Aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

被引:6
|
作者
Wang, Yixiao [1 ]
Guo, Xiaojun [1 ]
Obore, Nathan [1 ]
Ding, Hongjuan [2 ]
Wu, Chengqian [2 ]
Yu, Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Affiliated Zhongda Hosp, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Nanjing Matern & Child Hlth Care Hosp, Nanjing Maternal & Child Hlth Inst, Womens Hosp, Nanjing, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
pregnancy; aspirin; preeclampsia; meta-analysis; systematic review; LOW-DOSE ASPIRIN; PREGNANCY-INDUCED HYPERTENSION; UTERINE ARTERY DOPPLER; HIGH-RISK; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; BLOOD-PRESSURE; PLACEBO; ULTRASOUND; THERAPY;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2022.936560
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The results of randomized controlled studies on aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia (PE) are conflicting, and some of the related meta-analyses also have limitations or flaws. Data sources: A search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, with no time or language restrictions. Study eligibility criteria: Randomized controlled studies comparing aspirin for the prevention of PE were conducted. Methods: Systematic reviews were performed according to the Cochrane Manual guidelines. A fixed-effects model or a random-effects model was chosen to calculate pooled relative risks with 95% confidence intervals based on the heterogeneity of the included studies. The study aimed to investigate the effect of aspirin on the development of PE in high-risk and general populations of women. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots. All included studies were assessed for bias by the Cochrane Manual of Bias Assessment. Subgroup analyses were conducted on the aspirin dose, time of initial aspirin intervention, and the region in which the research was conducted, to explore the effective dose of aspirin and time of initial aspirin intervention and to try to find sources of heterogeneity and publication bias. Results: A total of 39 articles were included, including 29 studies involving pregnant women at high risk for PE (20,133 patients) and 10 studies involving a general population of pregnant women (18,911 patients). Aspirin reduced the incidence of PE by 28% (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.62-0.83) in women at high risk for PE. Aspirin reduced the incidence of PE by 30% in the general population (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.95), but sensitivity analyses found that aspirin in the general population was not robust. A subgroup analysis showed that an aspirin dose of 75 mg/day (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.78) had a better protective effect than other doses. Starting aspirin at 12-16 weeks (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.53-0.74) of gestation or 17-28 weeks (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.89) reduced the incidence of PE by 38% in women at high risk for PE, but the results were more reliable for use at 12-16 weeks. Heterogeneity and publication bias of the included studies may be mainly due to the studies completed in Asia. Conclusion: Aspirin is recommended to be started at 12-16 weeks of pregnancy in women at high risk for PE. The optimal dose of aspirin to use is 75 mg/d.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Prevention of Preeclampsia with Aspirin in Multiple Gestations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Bergeron, Tessa S.
    Roberge, Stephanie
    Carpentier, Caroline
    Sibai, Baha
    McCaw-Binns, Affette
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2016, 33 (06) : 605 - 610
  • [3] Role of pravastatin in the prevention of preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials
    Akbar, Muhammad Ilham Aldika
    Wungu, Citrawati Dyah Kencono
    Ernawati
    Dekker, Gus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACY & PHARMACOGNOSY RESEARCH, 2024, 12 (03): : 573 - 585
  • [4] Aspirin in the prevention of preeclampsia A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis
    Mkhize, P. Z.
    Phoswa, W. N.
    Khaki, O. P.
    Dorsamy, V
    Moodley, J.
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (48)
  • [5] Influence of aspirin on prevention of colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Abdullah A. Ghaddaf
    Muhammad Aziz
    Mohammed S. Alomari
    Ahmed S. Abdulhamid
    Fahad A. Alharbi
    Abdullah N. Mullah
    Syed Fasial Zaidi
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2021, 36 : 1711 - 1722
  • [6] Influence of aspirin on prevention of colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ghaddaf, Abdullah A.
    Aziz, Muhammad
    Alomari, Mohammed S.
    Abdulhamid, Ahmed S.
    Alharbi, Fahad A.
    Mullah, Abdullah N.
    Zaidi, Syed Fasial
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 36 (08) : 1711 - 1722
  • [7] The role of aspirin dose on the prevention of preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Roberge, Stephanie
    Nicolaides, Kypros
    Demers, Suzanne
    Hyett, Jon
    Chaillet, Nils
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (02) : 110 - 120
  • [8] Aspirin for prevention of preeclampsia and adverse perinatal outcome in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    D'Antonio, Francesco
    Khalil, Asma
    Rizzo, Giuseppe
    Fichera, Anna
    Herrera, Mauricio
    Buca, Danilo
    Morelli, Roberta
    Cerra, Chiara
    Orabona, Rossana
    Martellucci, Cecilia Acuti
    Flacco, Maria Elena
    Prefumo, Federico
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2023, 5 (02)
  • [9] Enoxaparin (or plus aspirin) for the prevention of recurrent miscarriage: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
    Lin, Tao
    Chen, Yumei
    Cheng, Xuanyu
    Li, Na
    Sheng, Xiaolu
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 234 : 53 - 57
  • [10] Enoxaparin (or plus aspirin) for the prevention of recurrent miscarriage: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
    Solt, Ido
    Ben David, Chen
    Carp, Howard
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 239 : 67 - 68