Imaging for detection of osteomyelitis in people with diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:31
|
作者
Llewellyn, Alexis [1 ]
Kraft, Jeannette [2 ]
Holton, Colin [2 ]
Harden, Melissa [1 ]
Simmonds, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, York, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Osteomyelitis; Diabetic foot ulcers; Diagnosis; Imaging tests; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; TO-BONE TEST; UNSUSPECTED OSTEOMYELITIS; F-18-FDG PET; DIAGNOSIS; SCINTIGRAPHY; MRI; SPECT/CT; INFECTION; ACCURACY; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109215
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Osteomyelitis is an infection of the bone which can occur in people with diabetic foot ulcers. It can be diagnosed using X-rays, ultrasound, scintigraphy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET). Objectives: To review the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of imaging tests to diagnose osteomyelitis in people with diabetic foot ulcers. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. MEDLINE, EMBASE and other databases were searched to July 2018. Risk of bias was evaluated. Diagnostic accuracy was estimated using bivariate meta-analyses. Results: Thirty-six studies were included in the meta-analysis. Eight studies were at high risk of bias MRI had high diagnostic accuracy (22 studies: 96.4 % sensitivity (95 % CI 90.7-98.7); 83.8 % specificity (76.0-89.5)). PET scans also had high accuracy (6 studies: 84.3 % sensitivity (52.8-96.3); 92.8 % specificity (75.7-98.2)), and possibly also SPECT, but with few studies (3 studies: 95.6 % sensitivity (76.0-99.3); 55.1 % specificity (19.3-86.3)). Scintigraphy (17 studies: 84.2 % sensitivity (76.8-89.6); 67.7 % specificity (56.2-77.4)), and X-rays (16 studies: 61.9 % sensitivity (50.5-72.1); 78.3 % specificity (62.9-88.5)) had generally inferior diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions: MRI and PET both reliably diagnose osteomyelitis in diabetic foot ulcer patients. SPECT may also have good diagnostic accuracy, although evidence is limited. This review confirms most current guidelines, showing that MRI may be the preferable test in most cases, given its wider availability and the lack of potentially harmful ionising radiation.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sharma, Harman
    Sharma, Sandhli
    Krishnan, Anirudh
    Yuan, Daniel
    Vangaveti, Venkat N.
    Malabu, Usman H.
    Haleagrahara, Nagaraja
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (04):
  • [2] A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjunctive therapies in diabetic foot ulcers
    Elraiyah, Tarig
    Tsapas, Apostolos
    Prutsky, Gabriela
    Domecq, Juan Pablo
    Hasan, Rim
    Firwana, Belal
    Nabhan, Mohammed
    Prokop, Larry
    Hingorani, Anil
    Claus, Paul L.
    Steinkraus, Lawrence W.
    Murad, Mohammad Hassan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 63 (02) : 46S - U75
  • [3] Risk factors for diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tang, W. H.
    Zhao, Y. N.
    Cheng, Z. X.
    Xu, J. X.
    Zhang, Y.
    Liu, X. M.
    [J]. VASCULAR, 2024, 32 (03) : 661 - 669
  • [4] A meta-analysis and systematic review of photodynamic therapy for diabetic foot ulcers
    Hou, Chunliu
    Zhang, Lei
    Wang, Lifeng
    Zhao, Sai
    Nie, Jing
    Lv, Mo
    Zhang, Wenjie
    Su, Xuesen
    Tian, Shouyuan
    Li, Yan
    [J]. PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2024, 48
  • [5] Percutaneous Bone Biopsy for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Schechter, Marcos C.
    Ali, Mohammed K.
    Risk, Benjamin B.
    Singer, Adam D.
    Santamarina, Gabriel
    Rogers, Hannah K.
    Rajani, Ravi R.
    Umpierrez, Guillermo
    Fayfman, Maya
    Kempker, Russell R.
    [J]. OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 7 (10): : 1 - 9
  • [6] Update of biomarkers to diagnose diabetic foot osteomyelitis: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Ansert, Elizabeth A.
    Tarricone, Arthur N.
    Coye, Tyler L.
    Crisologo, Peter A.
    Truong, David
    Suludere, Mehmet A.
    Lavery, Lawrence A.
    [J]. WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2024, 32 (04) : 366 - 376
  • [7] Is there an association between anemia and diabetic foot ulcers? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yammine, Kaissar
    Hayek, Fady
    Assi, Chahine
    [J]. WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2021, 29 (03) : 432 - 442
  • [8] Effect of thermometry on the prevention of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    de Araujo, Acucena Leal
    da Silva Negreiros, Francisca Diana
    Florencio, Raquel Sampaio
    Paz de Oliveira, Sherida Karanini
    Vilarouca da Silva, Ana Roberta
    Magalhaes Moreira, Thereza Maria
    [J]. REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2022, 30
  • [9] Global recurrence rates in diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fu, Xue-Lei
    Ding, Hui
    Miao, Wei-Wei
    Mao, Chun-Xing
    Zhan, Min-Qi
    Chen, Hong-Lin
    [J]. DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2019, 35 (06)
  • [10] Electromechanical therapy in diabetic foot ulcers patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rathnayake, Ayeshmanthe
    Saboo, Apoorva
    Vangaveti, Venkat
    Malabu, Usman
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND METABOLIC DISORDERS, 2023, 22 (02) : 967 - 984