Professional development opportunities as retention incentives in child welfare

被引:31
|
作者
Clark, Sherrill J. [1 ]
Smith, Richard J. [2 ]
Uota, Kazumi [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Social Welf, Calif Social Work Educ Ctr, Berkeley, CA 94705 USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Sch Social Work, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
Child welfare; Social work; Retention; Survival analysis; PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT; SOCIAL-WORK; SUPERVISOR SUPPORT; JOB-SATISFACTION; TURNOVER; CLIMATE; OUTCOMES; CULTURE; STAFF; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.07.006
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
This study examined the career paths of 415 Title IV-E MSW graduates in one state retrospectively over 180 months post-graduation to discover factors that could be important in affecting retention in public child welfare agencies. The Title IV-E educational program is designed to be a retention strategy at the same time as it is a professionalization strategy. We surmised that perceived organizational support (POS) contributes to retention by acknowledging the workers' needs for career development support. The median survival time for these child welfare social workers was 43 months for the first job and 168 months for the entire child welfare career. The initial analysis showed steep drops in retention occurred at 24-36 months post-graduation, approximately at the end of the Title IV-E work obligation. Upon further examination, Kaplan-Meier tests showed organizational factors relevant to workers' professional career development predicted retention. Having access to continuing education and agency-supported case-focused supervision for licensure were correlated with retention at the 24-36 month post-graduation mark. At 72 months post-graduation, promotion to supervisor was a significant factor found to encourage retention. Being a field instructor for MSW students and being promoted to a managerial position were not significantly related to retention. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1687 / 1697
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical Supervision for MSWs in Child Welfare: A Professional Development Model
    Giddings, Martha M.
    Cleveland, Peggy
    Smith, Carol H.
    Collins-Camargo, Crystal
    Russell, Regina G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC CHILD WELFARE, 2008, 2 (03) : 339 - 365
  • [2] The retention of public child welfare workers: The roles of professional organizational culture and coping strategies
    Lee, Joohee
    Forster, Michael
    Rehner, Tim
    [J]. CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2011, 33 (01) : 102 - 109
  • [3] Supervisor as Informal Mentor: Promoting Professional Development in Public Child Welfare
    Collins-Camargo, Crystal
    Kelly, Michael J.
    [J]. CLINICAL SUPERVISOR, 2007, 25 (1-2): : 127 - 146
  • [4] The Climate of Child Welfare Employee Retention
    Cahalane, Helen
    Sites, Edward W.
    [J]. CHILD WELFARE, 2008, 87 (01) : 91 - 114
  • [5] Future challenges and opportunities in child welfare
    Maluccio, AN
    Anderson, GR
    [J]. CHILD WELFARE, 2000, 79 (01) : 3 - 9
  • [6] Professional development opportunities
    Bowling, Ann M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, 2022, 67 : 169 - 169
  • [7] Child welfare and the courts: A statewide study with implications for professional development, practice, and change
    Ellett, AJ
    Steib, SD
    [J]. RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2005, 15 (05) : 339 - 352
  • [8] Retention and job satisfaction of child welfare supervisors
    McCrae, Julie S.
    Scannapieco, Maria
    Obermann, Ann
    [J]. CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2015, 59 : 171 - 176
  • [9] Retention of Child Welfare Caseworkers: The Wisdom of Supervisors
    Griffiths, Austin
    Desrosiers, Patricia
    Gabbard, Jay
    Royse, David
    Piescher, Kristine
    [J]. CHILD WELFARE, 2019, 97 (03) : 61 - 83
  • [10] Secondary Traumatic Stress and the Child Welfare Professional
    Kenny, Maureen C.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA-THEORY RESEARCH PRACTICE AND POLICY, 2011, 3 (03) : 309 - 309