This paper discusses the nature of the category of reality status, or realis/irrealis. Although the terms realis and irrealis are widely used in the typological literature and in grammatical descriptions, there is much variation in how these terms are used. This variation means that the terms realis and irrealis are not easily comparable from one study to the next. The question then is: is there such a category as reality status? This question is looked at via an examination of various languages, grammatical domains and different frameworks. The conclusion is that we may not be able to posit a typologically valid category of reality status, but we may be able to approach the matter through a bottom-up method of examining individual languages and language families, both synchronically and diachronically. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机构:
Medstar Union Mem Hosp, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD USAMedstar Union Mem Hosp, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD USA
Kanwal, Arjun
Agarwala, Anandita
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Cardiovasc, St Louis, MO 63110 USAMedstar Union Mem Hosp, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD USA
Agarwala, Anandita
Yang, Eugene
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Washington, Div Cardiol Carl & Renee Behnke Endowed Professor, Sch Med, Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USAMedstar Union Mem Hosp, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD USA
机构:
Univ Nottingham, Sch Med, Queens Med Ctr, Div Rehabil & Ageing,Trent Local Res Network Stro, Nottingham NG7 2UH, EnglandUniv Nottingham, Sch Med, Queens Med Ctr, Div Rehabil & Ageing,Trent Local Res Network Stro, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England