Quantitative cartilage imaging of the human hind foot: precision and inter-subject variability

被引:43
|
作者
Al-Ali, D
Graichen, H
Faber, S
Englmeier, KH
Reiser, M
Eckstein, F
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Inst Anat, Musculoskeletal Res Grp, D-80336 Munich, Germany
[2] Orthopad Univ Klin, Res Grp Kinemat & Biomech, Frankfurt, Germany
[3] Univ Munich Klinikum, Inst Clin Radiol, Grosshadern, Germany
[4] GSF Natl Res Ctr Neuherberg, MEDIS Inst, Oberschleissheim, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00098-5
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Alterations of ankle cartilage are observed in degenerative and inflammatory joint disease, but cartilage cannot be directly visualized by radiography. The purpose of this study was therefore to analyze the feasibility and precision of quantitative cartilage imaging in the human hind foot (talocrural, talotarsal, and intertarsal joints), and to report the inter-subject variability for cartilage volume, thickness and surface areas. The feet of 16 healthy volunteers were imaged using a 3D gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging sequence with water-excitation. After interpolation to a resolution of 1 x 0.125 x 0.125 mm(3) the cartilage plates were segmented, and the cartilage volume, thickness, and surface areas determined. The precision (four repeated measurements) was examined in eight volunteers, the RMS average CV% being 2.1% to 10.9% in single joint surfaces, and less than or equal to3% for the cumulative values of all joints. The mean cartilage thickness ranged from 0.57 +/- 0.08 (navicular surface) to 0.89 +/- 0.19 mm (trochlear surface for tibia). In conclusion this study shows that it is feasible to quantify thin cartilage layers in the hind foot under in vivo imaging conditions, and that the precision errors are substantially smaller than the inter-subject variability in healthy subjects. (C) 2002 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 256
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Removing inter-subject technical variability in magnetic resonance imaging studies
    Fortin, Jean-Philippe
    Sweeney, Elizabeth M.
    Muschelli, John
    Crainiceanu, Ciprian M.
    Shinohara, Russell T.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2016, 132 : 198 - 212
  • [2] Influence of Noise Correction on Intra- and Inter-Subject Variability of Quantitative Metrics in Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging
    Andre, Elodie D.
    Grinberg, Farida
    Farrher, Ezequiel
    Maximov, Ivan I.
    Shah, N. Jon
    Meyer, Christelle
    Jaspar, Mathieu
    Muto, Vincenzo
    Phillips, Christophe
    Balteau, Evelyne
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (04):
  • [3] Inter-subject differences in the control of movement variability
    Krueger, Melanie
    Eggert, Thomas
    Straube, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 33 : S85 - S86
  • [4] Inter-subject variability in intestinal drug solubility
    Rabble, Sarit Cohen
    Flanagan, Talia
    Martin, Paul D.
    Bask, Abdul W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2015, 485 (1-2) : 229 - 234
  • [5] Prediction of Human Inhibition Brain Function with Inter-Subject and Intra-Subject Variability
    Chikara, Rupesh Kumar
    Ko, Li-Wei
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (10) : 1 - 21
  • [6] Quantitative analysis of the intra- and inter-subject variability of the whole salivary proteome
    Jehmlich, N.
    Dinh, K. H. D.
    Gesell-Salazar, M.
    Hammer, E.
    Steil, L.
    Dhople, V. M.
    Schurmann, C.
    Holtfreter, B.
    Kocher, T.
    Voelker, U.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 2013, 48 (03) : 392 - 403
  • [7] Inter-layer and inter-subject variability of diurnal gene expression in human skin
    del Olmo, Marta
    Spoerl, Florian
    Korge, Sandra
    Juerchott, Karsten
    Felten, Matthias
    Grudziecki, Astrid
    de Zeeuw, Jan
    Nowozin, Claudia
    Reuter, Hendrik
    Blatt, Thomas
    Herzel, Hanspeter
    Kunz, Dieter
    Kramer, Achim
    Ananthasubramaniam, Bharath
    NAR GENOMICS AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2022, 4 (04)
  • [8] Multivariate models of inter-subject anatomical variability
    Ashburner, John
    Kloeppel, Stefan
    NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 56 (02) : 422 - 439
  • [9] Apparent mass of the human body in the vertical direction: Inter-subject variability
    Toward, Martin G. R.
    Griffin, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2011, 330 (04) : 827 - 841
  • [10] Inter-subject comparison of MRI knee cartilage thickness
    Carballido-Gamio, Julio
    Bauer, Jan S.
    Stahl, Robert
    Lee, Keh-Yang
    Krause, Stefanie
    Link, Thomas M.
    Majumdar, Sharmila
    MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2008, 12 (02) : 120 - 135