Anchoring-and-Adjustment to Improve the Quality of Significant Features

被引:0
|
作者
Park, Eunkyung [1 ]
Wong, Raymond K. [1 ]
Kwon, Junbum [2 ]
Chu, Victor W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Comp Sci & Engn, Sydney, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Mkt, Sydney, Australia
[3] Nanyang Technol Univ, Comp Sci & Engn, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Explainable models; Content features; Anchoring-and-adjustment; Variance-inflation-factor; Significance test; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-90888-1_15
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
There is an enormous demand for Explainable Artificial Intelligence to obtain human-understandable models. For example, advertisers are keen to understand what makes video ads successful. In our investigation, we have analysed heterogeneous visual, auditory, and textual content features from YouTube video ads. This paper proposes a two-stage anchoring-and-adjustment approach. In the first stage, we search for the optimum penalized value in the regularization path of Lasso that maximizes the number of Significant Features (SFs). After that, we improve the quality of SFs by dropping features with high Variance-Inflation-Factor (VIF) because high VIF often makes a spurious set of SFs. Experiments show that, compared to the one-stage approach without the adjustment stage, our proposed two-stage approach results in a smaller number of SFs but a higher ability to identify true features that appeal to ad viewers from human evaluation. Furthermore, our approach can identify much more SFs while maintaining similar prediction accuracy as what Lasso and Elastic-net can obtain.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 197
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic
    Epley, N
    Gilovich, T
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (04) : 311 - 318
  • [2] Anchoring-and-Adjustment During Affect Inferences
    Yik, Michelle
    Wong, Kin Fai Ellick
    Zeng, Kevin J.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 9
  • [3] Neural correlates of anchoring-and-adjustment during mentalizing
    Tamir, Diana I.
    Mitchell, Jason P.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (24) : 10827 - 10832
  • [4] Anchoring-and-Adjustment Bias in Communication of Disease Risk
    Senay, Ibrahim
    Kaphingst, Kimberly A.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2009, 29 (02) : 193 - 201
  • [5] OVERCONFIDENCE IN ESTIMATION - TESTING THE ANCHORING-AND-ADJUSTMENT HYPOTHESIS
    BLOCK, RA
    HARPER, DR
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 49 (02) : 188 - 207
  • [6] Bounded rationality, anchoring-and-adjustment sentiment, and asset pricing
    Liang, Hanchao
    Yang, Chunpeng
    Zhang, Rengui
    Cai, Chuangqun
    [J]. NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2017, 40 : 85 - 102
  • [7] EXPERTS, AMATEURS, AND REAL-ESTATE - AN ANCHORING-AND-ADJUSTMENT PERSPECTIVE ON PROPERTY PRICING DECISIONS
    NORTHCRAFT, GB
    NEALE, MA
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1987, 39 (01) : 84 - 97
  • [8] Egocentric Anchoring-and-Adjustment Underlies Social Inferences About Known Others Varying in Similarity and Familiarity
    Wang, Y. Andre
    Simpson, Austin J.
    Todd, Andrew R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2023, 152 (04) : 1011 - 1029
  • [9] Heuristic Vetoing: Top-Down Influences of the Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic Can Override the Bottom-Up Information in Visual Images
    Branch, Fallon
    Park, Erin
    Hegde, Jay
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16
  • [10] Perceptual anchoring and adjustment
    Jain, Gaurav
    Nayakankuppam, Dhananjay
    Gaeth, Gary J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 34 (04) : 581 - 592