Differentiation criteria for strategic and non-strategic project and programmes

被引:0
|
作者
Nikolaevna, Apenko Svetlana [1 ,2 ]
Alekseevna, Klimenko Oxana [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] OMSU, Chair Innovat & Project Management, Omsk, Russia
[2] OMSU, Omsk, Russia
[3] MSUM, RANEP, Project Management IPMA C IPMA PPMC, GPM B, Moscow, Russia
[4] MSUM, RANEP, NRU HSE, Moscow, Russia
关键词
strategic projects; strategic programmes; strategic portfolios; criteria for strategic and non-strategic projects; programmes and portfolios;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
While managing the project it is important to realize the type and scale of it as well as the influence on the company's strategic goals. It could be useful to know what projects, por-grammes or portfolios are strategic and what of them are not. It is helpful for project managers to know the certain criteria for distinguishing the project, porgrammes and portfolios regarding their strategic (or non-strategic) nature. In this paper the authors try to develop the common basis view on the strategic and non-strategic project and suggest a number of criteria that could be used by the project managers, porgrammes managers and portfolio directors as well as other stakeholders. Research and justification methods of main conclusions were chosen: qualitative analysis of professional standards in project management on subject to references and disclosure of the question of strategy and strategic projects; a case study of strategic and non-strategic projects; expert survey on the criteria of differences in strategic and non-strategic projects. The authors identified criteria for the differences in strategic and non-strategic projects, prove conclusively that these fundamentally different types of projects require different methods, techniques and tools of management. The first step should be to identify the type of project in terms of its strategic vision.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 57
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] STRATEGIC AND NON-STRATEGIC DIFFERENTIATION
    GALOR, E
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 1987, 20 (02): : 340 - 356
  • [2] Revisiting strategic versus non-strategic cooperation
    Ernesto Reuben
    Sigrid Suetens
    [J]. Experimental Economics, 2012, 15 : 24 - 43
  • [3] Cognitive Characteristics of Strategic and Non-strategic Gamblers
    Aurélie Mouneyrac
    Céline Lemercier
    Valérie Le Floch
    Gaëlle Challet-Bouju
    Axelle Moreau
    Christian Jacques
    Isabelle Giroux
    [J]. Journal of Gambling Studies, 2018, 34 : 199 - 208
  • [4] Revisiting strategic versus non-strategic cooperation
    Reuben, Ernesto
    Suetens, Sigrid
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 15 (01) : 24 - 43
  • [5] Cognitive Characteristics of Strategic and Non-strategic Gamblers
    Mouneyrac, Aurelie
    Lemercier, Celine
    Le Floch, Valerie
    Challet-Bouju, Gaelle
    Moreau, Axelle
    Jacques, Christian
    Giroux, Isabelle
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GAMBLING STUDIES, 2018, 34 (01) : 199 - 208
  • [6] Neurocognitive dysfunction in strategic and non-strategic gamblers
    Grant, Jon E.
    Odlaug, Brian L.
    Chamberlain, Samuel R.
    Schreiber, Liana R. N.
    [J]. PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 38 (02): : 336 - 340
  • [7] Reconfiguring the strategic/non-strategic binary in im/politeness research
    Terkourafi, Marina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITENESS RESEARCH-LANGUAGE BEHAVIOUR CULTURE, 2024, 20 (01): : 111 - 134
  • [8] ... or not to be. The Strategic and Non-Strategic Use of Negative Identifiers in Online Forums
    Triebl, Eva
    [J]. AAA-ARBEITEN AUS ANGLISTIK UND AMERIKANISTIK, 2015, 40 (1-2) : 247 - 270
  • [9] Strategic and Non-Strategic Semantic Expectations Hierarchically Modulate Neural Processing
    Vidal-Gran, Consuelo
    Sokoliuk, Rodika
    Bowman, Howard
    Cruse, Damian
    [J]. ENEURO, 2020, 7 (05) : 1 - 15
  • [10] Comparison of gambling profiles based on strategic versus non-strategic preferences
    Jimenez-Murcia, Susana
    Granero, Roser
    Fernandez-Aranda, Fernando
    Menchon, Jose M.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2020, 31 : 13 - 20