Does intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection improve embryo development? A randomized sibling-oocyte study

被引:43
|
作者
De Vos, A. [1 ]
Van de Velde, H. [1 ]
Bocken, G. [1 ]
Eylenbosch, G. [1 ]
Franceus, N. [1 ]
Meersdom, G. [1 ]
Tistaert, S. [1 ]
Vankelecom, A. [1 ]
Tournaye, H. [1 ]
Verheyen, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ziekenhuis Brussel, Ctr Reprod Med, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
IMSI; ICSI; sibling-oocyte study; embryo development; HIGH-MAGNIFICATION; NUCLEAR VACUOLES; PREGNANCY RATE; ICSI; FERTILIZATION; IVF; SPERMATOZOA; QUALITY; CYCLES;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/des435
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Does high-magnification sperm selection influence oocyte fertilization and further embryo development? The present study did not show a difference in oocyte fertilization rate, nor in embryo development between high-magnification intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) and conventional ICSI. The presence of nuclear vacuoles in sperm seems to influence embryo development and more specifically blastocyst formation. The use of high magnification for morphological sperm selection prior to ICSI has been associated with higher pregnancy rates and lower miscarriage rates. A prospective sibling-oocyte study was conducted, including 350 ICSI cycles to alleviate male infertility. Cycles were included from March 2010 to November 2011. On the day of treatment, a high-magnification sperm morphology was assessed on at least 200 spermatozoa. Primary endpoints were oocyte fertilization rate and embryo development. Because embryo transfers were not randomized, the clinical outcome (clinical pregnancy rate per transfer cycle) was descriptive. However, the embryologist selecting the embryos for transfer was blinded for the sperm selection procedure. IMSI morphology was assessed in 330 semen samples, resulting in the following distribution: 18.1 14.8 Grade I, 15.2 10.3 Grade II, 12.3 9.1 Grade III and 54.4 23.2 Grade IV. Oocyte fertilization rate was 79.1 and 77.3 after IMSI and ICSI, respectively (NS, paired t-test). Embryo development was similar in both treatment groups up to Day 5 of preimplantation development. Comparable numbers of IMSI-only (n 125) and ICSI-only (n 139) embryo transfers were performed. Clinical pregnancies with fetal heart beat were equally distributed over transfers with embryos from IMSI-only (34.4) or ICSI-only treatment (36.7). The clinical outcome remains descriptive. No firm conclusions could be drawn on cycle rank as a possible indication for IMSI. The prevalence of vacuoles in normal-shaped spermatozoa is as low as 27.5. A routine application of IMSI in unselected artificial reproductive technology patients cannot be advocated. None.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 626
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Artificial oocyte activation after intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection: A prospective randomized sibling oocyte study
    Aydinuraz, Batu
    Dirican, Enver Kerem
    Olgan, Safak
    Aksunger, Ozlem
    Erturk, Onur Kadir
    [J]. HUMAN FERTILITY, 2016, 19 (04) : 282 - 288
  • [2] Impact of intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) on blastocyst quality: a prospective blinded randomized sibling oocyte study of IMSI vs. intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)
    Westlander, G.
    Borg, K.
    Persson, C.
    Rogberg, L.
    Saldeen, P.
    Wennerstrom, S.
    Hardarson, T.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 : 138 - 139
  • [3] Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection: a prospective randomized trial
    Antinori, Monica
    Licata, Emanuele
    Dani, Gianluca
    Cerusico, Fabrizio
    Versaci, Caterina
    d'Angelo, Daniela
    Antinori, Severino
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2008, 16 (06) : 835 - 841
  • [4] Oocyte activation before intracytoplasmic sperm injection does not improve the fertilization and embryo quality
    Kahraman, S
    Polat, G
    Sözen, E
    Akarsu, C
    Özbiçer, T
    Dirican, K
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 : 79 - 79
  • [5] INTRACYTOPLASMIC MORPHOLOGICALLY SELECTED SPERM INJECTION (IMSI) DOES NOT IMPROVE CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND EMBRYO PLOIDY IN ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE CYCLES.
    Keskintepe, L.
    Beyhan, Z.
    Dayal, M.
    Hart, J.
    Keskintepe, M.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (03) : E163 - E163
  • [6] Gender incidence on intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection approach: a prospective randomized study
    Iaconelli, A., Jr.
    Figueira, R. C. S.
    Setti, A. S.
    Braga, D. P. A. F.
    Pasqualotto, F. F.
    Borges, E., Jr.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 : I71 - I71
  • [7] Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection, but for whom?
    Karabulut, Seda
    Aksunger, Ozlem
    Korkmaz, Oya
    Gozel, Hilal Eren
    Keskin, Ilknur
    [J]. ZYGOTE, 2019, 27 (05) : 299 - 304
  • [8] RETRACTED ARTICLE: Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection versus conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a randomized controlled trial
    Giovanni Battista La Sala
    Alessia Nicoli
    Eleonora Fornaciari
    Angela Falbo
    Ilaria Rondini
    Daria Morini
    Barbara Valli
    Maria Teresa Villani
    Stefano Palomba
    [J]. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 13
  • [9] Retraction Note: Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection versus conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a randomized controlled trial
    Giovanni Battista La Sala
    Alessia Nicoli
    Eleonora Fornaciari
    Angela Falbo
    Ilaria Rondini
    Daria Morini
    Barbara Valli
    Maria Teresa Villani
    Stefano Palomba
    [J]. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 15
  • [10] Single or group embryo culture in an oocyte donation programme: a prospective, randomized sibling-oocyte study
    Pavlidou, T.
    Panagiotidis, Y.
    Papatheodorou, A.
    Petousis, S.
    Goudakou, M.
    Gkountis, A.
    Vanderzwalmen, P.
    Ravanos, K.
    Prapas, N.
    Prapas, Y.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 : 247 - 247