Hearing outcome measures for conductive and mixed hearing loss treatment in adults: a scoping review

被引:14
|
作者
Hill-Feltham, Penny R. [1 ]
Johansson, Martin L. [2 ,3 ]
Hodgetts, William E. [4 ]
Ostevik, Amberley, V [4 ]
McKinnon, Brian J. [5 ]
Monksfield, Peter [6 ]
Sockalingam, Ravi [7 ]
Wright, Tracy [6 ]
Tysome, James R. [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Univ NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Audiol Dept, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Biomat, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Oticon, Askim, Sweden
[4] Univ Alberta, Inst Reconstruct Sci Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Texas Med Branch, Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg Dept, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[6] Univ Hosp Birmingham, ENT Dept, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[7] Oticon Med Inc, Somerset, NJ USA
[8] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Hearing Grp, Cambridge, England
[9] Cambridge Univ Hosp, Otolaryngol Dept, Cambridge, England
关键词
Mixed hearing loss; conductive hearing loss; outcome measures; review; CORE SETS; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1080/14992027.2020.1820087
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective Rehabilitation options for conductive and mixed hearing loss are continually expanding, but without standard outcome measures comparison between different treatments is difficult. To meaningfully inform clinicians and patients core outcome sets (COS), determined via a recognised methodology, are needed. Following our previous work that identified hearing, physical, economic and psychosocial as core areas of a future COS, the AURONET group reviewed hearing outcome measures used in existing literature and assigned them into different domains within the hearing core area. Design Scoping review. Study Sample Literature including hearing outcome measurements for the treatment of conductive and/or mixed hearing loss. Results The literature search identified 1434 studies, with 278 subsequently selected for inclusion. A total of 837 hearing outcome measures were reported and grouped into nine domains. The largest domain constituted pure-tone threshold measurements accounting for 65% of the total outcome measures extracted, followed by the domains of speech testing (20%) and questionnaires (9%). Studies of hearing implants more commonly included speech tests or hearing questionnaires compared with studies of middle ear surgery. Conclusions A wide range of outcome measures are currently used, highlighting the importance of developing a COS to inform individual practice and reporting in trials/research.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 245
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Physical outcome measures for conductive and mixed hearing loss treatment: A systematic review
    Johansson, M. L.
    Tysome, J. R.
    Hill-Feltham, P.
    Hodgetts, W. E.
    Ostevik, A.
    McKinnon, B. J.
    Monksfield, P.
    Sockalingam, R.
    Wright, T.
    [J]. CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 43 (05) : 1226 - 1234
  • [2] Psychosocial outcome measures for conductive and mixed hearing loss treatment: An overview of the relevant literature
    Ostevik, Amberley, V
    Hill-Feltam, Penny
    Johansson, Martin L.
    McKinnon, Brian J.
    Monksfield, Peter
    Sockalingam, Ravi
    Tysome, James R.
    Wright, Tracy
    Hodgetts, William E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2021, 60 (09) : 641 - 649
  • [3] Hearing care services for adults with hearing loss in Malaysia: a scoping review
    Romli, Maziah
    Timmer, Barbra H. B.
    Dawes, Piers
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2024, 63 (10) : 753 - 760
  • [4] Clinical Trials and Outcome Measures in Adults With Hearing Loss
    Munro, Kevin J.
    Whitmer, William M.
    Heinrich, Antje
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [5] Vibroplasty for Mixed and Conductive Hearing Loss
    Luers, Jan Christoffer
    Huettenbrink, Karl-Bernd
    Zahnert, Thomas
    Bornitz, Matthias
    Beutner, Dirk
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2013, 34 (06) : 1005 - 1012
  • [6] The treatment of the conductive hearing loss
    Mielcarek-Kuchta, Daniela
    Wasniewska, Elzbieta
    Obrebowska-Karsznia, Zofia
    Lackowska-Przybylska, Joanna
    Szyfter, Witold
    [J]. POSTEPY W CHIRURGII GLOWY I SZYI-ADVANCES IN HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2006, 5 (01): : 36 - 45
  • [7] Listening-Based Communication Ability in Adults With Hearing Loss: A Scoping Review of Existing Measures
    Neal, Katie
    McMahon, Catherine M.
    Hughes, Sarah E.
    Boisvert, Isabelle
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [8] DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF HEARING LOSS, REVIEW OF CONDUCTIVE TYPE OF HEARING LOSS
    Alessa, Halimah Abdullah
    Basudan, Abdulhameed Ahmed Omar
    Alessa, Hatem Saeed
    Alnashri, Saud Ali
    Altalhi, Atheer Ali
    [J]. INDO AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 6 (03): : 6401 - 6409
  • [9] The Bonebridge in Adults with Mixed and Conductive Hearing Loss: Audiological and Quality of Life Outcomes
    Skarzynski, Piotr H.
    Ratuszniak, Anna
    Krol, Bartlomiej
    Koziel, Magdalena
    Osinska, Kamila
    Cywka, Katarzyna B.
    Sztabnicka, Anna
    Skarzynski, Henryk
    [J]. AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2019, 24 (02) : 90 - 99
  • [10] Hearing Outcomes with Percutaneous and Transcutaneous BAHA® Technology in Conductive and Mixed Hearing Loss
    Tobia, Amjad
    Yehudai, Noam
    Khnifes, Riad
    Shpak, Talma
    Roth, Osnat
    Khayr, Ranin
    Luntz, Michal
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2021, 42 (09) : 1382 - 1389