A framework for social life cycle impact assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Dreyer, LC
Hauschild, MZ
Schierbeck, J
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Mfg Engn & Management, Sect Innovat & Sustainabil, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Brodrene Hartmann AS, Corp Sustainable Dev, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[3] JPS Management, DK-2840 Holte, Denmark
来源
关键词
framework; social LCIA; human rights; international labour organisation (ILO); social LCA; social responsibility;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Goal, Scope and Background. To enhance the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) as a tool in business decision-making, a methodology for Social life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) is being developed. Social LCA aims at facilitating companies to conduct business in a socially responsible manner by providing information about the potential social impacts on people caused by the activities in the life cycle of their product. The development of the methodology has been guided by a business perspective accepting that companies, on the one hand, have responsibility for the people affected by their business activities, but, on the other hand, must also be able to compete and make profit in order to survive in the marketplace. Methods. A combined, bottom-up and top-down approach has been taken in the development of the Social LCIA. Universal consensus documents regarding social issues as well as consideration for the specific business context of companies has guided the determination of damage categories, impact categories and category indicators. Results, Discussion, and Conclusion. The main results are the following: (1) Impacts on people are naturally related to the conduct of the companies engaged in the life cycle rather than to the individual industrial processes, as is the case in Environmental LCA. Inventory analysis is therefore focused on the conduct of the companies engaged in the life cycle. A consequence of this view is that a key must be determined for relating the social profiles of the companies along the life cycle to the product. This need is not present in Environmental LCA, where we base the connection on the physical link which exists between process and product. (2) Boundaries of the product system are determined with respect to the influence that the product manufacturer exerts over the activities in the product chain. (3) A two-layer Social LCA method with an optional and an obligatory set of impact categories is suggested to ensure both societal and company relevance of the method. The obligatory set of impact categories encompasses the minimum expectations to a company conducting responsible business. (4) A new area of protection, Human dignity and Well-being, is defined and used to guide the modelling of impact chains. (5) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights serves as normative basis for Social LCA, together with local or Country norms based on socio-economic development goals of individual countries. The International Labour Organisation's Conventions and Recommendations, and the Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy, support development of the impact pathway top-down, starting from & normative basis. (6) The obligatory part of Social LCA addresses the main stakeholder groups, employees, local community and society. Recommendations and Outlook. Social LCA is still in its infancy and a number of further research tasks within this new area are identified.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 97
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A framework for Social life cycle impact assessment
    Dreyer, LC
    Hauschild, MZ
    Schierbeck, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2005, 10 (05): : 308 - 308
  • [2] A Framework for Social Life Cycle Impact Assessment (10 pp)
    Louise Dreyer
    Michael Hauschild
    Jens Schierbeck
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2006, 11 (2) : 88 - 97
  • [3] An analytic framework for social life cycle impact assessment—part 1: methodology
    Sheng-Wen Wang
    Chia-Wei Hsu
    Allen H. Hu
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016, 21 : 1514 - 1528
  • [4] Pollinators in life cycle assessment: towards a framework for impact assessment
    Crenna, Eleonora
    Sala, Serenella
    Polce, Chiara
    Collina, Elena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 140 : 525 - 536
  • [5] An analytic framework for social life cycle impact assessment-part 1: methodology
    Wang, Sheng-Wen
    Hsu, Chia-Wei
    Hu, Allen H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2016, 21 (10): : 1514 - 1528
  • [6] A framework for the assessment of marine litter impacts in life cycle impact assessment
    Woods, John S.
    Verones, Francesca
    Jolliet, Olivier
    Vazquez-Rowe, Ian
    Boulay, Anne-Marie
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 129
  • [7] Towards social life cycle assessment: a quantitative product social impact assessment
    Traverso, Marzia
    Bell, Lynn
    Saling, Peter
    Fontes, Joao
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (03): : 597 - 606
  • [8] Towards social life cycle assessment: a quantitative product social impact assessment
    Marzia Traverso
    Lynn Bell
    Peter Saling
    João Fontes
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 597 - 606
  • [9] Evaluation of social life-cycle performance of buildings: Theoretical framework and impact assessment approach
    Liu, Siyu
    Qian, Shunzhi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 213 : 792 - 807
  • [10] Causality in social life cycle impact assessment (SLCIA)
    Wu, Susie R.
    Chen, Jiquan
    Apul, Defne
    Fan, Peilei
    Yan, Yanfa
    Fan, Yi
    Zhou, Peiling
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (09): : 1312 - 1323