LEARNING OBJECT REPOSITORIES CHALLENGING GOOGLE - THE USERS' POINT OF VIEW

被引:0
|
作者
Clements, K. [1 ]
Gras-Velazquez, A.
Pawlowski, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jyvaskyla, SF-40351 Jyvaskyla, Finland
关键词
Open educational resources; Learning Object Repositories; Learning Resource Exchange; Search engines; Google; Teachers;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Open Educational Resources (OER) are most commonly accessible through Learning Object Repositories (LORs) or databases allowing users to search by the metadata records (e. g., information on contents, target group, legal aspects) attached to the resources. Many LORs are currently not being used for their full potential. This paper examines how repositories can be used beneficially for teachers to find resources for their lessons in comparison to efficient search engines like Google. In our study, we analyze how teachers-the key target group of users-search for OER by using the search engine Google as well as using Learning Resource Exchange (LRE), an LOR with a considerable collection of OER. Based on a experiments along with a quantitative empirical study, we survey which searching features seem to help teachers in locating relevant resources for their lessons. Based on our findings, we derive recommendations for searching OER as well as setting up Learning Object Repositories which would serve the users and therefore generate more re-use of the existing OER.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 635
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Relationships between Users, Resources and Services in Learning Object Repositories
    Conesa, Jordi
    Minguillon, Julia
    Elena Rodriguez, M.
    [J]. METADATA AND SEMANTICS RESEARCH, 2012, 343 : 127 - 132
  • [2] Linking learning object repositories
    Richards, Griff
    Hatala, Marek
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEARNING TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 1 (04) : 399 - 410
  • [3] Semantic learning object repositories
    Soto Carrion, Jesus
    Garcia Gordo, Elisa
    Sanchez-Alonso, Salvador
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTINUING ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND LIFE-LONG LEARNING, 2007, 17 (06) : 432 - 446
  • [4] Learning Object Annotation for Agricultural Learning Repositories
    Ebner, Hannes
    Manouselis, Nikos
    Palmer, Matthias
    Enoksson, Fredrik
    Palavitsinis, Nikos
    Kastrantas, Kostas
    Naeve, Ambjorn
    [J]. ICALT: 2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2009, : 438 - 442
  • [5] Semantic Enhancement of Learning Object Repositories
    Fernandez-Pena, Felix
    Ramos-Moreno, Yariel
    Ponce-Toste, Yudit
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND DECISION SUPPORT (EUREKA-2013), 2013, 51 : 310 - 314
  • [6] Accessibility Evaluation of Learning Object Repositories
    Londono-Rojas, Luis
    Vicari, Rosa Maria
    Duque-Mendez, Nestor
    [J]. 2022 XVII LATIN AMERICAN CONFERENCE ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES (LACLO 2022), 2022, : 35 - 41
  • [7] Quantitative Analysis of Learning Object Repositories
    Ochoa, Xavier
    Duval, Erik
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2009, 2 (03): : 226 - 238
  • [8] The Integration of Learning Object Repositories and Learning Management Systems
    Fertalj, Kresimir
    Hoic-Bozic, Natasa
    Jerkovic, Hrvoje
    [J]. COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2010, 7 (03) : 387 - 407
  • [9] SPEX - USERS POINT OF VIEW
    BARTON, HR
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 1975, 20 (04): : 593 - 593
  • [10] A Hybrid Recommendation Model for Learning Object Repositories
    Gordillo, A.
    Barra, E.
    Quemada, J.
    [J]. IEEE LATIN AMERICA TRANSACTIONS, 2017, 15 (03) : 462 - 473