, 84
  • [6] The 10 Pillars of Lung Cancer Screening: Rationale and Logistics of a Lung Cancer Screening Program
    Fintelmann, Florian J.
    Bernheim, Adam
    Digumarthy, Subba R.
    Lennes, Inga T.
    Kalra, Mannudeep K.
    Gilman, Matthew D.
    Sharma, Amita
    Flores, Efren J.
    Muse, Victorine V.
    Shepard, Jo-Anne O.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2015, 35 (07) : 1894 - 1909
  • [7] INTERSTITIAL LUNG ABNORMALITIES IN THE QUEENSLAND LUNG CANCER SCREENING COHORT
    Mackintosh, J.
    Slaughter, R.
    Marshall, H.
    Bowman, R.
    Yang, I
    Fong, K.
    [J]. RESPIROLOGY, 2018, 23 : 201 - 201
  • [8] Rationale and Design of the Japan Molecular Epidemiology for Lung Cancer Study
    Kawaguchi, Tomoya
    Ando, Masahiko
    Ito, Norimasa
    Isa, Shun-Ichi
    Tamiya, Akihiro
    Shimizu, Shigeki
    Saka, Hideo
    Kubo, Akihito
    Koh, Yasuhiro
    Matsumura, Akihide
    [J]. CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2013, 14 (05) : 596 - 600
  • [9] Lung cancer screening in the gulf: Rationale and recommendations
    Bennji, Sami M.
    Jayakrishnan, B.
    Al-Kindi, Adil H.
    Al-Jahdhami, Issa
    Al-Hashami, Zamzam
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC MEDICINE, 2022, 17 (04) : 189 - 192
  • [10] HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE - QUEENSLAND LUNG CANCER SCREENING STUDY
    Marshall, H.
    Passmore, L.
    Elizabeth, M.
    Yang, I
    Bowman, R.
    Fong, K.
    [J]. RESPIROLOGY, 2018, 23 : 96 - 96