Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: lessons learned and predictors for conversion

被引:26
|
作者
Hanna, Erin M. [1 ]
Rozario, Nigel [2 ]
Rupp, Christopher [3 ]
Sindram, David [1 ]
Iannitti, David A. [1 ]
Martinie, John B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dept Gen Surg, Div Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg, Charlotte, NC 28203 USA
[2] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dixon Inst, Charlotte, NC 28203 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Surg, Div Gastrointestinal Surg, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
robotics; hepatobiliary; pancreas; conversion; outcomes; LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY; ASSISTED PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; RESECTION; OUTCOMES; EXPERIENCE; TRANSPLANTATION; COMPLICATIONS; COHORT; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1002/rcs.1492
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The use of surgical robots has slowly gained an increasing presence in the realm of hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HPB) surgery. With additional experience, anecdotal evidence has been useful in guiding patient selection for complex robotic procedures. In the following analysis, we reviewed our case series and looked for predictors of conversion in robotic HPB surgery. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent robotic HPB procedures by a single surgeon at two institutions during March 2006-June 2012. Patient demographics, operative data, procedure type and conversion information were recorded. Trends were analysed for indications for conversion. A subset analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatomy was performed and compared with laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy during the same time period by the same surgeon. Results During this time period, 77 patients underwent robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic procedures. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon (J.M.) and included 38 males (49%) and 39 females (51%). Median age was 59 and the majority of patients were ASA class III. There were 24 conversions, which decreased in frequency from 2009 (7) to 2011 (3). Reasons for conversion included significant obesity and technical difficulty. Patients with conversions had more intraoperative blood loss (966 vs 176 ml), more frequently received transfusion (29% vs 2%) and were more likely to have postoperative intensive care. Overall length of stay was longer following conversion (8.3 vs 5.6 days). Conclusions Robotic-assisted hepatobiliary and pancreatic procedures are often extremely complex, with a significant learning curve. Recognizing factors that prohibit successful completion of a robotic-assisted surgical procedure is key for patient safety. Careful patient selection in the appropriate settings facilitates the maximal benefit of robotic-assisted complex HPB surgery. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 159
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a cohort study
    Chan, Oliver C. Y.
    Tang, Chung Ngai
    Lai, Eric C. H.
    Yang, George P. C.
    Li, Michael K. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2011, 18 (04) : 471 - 480
  • [2] Current Status of Robotic Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery
    Minamimura, Keisuke
    Aoki, Yuto
    Kaneya, Youhei
    Matsumoto, Satoshi
    Arai, Hiroki
    Kakinuma, Daisuke
    Oshiro, Yukio
    Kawano, Yoichi
    Watanabe, Masanori
    Nakamura, Yoshiharu
    Suzuki, Hideyuki
    Yoshida, Hiroshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NIPPON MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2024, 91 (01) : 10 - 19
  • [3] Hepatobiliary surgery: Lessons learned from live donor hepatectomy
    Elwood, David
    Pomposelli, James J.
    [J]. SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 86 (05) : 1207 - +
  • [4] Role of robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery: lessons learned from our initial experience
    Vicente, Emilio
    Quijano, Yolanda
    Ielpo, Benedetto
    Duran, Hipolito
    Diaz, Eduardo
    Fabra, Isabel
    Malave, Luis
    Caruso, Riccardo
    [J]. HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 16 (06) : 652 - 658
  • [5] Role of robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery:lessons learned from our initial experience
    Emilio Vicente
    Yolanda Quijano
    Benedetto Ielpo
    Hipolito Duran
    Eduardo Diaz
    Isabel Fabra
    Luis Malave
    Riccardo Caruso
    [J]. Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International, 2017, 16 (06) : 652 - 658
  • [6] Training in robotic Hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a step up approach
    Ahmad, Jawad
    [J]. HPB, 2022, 24 (06) : 806 - 808
  • [7] Ten years of paediatric robotic surgery: Lessons learned
    Salo, Martin
    Bonnor, Linda
    Graneli, Christina
    Stenstrom, Pernilla
    Anderberg, Magnus
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2022, 18 (04):
  • [8] Implementation of Robotic Surgery in a Pediatric Hospital: Lessons Learned
    Steyaert, Henri
    Van der Veken, Erwin
    Joyeux, Luc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 29 (02): : 136 - 140
  • [9] The management of hepatobiliary cystadenomas: lessons learned
    Martel, Guillaume
    Alsharif, Jamal
    Aubin, Jean-Michel
    Marginean, Celia
    Mimeault, Richard
    Fairfull-Smith, Robert J.
    Mohammad, Waleed M.
    Balaa, Fady K.
    [J]. HPB, 2013, 15 (08) : 617 - 622
  • [10] HEPATOBILIARY AND PANCREATIC SURGERY
    Soreide, Kjetil
    [J]. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LAEGEFORENING, 2019, 139 (04) : 374 - 374