Why More Choice is Sometimes Worse than Less

被引：0
|
作者：
Gordon-Solmon, Kerah [1 ]
机构：
[1] Queens Univ, Dept Philosophy, John Watson Hall, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
来源：
LAW AND PHILOSOPHY | 2017年 / 36卷 / 01期
关键词：
OPPORTUNITY;
D O I：
10.1007/s10982-016-9280-2
中图分类号：
B82 [伦理学（道德学）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
In this paper, I shall argue that personal autonomy requires the availability of an adequate range of valuable options from which to choose, but that the availability of a larger rather than a smaller set of valuable options can be inimical to, rather than supportive, of autonomy.
引用
收藏
页码：25 / 44
页数：20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Why More Choice is Sometimes Worse than Less
    Kerah Gordon-Solmon
    [J]. Law and Philosophy, 2017, 36 : 25 - 44
  • [2] Routing: Why less intelligence sometimes is more clever
    Saarland University, Germany
    [J]. IEEE Int. Symp. Broadband Multimedia Syst. Broadcast., BMSB - Final Programme,
  • [3] The paradox of choice: Why more is less
    Chen, S
    [J]. POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 2004, 75 (04): : 446 - 448
  • [4] The paradox of choice, why more is less
    Marck, Michael
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2010, 52 (05) : 699 - 701
  • [5] The paradox of choice: Why more is less
    Weeks, BO
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2004, 18 (04): : 170 - 171
  • [6] Why humans are (sometimes) less rational than other animals: Cognitive complexity and the axioms of rational choice
    Stanovich, Keith E.
    [J]. THINKING & REASONING, 2013, 19 (01) : 1 - 26
  • [7] Stress training and simulator complexity: why sometimes more is less
    Tichon, Jennifer G.
    Wallis, Guy M.
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 29 (05) : 459 - 466
  • [8] Sometimes less is more
    Spencer-Jones, Roland
    Bee, David
    Lamb, Iain
    Sneddon, Alison
    [J]. EDUCATION FOR PRIMARY CARE, 2015, 26 (06) : 419 - 421
  • [9] Sometimes less is more ...
    Bullimore, MA
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2003, 80 (07) : 475 - 475
  • [10] Sometimes less is more
    Lasota, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEMOCRACY, 1999, 10 (04): : 125 - 128
12345