A Novel Machine Learning Approach Combined with Optimization Models for Eco-efficiency Evaluation

被引:55
|
作者
Mirmozaffari, Mirpouya [1 ]
Yazdani, Maziar [2 ]
Boskabadi, Azam [3 ]
Dolatsara, Hamidreza Ahady [4 ]
Kabirifar, Kamyar [2 ]
Golilarz, Noorbakhsh Amiri [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Arlington, Dept Ind Mfg & Syst Engn, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[2] Univ New South Wales, Fac Built Environm, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[3] Washington State Univ, Carson Coll Business, Dept Finance & Management Sci, Pullman, WA 99163 USA
[4] Clark Univ, Sch Management, Worcester, MA 01610 USA
[5] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Chengdu 611731, Peoples R China
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 15期
关键词
machine learning; optimization; clustering algorithms; data envelopment analysis; FDH two stage-model; Eco-efficiency; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; FRONTIER VISUALIZATION; UNDESIRABLE OUTPUTS; SCALE; CHINA; PERFORMANCE; NETWORK; ENERGY;
D O I
10.3390/app10155210
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Machine learning approaches have been developed rapidly and also they have been involved in many academic findings and discoveries. Additionally, they are widely assessed in numerous industries such as cement companies. Cement companies in developing countries, despite many profits such as valuable mines, face many challenges. Optimization, as a key part of machine learning, has attracted more attention. The main purpose of this paper is to combine a novel Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach in optimization at the first step to find the Decision-Making Unit (DMU) with innovative clustering algorithms in machine learning at the second step introduce the model and algorithm with higher accuracy. At the optimization section with converting two-stage to a simple standard single-stage model, 24 cement companies from five developing countries over 2014-2019 are compared. Window-DEA analysis is used since it leads to increase judgment on the consequences, mainly when applied to small samples followed by allowing year-by-year comparisons of the results. Applying window analysis can be beneficial for managers to expand their comparison and evaluation. To find the most accurate model CCR (Charnes, Cooper and Rhodes model), BBC (Banker, Charnes and Cooper model) and Free Disposal Hull (FDH) DEA model for measuring the efficiency of decision processes are used. FDH model allows the free disposability to construct the production possibility set. At the machine learning section, a novel three-layers data mining filtering pre-processes proposed by expert judgment for clustering algorithms to increase the accuracy and to eliminate unrelated attributes and data. Finally, the most efficient company, best performance model and the most accurate algorithm are introduced. The results indicate that the 22nd company has the highest efficiency score with an efficiency score of 1 for all years. FDH model has the highest efficiency scores during all periods compared with other suggested models. K-means algorithm receives the highest accuracy in all three suggested filtering layers. The BCC and CCR models have the second and third places, respectively. The hierarchical clustering and density-based clustering algorithms have the second and third places, correspondingly.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A novel artificial intelligent approach: comparison of machine learning tools and algorithms based on optimization DEA Malmquist productivity index for eco-efficiency evaluation
    Mirmozaffari, Mirpouya
    Shadkam, Elham
    Khalili, Seyyed Mohammad
    Kabirifar, Kamyar
    Yazdani, Reza
    Asgari Gashteroodkhani, Tayyebeh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2021, 15 (03) : 523 - 550
  • [2] Formulation of guidelines for ICT eco-efficiency evaluation at the Japan forum on eco-efficiency
    Origuchi, Takeshi
    Sawada, Takashi
    Nishi, Shiro
    [J]. NTT Technical Review, 2007, 5 (03): : 18 - 24
  • [3] Data driven eco-efficiency evaluation and optimization in industrial production
    Liu, Conghu
    Gao, Mengdi
    Zhu, Guang
    Zhang, Cuixia
    Zhang, Pan
    Chen, Jianqing
    Cai, Wei
    [J]. ENERGY, 2021, 224
  • [4] A Parametric Approach to Estimating Eco-Efficiency
    Orea, Luis
    Wall, Alan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 68 (03) : 901 - 907
  • [5] Performance evaluation and eco-efficiency coefficients
    Carvalho, LN
    de Matos, ERJ
    Moraes, RO
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITY: URBAN REGENERATION AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2000, 9 : 193 - 202
  • [6] Evaluation of agriculture eco-efficiency in Latvia
    Gancone, Agita
    Pubule, Jelena
    Rosa, Marika
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE - ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES (CONECT 2017), 2017, 128 : 309 - 315
  • [7] Eco-efficiency evaluation of the eco-industrial cluster
    Hu, Allen H.
    Shih, Sin-How
    Hsu, Chia-Wei
    [J]. FOURTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSCIOUS DESIGN AND INVERSE MANUFACTURING, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 775 - 778
  • [8] Eco-efficiency of the Western Taiwan Straits Economic Zone: An evaluation based on a novel eco-efficiency model and empirical analysis of influencing factors
    Zhu, Wei
    Xu, Lingxing
    Tang, Lina
    Xiang, Xueqin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 234 : 638 - 652
  • [9] Regional eco-efficiency indicators -: a participatory approach
    Mickwitz, Per
    Melanen, Matti
    Rosenstrom, Ulla
    Seppala, Jyri
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2006, 14 (18) : 1603 - 1611
  • [10] Fujitsu's approach for eco-efficiency factor
    Oikawa, S
    Ebisu, K
    Fuse, K
    [J]. FUJITSU SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 41 (02): : 236 - 241