Adhoc electromagnetic compatibility testing of non-implantable medical devices and radio frequency identification

被引:8
|
作者
Seidman, Seth J.
Guag, Joshua W.
机构
[1] 10903 New Hampshire Ave, White Oak Bldg 62, Silver Spring
来源
关键词
Electromagnetic compatibility; Electromagnetic interference; EMC; EMI; Radio-frequency identification; RFID; Medical device;
D O I
10.1186/1475-925X-12-71
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: The use of radiofrequency identification (RFID) in healthcare is increasing and concerns for electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) pose one of the biggest obstacles for widespread adoption. Numerous studies have documented that RFID can interfere with medical devices. The majority of past studies have concentrated on implantable medical devices such as implantable pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). This study examined EMC between RFID systems and non-implantable medical devices. Methods: Medical devices were exposed to 19 different RFID readers and one RFID active tag. The RFID systems used covered 5 different frequency bands: 125-134 kHz (low frequency (LF)); 13.56 MHz (high frequency (HF)); 433 MHz; 915 MHz (ultra high frequency (UHF])) and 2.4 GHz. We tested three syringe pumps, three infusion pumps, four automatic external defibrillators (AEDs), and one ventilator. The testing procedure is modified from American National Standards Institute (ANSI) C63.18, Recommended Practice for an On-Site, Ad Hoc Test Method for Estimating Radiated Electromagnetic Immunity of Medical Devices to Specific Radio-Frequency Transmitters. Results: For syringe pumps, we observed electromagnetic interference (EMI) during 13 of 60 experiments (22%) at a maximum distance of 59 cm. For infusion pumps, we observed EMI during 10 of 60 experiments (17%) at a maximum distance of 136 cm. For AEDs, we observed EMI during 18 of 75 experiments (24%) at a maximum distance of 51 cm. The majority of the EMI observed was classified as probably clinically significant or left the device inoperable. No EMI was observed for all medical devices tested during exposure to 433 MHz (two readers, one active tag) or 2.4 GHz RFID (two readers). Conclusion: Testing confirms that RFID has the ability to interfere with critical medical equipment. Hospital staff should be aware of the potential for medical device EMI caused by RFID systems and should be encouraged to perform on-site RF immunity tests prior to RFID system deployment or prior to placing new medical devices in an RFID environment. The methods presented in this paper are time-consuming and burdensome and suggest the need for standard test methods for assessing the immunity of medical devices to RFID systems.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adhoc electromagnetic compatibility testing of non-implantable medical devices and radio frequency identification
    Seth J Seidman
    Joshua W Guag
    [J]. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 12
  • [2] Medical implantable devices and electromagnetic compatibility
    Andrivet, P
    [J]. ARCHIVES DES MALADIES DU COEUR ET DES VAISSEAUX, 2003, 96 : 57 - 64
  • [3] A Radio Frequency Magnetic Field Generator for Magnetic Resonance Compatibility Testing of Active Implantable Medical Devices
    Chen, Qiaoyan
    Wang, Jiasheng
    Rong, Xinwei
    Li, Ye
    [J]. 2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON RADIO FREQUENCY AND ANTENNA TECHNOLOGIES, IWRF&AT 2024, 2024, : 80 - 83
  • [4] Feasibility results of an electromagnetic compatibility test protocol to evaluate medical devices to radio frequency identification exposure
    Seidman, Seth J.
    Bekdash, Omar
    Guag, Joshua
    Mehryar, Maryam
    Booth, Paul
    Frisch, Paul
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2014, 13 : 1 - 8
  • [5] Feasibility results of an electromagnetic compatibility test protocol to evaluate medical devices to radio frequency identification exposure
    Seth J Seidman
    Omar Bekdash
    Joshua Guag
    Maryam Mehryar
    Paul Booth
    Paul Frisch
    [J]. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 13
  • [6] Electromagnetic Compatibility Analysis of RFID and Implantable Medical Devices
    Spano, Ivan Luigi
    Serpi, Alessandro
    Fanti, Alessandro
    Nissardi, Vincenzo
    Lai, Andrea
    Caredda, Francesco Valentino
    Orru, Pier Francesco
    Mazzarella, Giuseppe
    Marongiu, Ignazio
    Gatto, Gianluca
    [J]. 2014 22ND TELECOMMUNICATIONS FORUM TELFOR (TELFOR), 2014, : 818 - 821
  • [7] Development of a non-implantable electromagnetic hearing aid
    Hamanishi, S
    Wada, H
    Koike, T
    Kobayashi, T
    Honda, N
    Goode, RL
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD SYMPOSIUM ON MIDDLE EAR MECHANICS IN RESEARCH AND OTOLOGY, 2004, : 362 - 369
  • [8] Radiofrequency identification and medical devices: the regulatory framework on electromagnetic compatibility. Part II: active implantable medical devices
    Mattei, Eugenio
    Censi, Federica
    Triventi, Michele
    Bartolini, Pietro
    Calcagnini, Giovanni
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2012, 9 (03) : 289 - 297
  • [9] Electromagnetic Compatibility Implantable Pacemaker Testing
    Hajovsky, Radovan
    Penhaker, Marek
    Capek, Ondrej
    Cernohorsky, Jindrich
    Skapa, Jan
    Korpas, David
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE IN TELECOMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AND OPTICS 2010 (KTTO 2010), 2010, : 176 - 179
  • [10] Electromagnetic Compatibility Issues between Vehicular Mounted Antennas and Implantable Medical Devices
    Wang, Minshen
    Shen, Jianxiang
    Chen, Ji
    Kainz, Wolfgang
    Mendoza, Gonzalo
    Bit-Babik, Giorgi
    [J]. 2010 ASIA-PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY & TECHNICAL EXHIBITION ON EMC RF/MICROWAVE MEASUREMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION, 2010, : 170 - 172