Synergy in Ant Foraging Strategies: Memory and Communication Alone and In Combination

被引:0
|
作者
Letendre, Kenneth [1 ]
Moses, Melanie E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Dept Comp Sci, Dept Mol Genet & Microbiol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[2] Univ New Mexico, Dept Comp Sci, Dept Biol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
Ant colony; collective foraging; genetic algorithms; private information; social information; AGENT-BASED MODEL; HARVESTER ANTS; DECISION-MAKING; SITE SELECTION; OPTIMIZATION; INFORMATION; MOVEMENT; FIDELITY; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Collective foraging is a canonical problem in the study of social insect behavior, as well as in biologically inspired engineered systems. Pheromone recruitment is a well-studied mechanism by which ants coordinate their foraging. Another mechanism for information use is the memory of individual ants, which allows an ant to return to a site it has previously visited. There is synergy in the use of social and private information: ants with poor private information can follow pheromone trails; while ants with private information can ignore trails and instead rely on memory. We developed an agent-based model of foraging by harvester ants, and optimized the model to maximize foraging rate using genetic algorithms. We found that ants' individual memory provided greater benefit in terms of increased foraging rate than pheromone trails in a variety of food distributions. When the two strategies are used together, they out-perform either strategy alone. We compare the behavior of these models to observations of harvester ants in the field. We discuss why individual memory is more beneficial in this system than pheromone trails. We suggest that individual memory may be an important addition to ant colony optimization and swarm robotics systems, and that genetic algorithms may be useful in finding an adaptive balance between individual foraging based on memory and recruitment based on communication.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 48
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Insect communication - 'No entry' signal in ant foraging
    Robinson, EJH
    Jackson, DE
    Holcombe, M
    Ratnieks, FLW
    [J]. NATURE, 2005, 438 (7067) : 442 - 442
  • [2] Foraging patterns and strategies in an Australian desert ant
    Schultheiss, Patrick
    Nooten, Sabine S.
    [J]. AUSTRAL ECOLOGY, 2013, 38 (08) : 942 - 951
  • [3] Together or alone? Foraging strategies in Caenorhabditis elegans
    Boender, Arjen J.
    Roubos, Eric W.
    van der Velde, Gerard
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2011, 86 (04) : 853 - 862
  • [4] Foraging strategies of the ant Ectatomma vizottoi (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)
    Lima, Luan D.
    Antonialli-Junior, William F.
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENTOMOLOGIA, 2013, 57 (04) : 392 - 396
  • [5] MEMORY DYNAMICS AND FORAGING STRATEGIES OF HONEYBEES
    GREGGERS, U
    MENZEL, R
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1993, 32 (01) : 17 - 29
  • [6] Ant colony system with communication strategies
    Chu, SC
    Roddick, JF
    Pan, JS
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2004, 167 (1-4) : 63 - 76
  • [7] Synergy in Spreading Processes: From Exploitative to Explorative Foraging Strategies
    Perez-Reche, Francisco J.
    Ludlam, Jonathan J.
    Taraskin, Sergei N.
    Gilligan, Christopher A.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2011, 106 (21)
  • [8] ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF DESACETYLCEFOTAXIME ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH CEFOTAXIME - EVIDENCE OF SYNERGY
    JONES, RN
    BARRY, AL
    THORNSBERRY, C
    [J]. REVIEWS OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1982, 4 : S366 - S373
  • [9] Ant social foraging strategies along a Neotropical gradient of urbanization
    Wesley Dáttilo
    Ian MacGregor-Fors
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 11
  • [10] Ant foraging strategies vary along a natural resource gradient
    Segev, Udi
    Tielboerger, Katja
    Lubin, Yael
    Kigel, Jaime
    [J]. OIKOS, 2021, 130 (01) : 66 - 78