Treatment of Facet Cysts Associated With Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication With X-Stop

被引:3
|
作者
Abrams, Joshua [1 ]
Hsu, Ken [1 ]
Kondrashov, Dimitri [1 ]
McDermott, Tim [1 ]
Zucherman, James [1 ]
机构
[1] St Marys Hosp, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
来源
关键词
facet cyst; neurogenic intermittent claudication; interspinous process decompression; lumbar spinal stenosis; INTERSPINAL PROCESS DECOMPRESSION; LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS; IMPLANT; MULTICENTER; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e31823fadda
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Facet degeneration often leads to the formation of synovial facet cysts. As facet cysts invade the spinal canal, they become a contributing factor to spinal stenosis. Previous studies have demonstrated successful treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC), a major symptom of spinal stenosis, with an interspinous process device. Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes of patients with and without synovial facet cysts treated with an interspinous process device. Study Design: Retrospective review of prospective data of consecutive patients undergoing the X-Stop procedure at an institution. Outcome Measures: Visual Analog Scale; Oswestry Disability Index; sitting, standing, and walking tolerances; and satisfaction survey. Methods: Review of all patients from 2006 to 2010 undergoing X-Stop procedure at an institution. Imaging studies were used to identify the presence and measure the size of the facet cysts in 285 patients with a minimum of 6-month follow-up. Comparative clinical outcomes determined if X-Stop is a successful treatment option for patients with NIC in conjunction with synovial facet cysts (< 3 mm, >= 3 mm). Results: Fifty-eight of 285 patients (20.4%) were determined to have a synovial cyst as a contributing component of spinal stenosis. Twelve of 58 patients were noted to have a cyst >= 3mm. The mean follow-up time for patients with and without a facet cyst was 21 months (6-55 +/- 12 mo) and 22 months (6-61 +/- 12 mo), respectively. The age of the patient at the time of the operation with and without facet cysts was 73 (+/- 10 y). Patients without synovial cysts, with synovial cysts, and cysts >= 3mm had an average change in Oswestry Disability Index of 15.6, 15.8, and 16.2, respectively. Visual Analog Scale scores were 2.3, 1.8, and 2.3, respectively. In addition, on satisfaction surveys 72.4%, 82.0%, and 77.8% were either very or somewhat satisfied, respectively. Overall complications included 4 spinous process fracture, 4 hematomas, 1 wound infection, and 1 implant migration. Conclusions: No statistical difference was noted in any of the outcome measures among patients with small facet cysts, large facet cysts, or without facet cysts when treated with an interspinous process device. We can thus conclude that X-Stop is an appropriate treatment consideration for NIC with or without the presence of synovial facet cysts.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 221
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Treatment of Facet Cysts Associated With Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication With X-Stop (vol 26, pg 218, 2013)
    Kondrashov, Dimitriy
    [J]. CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2023, 36 (07): : 289 - 289
  • [2] X-STOP IMPLANTATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEUROGENIC INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION
    Heyrani, N.
    Huo, S. K.
    Shamie, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 59 (01) : 137 - 137
  • [3] Is the X STOP® interspinous implant a safe and effective treatment for neurogenic intermittent claudication?
    Eichholz, DM
    Fessler, RG
    [J]. NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE NEUROLOGY, 2006, 2 (01): : 22 - 23
  • [4] Is the X STOP® interspinous implant a safe and effective treatment for neurogenic intermittent claudication?
    Kurt M Eichholz
    Richard G Fessler
    [J]. Nature Clinical Practice Neurology, 2006, 2 : 22 - 23
  • [5] Self-rated evaluation of outcome of the implantation of interspinous process distraction (X-Stop) for neurogenic claudication
    Brussee, Paul
    Hauth, Jakob
    Donk, Roland D.
    Verbeek, Andre L. M.
    Bartels, Ronald H. M. A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 17 (02) : 200 - 203
  • [6] X-Stop Versus Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication Randomized Controlled Trial With 2-Year Follow-up
    Stromqvist, Bjorn H.
    Berg, Svante
    Gerdhem, Paul
    Johnsson, Ragnar
    Moller, Anders
    Sahlstrand, Tage
    Soliman, Ahmed
    Tullberg, Tycho
    [J]. SPINE, 2013, 38 (17) : 1436 - 1442
  • [7] Self-rated evaluation of outcome of the implantation of interspinous process distraction (X-Stop) for neurogenic claudication
    Paul Brussee
    Jakob Hauth
    Roland D. Donk
    André L. M. Verbeek
    Ronald H. M. A. Bartels
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2008, 17 : 200 - 203
  • [8] Two-Year Evaluation of the X-STOP Interspinous Spacer in Different Primary Patient Populations With Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication Because of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Hartjen, Charles A.
    Resnick, Daniel K.
    Hsu, Ken Y.
    Zucherman, James F.
    Hsu, Emily H.
    Skidmore, Grant A.
    [J]. CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 29 (07): : 305 - 311
  • [9] X-Stop Resulted in a Higher Reoperation Rate Than Minimally Invasive Decompression, But Both Decreased Symptoms of Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Huddleston, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 97A (22): : 1889 - 1889
  • [10] Insertion loads of the X STOP interspinous process distraction system designed to treat neurogenic intermittent claudication
    Vikram Talwar
    Derek P. Lindsey
    Amy Fredrick
    Ken Y. Hsu
    James F. Zucherman
    Scott A. Yerby
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2006, 15 : 908 - 912