Behavioral health insurance parity for Federal Employees

被引:141
|
作者
Goldman, HH
Frank, RG
Burnam, MA
Huskamp, HA
Ridgely, MS
Normand, SLT
Young, AS
Barry, CL
Azzone, V
Busch, AB
Azrin, ST
Moran, G
Lichtenstein, C
Blasinsky, M
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21227 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA USA
[5] Dept Vet Affairs, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[7] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[8] McLean Hosp, Belmont, MA 02178 USA
[9] Westat Corp, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
[10] Northrop Grumman Informat Technol, Fed Enterprise Solut, Hlth Solut, Rockville, MD USA
[11] CSR, Arlington, VA USA
来源
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 2006年 / 354卷 / 13期
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMsa053737
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: To improve insurance coverage of mental health and substance-abuse services, the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program offered mental health and substance-abuse benefits on a par with general medical benefits beginning in January 2001. The plans were encouraged to manage care. METHODS: We compared seven FEHB plans from 1999 through 2002 with a matched set of health plans that did not have benefits on a par with mental health and substance-abuse benefits (parity of mental health and substance-abuse benefits). Using a difference-in-differences analysis, we compared the claims patterns of matched pairs of FEHB and control plans by examining the rate of use, total spending, and out-of-pocket spending among users of mental health and substance-abuse services. RESULTS: The difference-in-differences analysis indicated that the observed increase in the rate of use of mental health and substance-abuse services after the implementation of the parity policy was due almost entirely to a general trend in increased use that was observed in comparison health plans as well as FEHB plans. The implementation of parity was associated with a statistically significant increase in use in one plan (+0.78 percent, P<0.05) a significant decrease in use in one plan (-0.96 percent, P<0.05), and no significant difference in use in the other five plans (range, -0.38 percent to +0.23 percent; P>0.05 for each comparison). For beneficiaries who used mental health and substance-abuse services, spending attributable to the implementation of parity decreased significantly for three plans (range, -$201.99 to -$68.97; P<0.05 for each comparison) and did not change significantly for four plans (range, -$42.13 to +$27.11; P>0.05 for each comparison). The implementation of parity was associated with significant reductions in out-of-pocket spending in five of seven plans. CONCLUSIONS: When coupled with management of care, implementation of parity in insurance benefits for behavioral health care can improve insurance protection without increasing total costs.
引用
收藏
页码:1378 / 1386
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Health plans respond to parity: Managing behavioral health care in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program
    Ridgely, MS
    Burnam, MA
    Barry, CL
    Goldman, HH
    Hennessy, KD
    [J]. MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2006, 84 (01): : 201 - 218
  • [2] Mental health and substance abuse insurance parity for federal employees: How did health plans respond?
    Barry, Colleen L.
    Ridgely, M. Susan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 27 (01) : 155 - 170
  • [3] Considering health insurance parity for mental health and substance abuse treatment: The Federal Employees Health Benefits experience
    Goldman, Howard H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 164 (10): : 1473 - 1474
  • [4] HEALTH-INSURANCE FOR FEDERAL-EMPLOYEES
    JOHANSON, JM
    [J]. NEW REPUBLIC, 1979, 180 (10) : 3 - 3
  • [5] A Political History of Federal Mental Health and Addiction Insurance Parity
    Barry, Colleen L.
    Huskamp, Haiden A.
    Goldman, Howard H.
    [J]. MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2010, 88 (03): : 404 - 433
  • [6] Federal Parity and Access to Behavioral Health Care in Private Health Plans
    Hodgkin, Dominic
    Horgan, Constance M.
    Stewart, Maureen T.
    Quinn, Amity E.
    Creedon, Timothy B.
    Reif, Sharon
    Garnick, Deborah W.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2018, 69 (04) : 396 - 402
  • [7] Insurance: Patient protections for federal employees
    Pang, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2000, 28 (04): : 417 - 418
  • [8] Increasing health insurance coverage through an extended federal employees health benefits program
    Fuchs, BC
    [J]. INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING, 2001, 38 (02) : 177 - 192
  • [9] The impact of parity on major depression treatment quality in the federal employees' health benefits program after parity implementation
    Busch, AB
    Huskamp, HA
    Normand, SLT
    Young, AS
    Goldman, H
    Frank, RG
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2006, 44 (06) : 506 - 512
  • [10] Effect Of Population Size On Rural Health Insurance Premiums In The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program
    Barker, Abigail R.
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2019, 38 (12) : 2041 - 2047