Development and psychometric properties the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation scale (BACE) related to people with mental ill health

被引:159
|
作者
Clement, Sarah [1 ]
Brohan, Elaine [1 ]
Jeffery, Debra [1 ]
Henderson, Claire [1 ]
Hatch, Stephani L. [2 ]
Thornicroft, Graham [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, Hlth Serv & Populat Res Dept, London SE5 8AF, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Weston Educ Ctr, Inst Psychiat, Dept Psychol Med, London SE5 9RJ, England
关键词
Measure; Barriers to care; Access; Health care seeking; Stigma; Psychometric; HELP-SEEKING BEHAVIOR; PERCEIVED STIGMA; SELF-STIGMA; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; PREFERENCES; ATTITUDES; PREVALENCE; DISORDERS; YOUNG; DISCRIMINATION;
D O I
10.1186/1471-244X-12-36
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Many people with mental illness do not seek or delay seeking care. This study aimed to develop, and provide an initial validation of, a comprehensive measure for assessing barriers to access to mental health care including a 'treatment stigma' subscale, and to present preliminary evidence about the prevalence of barriers experienced by adults currently or recently using secondary mental health services in the UK. Methods: The Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation scale (BACE) was developed from items in existing scales, systematic item reduction, and feedback from an expert group. It was completed in an online survey by 117 individuals aged 18 and over who had received care from secondary mental health services in the past 12 months. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity (correlation of treatment stigma subscale with the Stigma Scale for Receiving Psychological Help (SSRPH) and with the Internalised Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI)), respondent opinion and readability were assessed. Results: The BACE items were found to have acceptable test-retest reliability as all but one of the items exceeded the criterion for moderate agreement. The treatment stigma subscale had acceptable test-retest-reliability and good internal consistency. As hypothesised the subscale was significantly positively correlated with the SSRPH and the ISMI demonstrating convergent validity. The developmental process ensured content validity. Respondents gave the BACE a median rating of 8 on the 10-point quality scale. Readability scores indicated the measure can be understood by the average 11 to 12 year-old. The most highly endorsed barrier was 'concern that it might harm my chances when applying for jobs'. The scale was finalised into a 30-item measure with a 12-item treatment stigma subscale. Conclusions: There is preliminary evidence demonstrating the reliability, validity and acceptability of the BACE. It can be used to ascertain key barriers to access to mental health care which may help to identify potential interventions to increase care seeking and service use. Further research is needed to establish its factor analytic structure and population norms.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and psychometric properties the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation scale (BACE) related to people with mental ill health
    Sarah Clement
    Elaine Brohan
    Debra Jeffery
    Claire Henderson
    Stephani L Hatch
    Graham Thornicroft
    [J]. BMC Psychiatry, 12
  • [2] Barriers to access to care evaluation scale (bace-3) psychometric properties of the french version in a naturalistic ambulatory psychiatric community setting
    Caci, H.
    Boggero, M.
    Mallet, L.
    Bedira, N.
    Giordana, J. -Y
    [J]. ENCEPHALE-REVUE DE PSYCHIATRIE CLINIQUE BIOLOGIQUE ET THERAPEUTIQUE, 2023, 49 (04): : 393 - 398
  • [3] College Students' Barriers to Seeking Mental Health Counseling: Scale Development and Psychometric Evaluation
    Shea, Munyi
    Wong, Y. Joel
    Nguyen, Kimmy K.
    Gonzalez, Patricia D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 66 (05) : 626 - 639
  • [4] Development and Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of the Humanized Care Behaviors in Health Personnel Scale
    Vielma-Aguilera, Alexis
    Cova, Felix
    Ramirez-Vielma, Raul
    Bustos, Claudio
    Saldivia, Sandra
    Vaccari, Pamela
    Grandon, Pamela
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, : 169 - 177
  • [5] Development and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese mental health support scale
    Morgan, Amy
    Zhang, Zhongjie
    Lu, Shurong
    Reavley, Nicola
    He, Yanling
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MENTAL HEALTH, 2023,
  • [6] Barriers to Seek Professional Help for Mental Health Scale: Development and Psychometric Validation
    Sanghvi, Prachi
    Mehrotra, Seema
    Das, Sumit Kumar
    Sharma, Manoj Kumar
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [7] Development and preliminary psychometric properties of Mental Health Promotion Scale
    Kadioglu, H.
    Karaca, S.
    Eren, N.
    Yurt, S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 29 : 590 - 590
  • [8] Development and Psychometric Validation of the Mental Health-Related Barriers and Benefits to EXercise (MEX) Scale in Healthy Adults
    Madeleine L. Connolly
    Stephen C. Bowden
    Michaela C. Pascoe
    Nicholas T. Van Dam
    [J]. Sports Medicine - Open, 9
  • [9] Development and Psychometric Validation of the Mental Health-Related Barriers and Benefits to EXercise (MEX) Scale in Healthy Adults
    Connolly, Madeleine L. L.
    Bowden, Stephen C. C.
    Pascoe, Michaela C. C.
    Van Dam, Nicholas T. T.
    [J]. SPORTS MEDICINE-OPEN, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [10] The development and psychometric properties of a new scale to measure mental illness related stigma by health care providers: The opening minds scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC)
    Kassam, Aliya
    Papish, Andriyka
    Modgill, Geeta
    Patten, Scott
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 12