Medication intensification in diabetes in rural primary care: a cluster-randomised effectiveness trial

被引:13
|
作者
Billue, Katherine L. [1 ]
Safford, Monika M. [1 ]
Salanitro, Amanda H. [2 ,3 ]
Houston, Thomas K. [4 ,5 ]
Curry, William [1 ,6 ]
Kim, Yongin [1 ]
Allison, Jeroan J. [5 ]
Estrada, Carlos A. [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
[2] VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare Geriatr Res Educ C, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Nashville, TN USA
[4] Bedford Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Beford, MA USA
[5] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Worcester, MA USA
[6] Birmingham Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Birmingham, MA USA
[7] Birmingham VAMC, Vet Affairs Natl Qual Scholars Program, Birmingham, MA USA
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2012年 / 2卷 / 05期
关键词
ACHIEVABLE BENCHMARKS; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; PHYSICIAN FEEDBACK; CLINICAL INERTIA; INTERVENTION; PATIENT; BENEFICIARIES; HYPERTENSION; FRAMEWORK; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000959
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the effectiveness of a provider-based intervention to improve medication intensification among patients with diabetes. Design: Effectiveness cluster-randomised trial. Baseline and follow-up cross-sections of diabetes physicians' patients. Setting: Eleven U.S. Southeastern states, 2006-2008. Participants: 205 Rural primary care physicians, 95 completed the study. Intervention: Multicomponent interactive intervention including web-based continuing medical education (CME), performance feedback and quality improvement tools. Primary outcome measures: Medication intensification, a dose increase of an existing medication or the addition of a new class of medication for glucose, blood pressure and lipids control on any of the three most recent office visits. Results: Of 364 physicians attempting to register, 102 were randomised to the intervention and 103 to the control arms; 95 physicians (intervention, n=48; control, n=47) provided data on their 1182 of their patients at baseline (intervention, n=715; control, n=467) and 945 patients at follow-up (intervention, n=479; control, n=466). For A1c control, medication intensification increased in both groups (intervention, pre 26.4% vs post 32.6%, p=0.022; control, pre 24.8% vs post 31.1%, p=0.033) (intervention, adjusted OR (AOR) 1.37; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.76; control, AOR 1.41 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.89)); however, we observed no incremental benefit solely due to the intervention (group-by-time interaction, p=0.948). Among patients with the worst glucose control (A1c >9%), intensification increased in both groups (intervention, pre 34.8% vs post 62.5%, p=0.002; control, pre 35.7% vs post 61.4%, p=0.008). Conclusions: A wide-reach, low-intensity, web-based interactive multicomponent intervention had no significant incremental effect on medication intensification for control of glucose, blood pressure or lipids for patients with diabetes of physicians practising in the rural Southeastern USA. Trial registration: NCT00403091.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DIABETES MEDICATION INTENSIFICATION IN RURAL PRIMARY CARE PRACTICES: A CLUSTER-RANDOMIZED EFFECTIVENESS TRIAL
    Billue, K.
    Safford, M.
    Salanitro, A.
    Houston, T.
    Curry, W.
    Kim, Y.
    Allison, J.
    Estrada, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 60 (01) : 460 - 461
  • [2] Population effectiveness of opportunistic chlamydia testing in primary care in Australia: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
    Hocking, Jane S.
    Temple-Smith, Meredith
    Guy, Rebecca
    Donovan, Basil
    Braat, Sabine
    Law, Matthew
    Gunn, Jane
    Regan, David
    Vaisey, Alaina
    Bulfone, Liliana
    Kaldor, John
    Fairley, Christopher K.
    Low, Nicola
    [J]. LANCET, 2018, 392 (10156): : 1413 - 1422
  • [3] Effectiveness of a PLISSIT model intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care: design of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
    Anne Rutte
    Patricia van Oppen
    Giel Nijpels
    Frank J. Snoek
    Paul Enzlin
    Peter Leusink
    Petra J. M. Elders
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 16
  • [4] Effectiveness of an intervention in primary care to prevent type 2 diabetes in people with impaired fasting glucose, a cluster-randomised controlled trial
    Hesselink, A. E.
    Bilo, H. J. G.
    Rutten, G. E. H.
    Slootmaker, S. M.
    de Weert, I.
    Martens, M.
    Jonkers, R.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2013, 56 : S165 - S165
  • [5] Effectiveness of a PLISSIT model intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care: design of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
    Rutte, Anne
    van Oppen, Patricia
    Nijpels, Giel
    Snoek, Frank J.
    Enzlin, Paul
    Leusink, Peter
    Elders, Petra J. M.
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2015, 16
  • [6] A primary care specialist genetics service: a cluster-randomised factorial trial
    Westwood, Greta
    Pickering, Ruth
    Latter, Sue
    Little, Paul
    Gerard, Karen
    Lucassen, Anneke
    Temple, Karen
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2012, 62 (596):
  • [7] Effectiveness of Electronic Reminders to Improve Medication Adherence in Tuberculosis Patients: A Cluster-Randomised Trial
    Liu, Xiaoqiu
    Lewis, James J.
    Zhang, Hui
    Lu, Wei
    Zhang, Shun
    Zheng, Guilan
    Bai, Liqiong
    Li, Jun
    Li, Xue
    Chen, Hongguang
    Liu, Mingming
    Chen, Rong
    Chi, Junying
    Lu, Jian
    Huan, Shitong
    Cheng, Shiming
    Wang, Lixia
    Jiang, Shiwen
    Chin, Daniel P.
    Fielding, Katherine L.
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2015, 12 (09)
  • [8] Effectiveness of a training intervention to improve the management of vertigo in primary care: a multicentre cluster-randomised trial, VERTAP
    Patino, Jenniffer Elizabeth Perez
    Moreno, Jose Lluis Ballve
    Matos, Yolanda Rando
    Ortega, Jesus Almeda
    Puertolas, Oriol Cunillera
    Munoz, Ricard Carrillo
    Balboa, Ivan Villar
    Compta, Xavier Gonzalez
    Agudelo, Olga Lucia Arias
    Munoz, Sebastia Calero
    Rodriguez, Vanessa Monforte
    Cortes, Anna Navarro
    Rodriguez, Eva Peguero
    [J]. TRIALS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [9] Effectiveness of a training intervention to improve the management of vertigo in primary care: a multicentre cluster-randomised trial, VERTAP
    Jenniffer Elizabeth Pérez Patiño
    José Lluís Ballvé Moreno
    Yolanda Rando Matos
    Jesús Almeda Ortega
    Oriol Cunillera Puértolas
    Ricard Carrillo Muñoz
    Iván Villar Balboa
    Xavier González Compta
    Olga Lucía Arias Agudelo
    Sebastiá Calero Muñoz
    Vanessa Monforte Rodríguez
    Anna Navarro Cortes
    Eva Peguero Rodríguez
    [J]. Trials, 23
  • [10] Reduction of potentially inappropriate medication in the elderly: design of a cluster-randomised controlled trial in German primary care practices (RIME)
    Thiem, Ulrich
    Wilm, Stefan
    Greiner, Wolfgang
    Rudolf, Henrik
    Trampisch, Hans-Joachim
    Mueller, Christiane
    Theile, Gudrun
    Thuermann, Petra A.
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 11