Lean methane premixed combustion over a catalytically stabilized zirconia foam burner

被引:5
|
作者
Feng, X. B. [1 ]
Qu, Z. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Energy & Power Engn, MOE Key Lab Thermofluid Sci & Engn, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Catalytic combustion; zirconia foam; equivalence ratio; flame stability limit; pollutant emission; POROUS-MEDIA; THERMAL EFFICIENCY; MIXED OXIDES; CATALYSTS; OXIDATION; ALUMINA; OXYGEN; REDUCTION; DIAMETERS; PELLETS;
D O I
10.1080/15435075.2016.1206014
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study experimentally investigates lean methane/air premixed combustion in a catalytic zirconia foam burner. The burner is packed with an inert perforated alumina plate at the inlet preheating zone and with catalytic zirconia foams at the combustion zone. Catalytic foams are prepared by using a modified perovskite catalyst (LaMn0.4Co0.6O3), in which the transition metal ion Co is partially substituted by Mn and supported by inert zirconia foam. Results indicate that the flame stability limits of both catalytic and inert burners expand with increasing equivalence ratios. The stable combustion region of the catalytic burner is larger than that of the inert burner. The heterogeneous catalytic combustion effect can decrease and increase the lower and upper flame stability limits, respectively. The central temperatures of the flame fronts are higher in the catalytic burner than in the inert burner. The pressure drops of the catalytic burner are almost equal to those of the inert burner in cold flows but are significantly higher than those in the inert burner in reaction flows. Less amounts of carbon monoxide, nitric oxides, and unburned hydrocarbon emissions are detected in the catalytic burner relative to the inert burner. The thermal radiation efficiencies of the catalytic burner vary between 0.24 and 0.39 and are favorably superior to those of the inert burner, ranging from 0.11 to 0.20.
引用
收藏
页码:1451 / 1459
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Methane combustion in a catalytically stabilized thermal burner
    [J]. Barresi, Antonello A., 1600, (50):
  • [2] METHANE COMBUSTION IN A CATALYTICALLY STABILIZED THERMAL BURNER
    BARRESI, AA
    HUNG, SL
    PFEFFERLE, LD
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL AND THE BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 1992, 50 (03): : 123 - 131
  • [3] Combustion of hydrogen-enriched methane in a lean premixed swirl-stabilized burner
    Schefer, R.W.
    Wicksall, D.M.
    Agrawal, A.K.
    [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2002, 29 (01) : 843 - 851
  • [4] Combustion of hydrogen-enriched methane in a lean premixed swirl-stabilized burner
    Schefer, RW
    Wicksall, DM
    Agrawal, AK
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2002, 29 : 843 - 851
  • [5] Catalytic combustion of lean premixed mixture in catalytically stabilized thermal combustor
    Seo, YS
    Kang, SK
    Shin, HD
    [J]. COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 145 (1-6) : 17 - 35
  • [6] Subadiabatic combustion of premixed gas in ceramic foam burner
    Dai, Huaming
    Lin, Baiquan
    Zhai, Cheng
    Hong, Yidu
    Li, Qingzhao
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2015, 91 : 318 - 329
  • [7] Methane/air premixed combustion in a two-layer porous burner with different foam materials
    Gao, H. B.
    Qu, Z. G.
    Feng, X. B.
    Tao, W. Q.
    [J]. FUEL, 2014, 115 : 154 - 161
  • [8] Lean methane flame stability in a premixed generic swirl burner: Isothermal flow and and atmospheric combustion characterization
    Runyon, Jon
    Marsh, Richard
    Bowen, Philip
    Pugh, Daniel
    Giles, Anthony
    Morris, Steven
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE, 2018, 92 : 125 - 140
  • [9] Regimes of Lean Premixed Combustion of Gas Fuel in a Radial Burner
    E. Yu. Gorelikov
    I. V. Litvinov
    S. I. Shtork
    [J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 2022, 58 : 521 - 530
  • [10] Regimes of Lean Premixed Combustion of Gas Fuel in a Radial Burner
    Gorelikov, E. Yu
    Litvinov, I., V
    Shtork, S., I
    [J]. COMBUSTION EXPLOSION AND SHOCK WAVES, 2022, 58 (05) : 521 - 530