Bi-objective mountain railway alignment optimization incorporating seismic risk assessment

被引:32
|
作者
Song, Taoran [1 ,2 ]
Pu, Hao [1 ,2 ]
Schonfeld, Paul [3 ]
Zhang, Hong [1 ,2 ]
Li, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Jianping [4 ]
Wang, Jie [5 ,6 ]
Wang, Jianxi [7 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Changsha 410075, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Engn Lab High Speed Railway Construct, Changsha, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Maryland, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, College Pk, MD USA
[4] China Railway Eryuan Engn Grp Co Ltd, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[5] China Railway First Survey & Design Inst Grp Co L, Xian, Peoples R China
[6] State Key Lab Rail Transit Engn Informatizat FSDI, Xian, Peoples R China
[7] Shijiazhuang Tiedao Univ, Key Lab Rd & Railway Engn Safety Control, Minist Educ, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
GENETIC ALGORITHMS; HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT; DISTANCE TRANSFORM; COST OPTIMIZATION; HIGHWAY; SELECTION; NETWORKS; MODEL; FRAGILITY; SCENARIO;
D O I
10.1111/mice.12607
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Mountain railway alignment optimization is known as a very complex engineering problem that should consider many factors, such as drastically undulating terrain, geological hazard impacts, and additional constraints. Moreover, many mountain railway projects are located in earthquake-prone regions and hence are greatly threatened by seismic activity. Thus far, most alignment optimization studies aim at finding the least-cost solutions within budget but slight attention has been paid to reducing the complex seismic risk through optimization. In this paper, the first known quantitative seismic risk assessment model for railway alignment optimization is presented, which combines probabilistic seismic fragility analysis and probabilistic seismic loss analysis. Three methods for fragility analysis of bridge, tunnel, and earthwork sections are designed and a specific event tree is developed for seismic loss analysis. Moreover, multiple preliminary constraints are specified for alignments traversing active faults. Afterwards, the seismic risk assessment model is combined with a least-cost model to formulate a bi-objective optimization model. To solve it, a particle swarm optimization algorithm is improved by blending the crowding distance computation (CDC) and, especially, a novel marginal benefit analysis (MBA) to search for pareto-optimal solutions during optimization. A prescreening and repairing operator is also designed to handle the fault constraints. Finally, when applying the proposed procedure to a complex realistic railway case, the results show that the hybrid CDC+MBA bi-objective solver can find better pareto-optimal solutions than the generic CDC method. Besides, detailed data analysis shows that the present method can produce less expensive as well as safer solutions than the best alignment designed by experienced human engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 163
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mountain railway alignment optimization considering geological impacts: A cost-hazard bi-objective model
    Song, Taoran
    Pu, Hao
    Schonfeld, Paul
    Zhang, Hong
    Li, Wei
    Hu, Jianping
    Wang, Jie
    [J]. COMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2020, 35 (12) : 1365 - 1386
  • [2] Minimizing costs and carbon emissions in railway alignment optimization: A bi-objective model
    Pu, Hao
    Cai, Ling
    Song, Taoran
    Schonfeld, Paul
    Hu, Jianping
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 116
  • [3] Bi-objective optimization for road vertical alignment design
    Akhmet, Ayazhan
    Hare, Warren
    Lucet, Yves
    [J]. COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2022, 143
  • [4] Antlion optimization algorithm for pairwise structural alignment with bi-objective functions
    Rani, R. Ranjani
    Ramyachitra, D.
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2020, 32 (11): : 7079 - 7096
  • [5] Antlion optimization algorithm for pairwise structural alignment with bi-objective functions
    R. Ranjani Rani
    D. Ramyachitra
    [J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2020, 32 : 7079 - 7096
  • [6] A bi-objective optimization framework for three-dimensional road alignment design
    Hirpa, D.
    Hare, W.
    Lucet, Y.
    Pushak, Y.
    Tesfamariam, S.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2016, 65 : 61 - 78
  • [7] Sustainability-based Bi-objective Optimization for Seismic Retrofit of Bridge Networks Considering Risk Attitudes
    Dong, Y.
    Frangopol, D. M.
    Sabatino, S.
    [J]. LIFE-CYCLE OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS: DESIGN, ASSESSMENT, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, : 606 - 613
  • [8] Bi-objective rescue path selection optimization for mine fires based on quantitative risk assessment
    Shi, Xiuli
    Gai, Wenmei
    Xu, Ke
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2022, 146
  • [9] Classification of ADHD with bi-objective optimization
    Shao, Lizhen
    Xu, Yadong
    Fu, Dongmei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2018, 84 : 164 - 170
  • [10] Bi-objective stochastic model for the design of biofuel supply chains incorporating risk
    Aboytes-Ojeda, Mario
    Castillo-Villar, Krystel K.
    Cardona-Valdes, Yajaira
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 202