Least Quartic Regression Criterion to Evaluate Systematic Risk in the Presence of Co-Skewness and Co-Kurtosis

被引:4
|
作者
Arbia, Giuseppe [1 ]
Bramante, Riccardo [1 ]
Facchinetti, Silvia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Stat Sci, Largo Gemelli 1, I-20123 Milan, Italy
关键词
co-skewness; co-kurtosis; least quartic criterion; systematic risk evaluation; portfolio optimization; CROSS-SECTION; ASSET PRICES; PREFERENCE; EQUILIBRIUM; PERFORMANCE; LOTTERIES; MODELS; STOCKS;
D O I
10.3390/risks8030095
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This article proposes a new method for the estimation of the parameters of a simple linear regression model which is based on the minimization of a quartic loss function. The aim is to extend the traditional methodology, based on the normality assumption, to also take into account higher moments and to provide a measure for situations where the phenomenon is characterized by strong non-Gaussian distribution like outliers, multimodality, skewness and kurtosis. Although the proposed method is very general, along with the description of the methodology, we examine its application to finance. In fact, in this field, the contribution of the co-moments in explaining the return-generating process is of paramount importance when evaluating the systematic risk of an asset within the framework of the Capital Asset Pricing Model. We also illustrate a Monte Carlo test of significance on the estimated slope parameter and an application of the method based on the top 300 market capitalization components of the STOXX(R)Europe 600. A comparison between the slope coefficients evaluated using the ordinary Least Squares (LS) approach and the new Least Quartic (LQ) technique shows that the perception of market risk exposure is best captured by the proposed estimator during market turmoil, and it seems to anticipate the market risk increase typical of these periods. Moreover, by analyzing the out-of-sample risk-adjusted returns we show that the proposed method outperforms the ordinary LS estimator in terms of the most common performance indices. Finally, a bootstrap analysis suggests that significantly different Sharpe ratios between LS and LQ yields and Value at Risk estimates can be considered more accurate in the LQ framework. This study adds insights into market analysis and helps in identifying more precisely potentially risky assets whose extreme behavior is strongly dependent on market behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Co-skewness and Co-kurtosis in Global Real Estate Securities
    Liow, Kim Hiang
    Chan, Lanz C. W. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROPERTY RESEARCH, 2005, 22 (2-3) : 163 - 203
  • [2] China vs. US: is co-skewness risk priced differently?
    Dong, Liang
    Kot, Hung Wan
    Lam, Keith S. K.
    Yu, Bo
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2022, 29 (05) : 1333 - 1353
  • [3] Haplotype architecture of the Alzheimer's risk in the APOE region via co-skewness
    Kulminski, Alexander M.
    Philipp, Ian
    Loika, Yury
    He, Liang
    Culminskaya, Irina
    [J]. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA: DIAGNOSIS, ASSESSMENT & DISEASE MONITORING, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [4] Is co-skewness a better measure of risk in the downside than downside beta? Evidence in emerging market data
    Galagedera, Don U. A.
    Brooks, Robert D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MULTINATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 17 (03) : 214 - 230