Barriers Against Adoption of Electronic Health Record in Italy

被引:6
|
作者
Bonacina, Stefano [1 ]
Marceglia, Sara [1 ,2 ]
Pinciroli, Francesco [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Bioingn, E HealthLAB, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Fdn IRCCS CaGranda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Ctr Clin Neurostimolaz Neurotecnol & Disordini Mo, Milan, Italy
[3] City Univ London, Ctr Hlth Informat, London EC1V 0HB, England
关键词
electronic health record; barriers to EHR adoption; computerized; pragmatic framework; Delphi-like approach; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; MEDICAL-RECORDS; PATIENT RECORDS; CARE; IMPLEMENTATION; PHYSICIANS; SYSTEMS; IMPACT; STRATEGIES; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1260/2040-2295.2.4.509
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This work aims to expose the barriers which work against the satisfactory adoption and utilization of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in Italy. Experts from six operating areas were involved where barriers associated with practical daily use of EHRs might arise. Experts disclosed different barriers in their operating areas: the low interoperability of healthcare system infrastructures in diagnostic services; the lack of systems able to represent complex processes characterized by uncertainties in hospital wards; the unsatisfactory information exchange between heterogeneous healthcare providers in territorial healthcare; the lack of models and guidelines for administration process management; the lack of Health Information engineers who are recognized as professionals in Italian hospitals; the lack of domain vocabularies and ontologies for conceptual integration in clinical communication. Our findings suggest how future solutions must be designed considering the environment of specific areas.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 526
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Barriers to Electronic Health Record Adoption: a Systematic Literature Review
    Clemens Scott Kruse
    Caitlin Kristof
    Beau Jones
    Erica Mitchell
    Angelica Martinez
    [J]. Journal of Medical Systems, 2016, 40
  • [2] Barriers to Electronic Health Record Adoption: a Systematic Literature Review
    Kruse, Clemens Scott
    Kristof, Caitlin
    Jones, Beau
    Mitchell, Erica
    Martinez, Angelica
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2016, 40 (12)
  • [3] Educating Health Professionals about the Electronic Health Record (EHR): Removing the Barriers to Adoption
    Borycki, Elizabeth
    Joe, Ronald S.
    Armstrong, Brian
    Bellwood, Paule
    Campbell, Rebecca
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT & E-LEARNING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2011, 3 (01) : 51 - 62
  • [4] EEMI - An Electronic Health Record for Pediatricians: Adoption Barriers, Services and Use in Mexico
    Lavariega, Juan C.
    Garza, Roberto
    Gomez, Lorena G.
    Lara-Diaz, Victor J.
    Silva-Cavazos, Manuel J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND INFORMATICS, 2016, 11 (03) : 57 - 69
  • [5] Beyond Electronic Health Record Adoption
    Krawiec, Conrad
    [J]. METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2019, 58 (06) : 235 - 236
  • [6] Commentary on the adoption of the electronic health record
    Boris, Jeffrey R.
    [J]. CARDIOLOGY IN THE YOUNG, 2010, 20 : 140 - 142
  • [7] The Adoption of the Electronic Health Record by Physicians
    Al-Rayes, Saja A.
    Alumran, Arwa
    AlFayez, Weam
    [J]. METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2019, 58 (2-3) : 63 - 70
  • [8] Adoption of electronic health records and barriers
    Palabindala, Venkataraman
    Pamarthy, Amaleswari
    Jonnalagadda, Nageshwar Reddy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INTERNAL MEDICINE PERSPECTIVES, 2016, 6 (05):
  • [9] Primary Health Care: An Example of Electronic Medical Record Implementation and Barriers to Adoption and Use
    Rubio, Debora
    Castaneira, Matias N.
    Salguero, Maria G.
    Meraviglia, Marcos M.
    Arce, Debora P.
    Madrid, Francisco M.
    Ponce, Sergio D.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN BIOENGINEERING AND CLINICAL ENGINEERING, SABI 2022, 2024, 105 : 211 - 219
  • [10] Adoption factors of electronic health record systems
    Spatar, Daria
    Kok, Orhun
    Basoglu, Nuri
    Daim, Tugrul
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2019, 58