Start of a CO2 hub in Rotterdam: connecting CCS and CCU

被引:13
|
作者
Ros, Menno [1 ]
Read, Andy [1 ]
Uilenreef, Jan [1 ]
Limbeek, Jacob [2 ]
机构
[1] Maasvlakte CCS Project, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] OCAP CO2 BV, Schiedam, Netherlands
关键词
CCUS; EEPR; EU flagship CCS project; ROAD project;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.291
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Rotterdam is an industry intensive region with the ambition of combining economic growth with sustainable development. It set itself the target to reduce annual CO2 emissions with 50% by 2025 compared to 1990 levels (a 27 Mt reduction compared to business as usual). CCS is projected to play a big role in reaching this target, providing 60-70% of the reduction. The ROAD project aims to capture 1.1 Mt/yr on average at a new build coal fired power plant (Maasvlakte Power Plant 3, MPP3) on the Maasvlakte/Rotterdam. There is also a possibility to re-use (CCU) part of this captured CO2 in greenhouses north of Rotterdam. OCAP currently delivers CO2 from a refinery and bioethanol plant to greenhouses to enhance crop growth. This is seasonal demand, so the CO2 sources emit the CO2 in the winter. ROAD and OCAP have investigated the possibility to connect the two infrastructures and thereby creating a CO2 hub in Rotterdam, giving additional CO2 delivery to greenhouses in summer and additional CO2 storage in winter. The main challenge is the sizing, design and operation of the infrastructure, an 18 km pipeline. A 20 '' or 24 '' pipeline operated at 21 bar seems to be the best option. Between these two pipelines the only distinction is the throughput (and therefore fit with ambitions of CCS and CCU). With a marginal additional investment the throughput increases by 50-60% between a 20 '' and 24 '' pipeline. Another advantage of using a 21 bar pipeline to connect the system is the possibility to control the temperature in the ROAD pipeline to the storage site. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2691 / 2701
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of a CO2 specification for a CCS hub network
    Harkin, Trent
    Filby, Ian
    Sick, Heidi
    Manderson, Dan
    Ashton, Rebecca
    [J]. 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13, 2017, 114 : 6708 - 6720
  • [2] CCU: A more feasible and economic strategy than CCS for reducing CO2 emissions
    [J]. Xie, H.-P. (xiehep@scu.edu.cn), 1600, Editorial Department of Journal of Sichuan University (44):
  • [3] CO2减排CCS与CCU路线的热力学认识
    朱家骅
    郭鑫楠
    谢和平
    夏素兰
    梁斌
    谢凌志
    王子宁
    [J]. 工程科学与技术, 2013, 5 (05) : 1 - 7
  • [4] Start with CO2
    Bentley, P. H.
    [J]. CHEMISTRY WORLD, 2010, 7 (02): : 43 - 43
  • [5] Flow modelling to quantify structural control on CO2 migration and containment, CCS South West Hub, Australia
    Langhi, Laurent
    Strand, Julian
    Ricard, Ludovic
    [J]. PETROLEUM GEOSCIENCE, 2021, 27 (02)
  • [6] Development of CO2 terminal and CO2 carrier for future commercialized CCS market
    Yoo, Byeong-Yong
    Choi, Dong-Kyu
    Kim, Hyun-Jin
    Moon, Young-Sik
    Na, Hee-Seung
    Lee, Sung-Geun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2013, 12 : 323 - 332
  • [7] CCU - Carbon capture and use The use of CO2 as a feedstock
    Morosini, Pierfrancesco
    [J]. CHIMICA OGGI-CHEMISTRY TODAY, 2018, 36 (03) : 14 - 15
  • [8] Containment of CO2 in CCS: Role of Caprocks and Faultsn
    Kaldi, John
    Daniel, Ric
    Tenthorey, Eric
    Michael, Karsten
    Schacht, Ulrike
    Nicol, Andy
    Underschultz, Jim
    Backe, Guillaume
    [J]. GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 5403 - 5410
  • [9] CO2 Transport Strategy for the Offshore CCS in Korea
    Jung, Jung-Yeul
    Huh, Cheol
    Kang, Seong-Gil
    Seo, Youngkyun
    Chang, Daejun
    [J]. GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 3242 - 3249
  • [10] CCS Models set to improve CO2 storage
    Adriaanse, Chris
    [J]. CHEMISTRY & INDUSTRY, 2010, (21) : 7 - 7