Effects of loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold knife conization on pregnancy outcomes

被引:4
|
作者
Guo, H. J. [1 ]
Guo, R. X. [1 ]
Liu, Y. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Conization of cervix; Cervical loop electrosurgical excision procedure; Cervical cold knife conization; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Pregnancy outcomes; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; PRETERM DELIVERY; SUBSEQUENT RISK; METAANALYSIS; LASER;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To explore the effects of cervical loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) or cold knife conization (CKC) on pregnancy outcomes. Materials and Methods: Patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) who wanted to become pregnant and received LEEP or CKC were considered as the treatment groups. Women who wanted to become pregnant and only underwent colposcopic biopsy without any treatments were considered as the control group. The pregnancy outcomes were observed and compared in the three groups. Results: Premature delivery rate was higher (p = 0.048) in the CKC group (14 / 36, 38.88%) than in control group (14 / 68, 20.5%) with a odds ratio (OR) of 2.455 (1.007 - 5.985); and premature delivery was related to cone depth, OR was significantly increased when the cone depth was more than 15 mm There was no significant difference in premature delivery between LEEP (10 / 48, 20.83%) and the control groups. The average gestational weeks were shorter (p = 0.049) in the CKC group (36.9 +/- 2.4) than in the control group (37.8 +/- 2.6), but similar in LEEP (38.1 +/- 2.4) and control groups. There were no significant differences in cesarean sections between the three groups. The ratio of neonatal birth weight less than 2,500 g was significantly higher (p = 0.005) in the CKC group (15/36) than in the control group (10/68), but similar in the LEEP and control groups. Conclusion: Compared with CKC, LEEP is relatively safe. LEEP should be a priority in the treatment of patients with CIN who want to become pregnant.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 82
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cold-knife conization versus conization by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: A randomized, prospective study
    Duggan, BD
    Felix, JC
    Muderspach, LI
    Gebhardt, JA
    Groshen, S
    Morrow, P
    Roman, LD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 180 (02) : 276 - 282
  • [2] Pregnancy outcome after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization
    Michelin, M. A.
    Merino, L. M.
    Franco, C. A.
    Murta, E. F. C.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 36 (01): : 17 - 19
  • [3] Cold-knife conization versus the loop electrosurgical excision procedure for treatment of cervical dysplasia
    Bozanovic, T.
    Ljubic, A.
    Momcilov, P.
    Milicevic, S.
    Mostic, T.
    Atanackovic, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 29 (01) : 83 - 85
  • [4] Pregnancy Outcome after the Treatment of Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure or Cold-Knife Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
    Liu, Yi
    Qiu, Hai Fan
    Tang, Yunbing
    Chen, Jie
    Lv, Jieqiang
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2014, 77 (04) : 240 - 244
  • [5] Management of Adenocarcinoma In Situ of the Uterine Cervix: A Comparison of Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure and Cold Knife Conization
    Latif, Nawar A.
    Neubauer, Nikki L.
    Helenowski, Irene B.
    Lurain, John R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2015, 19 (02) : 97 - 102
  • [6] Outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia - Can it replace cold knife conization?
    Eduardo, AM
    VanDinh, T
    Hannigan, EV
    Yandell, RB
    Schnadig, VJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 1996, 41 (10) : 729 - 732
  • [7] COMPARISON OF OFFICE LOOP ELECTROSURGICAL CONIZATION AND COLD KNIFE CONIZATION
    SAIDI, MH
    SETZLER, FD
    SADLER, RK
    FARHART, SA
    AKRIGHT, BD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 1994, 1 (02): : 135 - 139
  • [8] Specimen Fragmentation and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure and Cold Knife Cone Biopsy Outcomes
    Grubman, Jessica
    Meinhardt, Summer S.
    Nambiar, Anjali
    Lea, Jayanthi S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2020, 24 (01) : 27 - 33
  • [9] Pregnancy Outcomes Following Cervical Conization or Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedures
    Gatta, Luke A.
    Kuller, Jeffrey A.
    Rhee, Eleanor H. J.
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2017, 72 (08) : 494 - 499
  • [10] Pregnancy outcomes after loop electrosurgical excision procedure
    Dunn, Terry S.
    Nelson, Michael
    Hessler, B. J.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 107 (04): : 28S - 29S