Response-Stimulus Interval Duration Modulates Interference Effects in the Stroop Task

被引：3

作者：

Galer, S. ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

Schmitz, R. ^{[2
,3
]}

Leproult, R. ^{[2
,3
]}

De Tiege, X. ^{[1
,2
]}

Van Bogaert, P. ^{[1
,2
]}

Peigneux, P. ^{[2
,3
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, ULB Hop Erasme, LCFC Lab Cartog Fonct Cervcau, Brussels, Belgium

[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, UNI ULB Neurosci Inst, Brussels, Belgium

[3] Univ Libre Bruxelles, CRCN Ctr Res Cognit & Neurosci, Neuropsychol & Funct Neuroimaging Res Grp UR2NF, Brussels, Belgium

来源：

PSYCHOLOGICA BELGICA | 2014年 / 54卷 / 01期

关键词：

SELECTIVE ATTENTION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; CHILDREN; EPILEPSY; SUPPRESSION; POTENTIALS; MECHANISMS; GUIDELINES; CHILDHOOD; BURDEN;

D O I：

10.5334/pb.ad

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

In the Stroop task, incongruent stimuli (e.g. "red" printed in blue) induce a robust interference effect. The impact of both the changes in the duration of the interval between the subject's response and the next stimulus (RSI) and the development from childhood to adulthood on the size of the interference have not been systematically studied. We have therefore tested the modulation of within-task RSI (from 1000 to 5000 ms) on the interference effect in 8-10 years old children and young adults. Results disclose a stronger interference effect for the shortest RSI duration (1000 ms) in both adults and children, indicating more effective inhibitory processses for longer RSI durations. Moreover, similar interference effect were found between children and adults suggesting that both groups are similarly affected by interference. Taken together, these results suggest that inhibitory processes require a certain amount of time to develop.

引用

页码：97 / 110

页数：14

共 50 条

[1] Effects of response-stimulus interval manipulation and articulatory suppression on task switching
Saeki, Erina
Saito, Satoru
Kawaguchi, Jun
[J]. MEMORY, 2006, 14 (08) : 965 - 976
[2] Further investigation of distinct components of Stroop interference and of their reduction by short response-stimulus intervals
Augustinova, Maria
Silvert, Laetitia
Spatola, Nicolas
Ferrand, Ludovic
[J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2018, 189 : 54 - 62
[3] Response repetitions in auditory task switching: The influence of spatial response distance and of the response-stimulus interval
Seibold, Julia C.
Koch, Iring
Nolden, Sophie
Proctor, Robert W.
Vu, Kim-Phuong L.
Schuch, Stefanie
[J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2019, 199
[4] PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY DELAY AND RESPONSE-STIMULUS INTERVAL DURATION IN SERIAL, CHOICE-RESPONSE TASKS
RABBITT, P
[J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1969, 30 : 195 - +
[5] Dissociating stimulus-stimulus and response-response effects in the Stroop task
Schmidt, JR
Cheesman, J
[J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2005, 59 (02): : 132 - 138
[6] DISCUSSION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY DELAY AND RESPONSE-STIMULUS INTERVAL DURATION IN SERIAL, CHOICE-RESPONSE TASKS
FALMAGNE, JC
RABBITT, P
PEW, RW
DAVIS, R
[J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1969, 30 : 217 - &
[7] Influence of response-stimulus interval (RSI) on sequence learning
Chambaron, Stephanie
Destrobacqz, Arnaud
Ginhac, Dominique
Cleeremans, Axel
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 258 - 258
[8] STIMULUS-RESPONSE COMPATIBILITY AS A DETERMINANT OF INTERFERENCE IN A STROOP-LIKE TASK
FOX, E
[J]. BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1992, 30 (05) : 377 - 380
[9] The influence of the response-stimulus interval on implicit and explicit learning of stimulus sequence
Miyawaki, Kaori
[J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2006, 70 (04): : 262 - 272
[10] The Variable Response-Stimulus Interval Effect and Sleep Deprivation: An Unexplored Aspect of Psychomotor Vigilance Task Performance
Tucker, Adrienne M.
Basner, Robert C.
Stern, Yaakov
Rakitin, Brian C.
[J]. SLEEP, 2009, 32 (10) : 1393 - 1395

← 1 2 3 4 5 →