General practitioners' use of sickness certificates

被引:31
|
作者
Roope, Richard [1 ]
Parker, Gordon [2 ]
Turner, Susan [3 ]
机构
[1] Whiteley Surg, Whiteley PO15 7LB, Fareham, England
[2] Royal Preston Hosp, Lancashire Teaching Hosp, Natl Hlth Serv Fdn Trust, Preston PR2 9HT, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Occupat & Environm Res Grp, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
来源
OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD | 2009年 / 59卷 / 08期
关键词
Cost of sickness; general practice; occupational medicine; sickness absence duration; sickness certification; UNITED-KINGDOM; WORK; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1093/occmed/kqp147
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background At present, sickness certification is largely undertaken by general practitioners (GPs). Guidance from the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) is available to help with this task; however, there has been little formal evaluation of the DWP's guidance in relation to day-to-day general practice. Aims To assess GPs' training, knowledge and application of the DWP's sickness certification guidelines. Methods A structured questionnaire was sent to GPs within a (former) primary care trust (PCT). It probed demographics, training and knowledge of sickness certification guidelines. Case histories and structured questions were used to assess current practice. Results In this group of 113 GPs, there was a low awareness and use of the DWP's guidelines and Website relating to sickness certification. The majority of the GPs (63%) had received no training in sickness certification, and the mean length of time for those who had received training was 4.1 h. Most GPs also felt that patients and GPs have equal influence on the duration of sickness certification. Conclusions This evidence of variable practice indicates that GPs should have more guidance and education in sickness certification. Closer sickness certification monitoring through existing GP computer systems may facilitate an improvement in practice that benefits patients and employers. The DWP, medical educators and PCTs may all have an additional role in further improving sickness certification practice.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / 585
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] "A powerful intervention: general practitioners'; use of sickness certification in depression"
    Sara Macdonald
    Margaret Maxwell
    Philip Wilson
    Michael Smith
    Will Whittaker
    Matt Sutton
    Jill Morrison
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 13
  • [2] A powerful intervention: general practitioners' use of sickness certification in depression
    Macdonald, Sara
    Maxwell, Margaret
    Wilson, Philip
    Smith, Michael
    Whittaker, Will
    Sutton, Matt
    Morrison, Jill
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2012, 13
  • [3] Unsanctioned techniques for having sickness certificates accepted: a qualitative exploration and description of the strategies used by Swedish general practitioners
    Shutzberg, Mani
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2019, 37 (01) : 10 - 17
  • [4] SICKNESS CERTIFICATION BY GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS
    HALL, GH
    HAMILTON, WT
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 307 (6908): : 870 - 871
  • [5] General practitioners' relationship to sickness certification
    Gulbrandsen, Pal
    Hofoss, Dag
    Nylenna, Magne
    Saltyte-Benth, Jurate
    Aasland, Olaf G.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2007, 25 (01) : 20 - 26
  • [6] SICKNESS CERTIFICATES
    THORPE, MO
    [J]. LANCET, 1969, 2 (7629): : 1070 - &
  • [7] General practitioners and sickness certification for injury in Australia
    Danielle Mazza
    Bianca Brijnath
    Nabita Singh
    Agnieszka Kosny
    Rasa Ruseckaite
    Alex Collie
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 16
  • [8] General practitioners and sickness certification for injury in Australia
    Mazza, Danielle
    Brijnath, Bianca
    Singh, Nabita
    Kosny, Agnieszka
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    Collie, Alex
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2015, 16
  • [9] Certificates by practitioners
    Howitt, HG
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1941, 1941 : 794 - 795
  • [10] Certificates by practitioners
    Curry, S
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1941, 1941 : 795 - 795