Diagnostic error and the patient's rights act

被引:0
|
作者
Mueller, S. [1 ]
Dralle, H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Lehrstuhl Strafrecht Strafprozessrecht Rechtsverg, D-06108 Halle, Saale, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Halle, Univ Klin & Poliklin Allgemein Viszeral & Gefassc, Halle, Saale, Germany
来源
CHIRURG | 2013年 / 84卷 / 02期
关键词
Liability law; Malpractice; Rule of evidence; Medical examination findings; Documentation duty;
D O I
10.1007/s00104-012-2448-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The question which party bears the burden of proof has significant influence on the result of a medical liability process. The party that bears the burden of proof and cannot provide the proof loses the lawsuit. Particularly important in this context is an omitted medical examination. In the case of such an omitted medical examination the courts may grant reversal of the burden of proof to patients in subsequent medical processes. The civil courts differentiate between a simple mistake or a grave error in treatment and furthermore, the medical examination has to be distinguished from the duty of diagnosis. In the new patients' rights act the burden of proof is established by law. Thereafter in principle the patient must still prove that the doctor made a mistake and that this was the cause of the damage.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 148
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Befunderhebungsfehler und PatientenrechtegesetzDiagnostic error and the patient’s rights act
    S. Müller
    H. Dralle
    [J]. Der Chirurg, 2013, 84 (2): : 143 - 148
  • [2] Patient rights act
    Siebert, H.
    Biberthaler, P.
    [J]. UNFALLCHIRURG, 2013, 116 (07): : 661 - 663
  • [3] The Patient Rights Act
    Heberer, J.
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGE, 2014, 9 (03): : 278 - 283
  • [4] Patient's rights act. Impact on treatment of emergency patients?
    Jaekel, C.
    [J]. NOTFALL & RETTUNGSMEDIZIN, 2013, 16 (08): : 593 - 597
  • [5] The patient rights act - a first overview
    Neu, J.
    [J]. UNFALLCHIRURG, 2013, 116 (07): : 658 - 660
  • [6] The Patient Rights Act A good Thing
    Bahner, B.
    [J]. GYNAKOLOGE, 2013, 46 (06): : 423 - 426
  • [7] The new Patient Rights Act An Overview
    Mueller, M.
    [J]. MKG-CHIRURG, 2013, 6 (02): : 134 - 138
  • [8] Anatomic pathology and patient safety: It's not an error: It's a diagnostic misadventure!
    Grzybicki, Dana Marie
    Raab, Stephen S.
    Janosky, Janine E.
    Vrbin-Turcsanyi, Colleen
    Bruno, Stephen
    Zarbo, Richard J.
    Stone, Chad H.
    Meier, Frederick A.
    Geisinger, Kim R.
    Garvin, A. Julian
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2008, 129 (01) : 167 - 168
  • [9] Rethinking paternalism: an exploration of responses to the Israel Patient's Rights Act 1996
    Waltho, Simon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2011, 37 (09) : 540 - 543
  • [10] Anatomic pathology and patient safety: It's not an error: It's a diagnostic misadventure! Reply
    Renshaw, Andrew
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2008, 129 (01) : 169 - 169