Is tumour size a predictor of survival in stage II cervical cancer: a comparison between the old and new FIGO staging criteria

被引:0
|
作者
Lim, Y. K. [1 ]
Lin, Linda [1 ]
Chia, Y. N. [1 ]
Yam, K. L. [1 ]
Khoo-Tan [2 ]
Yeo, R. [2 ]
Yap, S. P. [2 ]
Soh, L. T. [2 ]
Chua, E. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] KK Womens & Childrens Hosp, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Canc Ctr, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 168
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FIGO 2018 staging criteria for cervical cancer: Impact on stage migration and survival
    Grigsby, Perry W.
    Massad, Leslie S.
    Mutch, David G.
    Powell, Matthew A.
    Thaker, Premal H.
    McCourt, Carolyn
    Hagemann, Andrea
    Fuh, Katherine
    Kuroki, Lindsay
    Schwarz, Julie K.
    Markovina, Stephanie
    Lin, Alexander J.
    Dehdashti, Farrokh
    Siegel, Barry A.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 157 (03) : 639 - 643
  • [2] Survival outcomes and patterns of failure from stage migration of FIGO staging in cervical cancer
    Sittiwong, W.
    Dankulchai, P.
    Chareonsiriwat, N.
    Manopetchkasem, S.
    Prasartseree, T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S806 - S808
  • [3] Tumor size is of prognostic value in surgically treated FIGO stage II cervical cancer
    Horn, L. -C.
    Fischer, U.
    Raptis, G.
    Bilek, K.
    Hentschel, B.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 107 (02) : 310 - 315
  • [4] FIGO 2009 versus 2018 staging for cervical cancer: A comparative study on prediction of survival based on stage
    Washington, Christina Renay
    Zhao, Daniel
    Moore, Kathleen N.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 159 (02) : E37 - E37
  • [5] FIGO 2009 versus 2018 staging for cervical cancer: A comparative study on prediction of survival based on stage
    Washington, C. R.
    Zhao, D.
    Moore, K. N.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 159 : 174 - 174
  • [6] SIGNIFICANCE OF HISTOLOGY AND NODAL STATUS ON THE SURVIVAL OF WOMEN WITH EARLY-STAGE CERVICAL CANCER: VALIDATION OF THE 2018 FIGO CERVICAL CANCER STAGING SYSTEM
    Machida, H.
    Matsuo, K.
    Kobayashi, Y.
    Momomura, M.
    Takahashi, F.
    Tabata, T.
    Kondo, E.
    Yamagami, W.
    Ebina, Y.
    Kaneuchi, M.
    Nagase, S.
    Mikami, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 : A42 - A42
  • [7] Significance of histology and nodal status on the survival of women with early-stage cervical cancer: validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system
    Machida, Hiroko
    Matsuo, Koji
    Kobayashi, Yoichi
    Momomura, Mai
    Takahashi, Fumiaki
    Tabata, Tsutomu
    Kondo, Eiji
    Yamagami, Wataru
    Ebina, Yasuhiko
    Kaneuchi, Masanori
    Nagase, Satoru
    Mikami, Mikio
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 (03)
  • [8] THE DELETERIOUS SURVIVAL IMPACT OF POSITIVE LYMPH NODES IN CERVICAL CANCER: IMPLICATIONS OF THE NEW FIGO STAGING SYSTEM
    Torgeson, A.
    Gaffney, D.
    McComas, K.
    Maurer, K.
    Burt, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 : A95 - A95
  • [9] Stage IIA1 Versus Stage IIA2 Cervical Cancer Does the New Staging Criteria Predict Survival?
    Garg, Gunjal
    Shah, Jay P.
    Toy, Eugene P.
    Christensen, Carl
    Deppe, Gunter
    Asaad, Radwan
    Morris, Robert T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2011, 21 (04) : 711 - 716
  • [10] Prophylactic Extended Field Radiotherapy Can Improve The Survival of Stage IIIB Cervical Cancer According to The Updated FIGO Staging
    Meng, Q.
    Zhang, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E332 - E332