Pharmaceutical grey water footprint: Accounting, influence of wastewater treatment plants and implications of the reuse

被引:67
|
作者
Martinez-Alcala, Isabel [1 ]
Pellicer-Martinez, Francisco [1 ]
Fernandez-Lopez, Carmen [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Murcia, UCAM, Campus Jeronimos,135 Guadalupe, Murcia 30107, Spain
关键词
Grey water footprint; Pharmaceuticals; Irrigation; Water resources management; Wastewater treatment plant; Murcia region; EMERGING CONTAMINANTS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; RIVER-BASIN; REMOVAL; SPAIN; MICROPOLLUTANTS; DEGRADATION; POLLUTANTS; PRODUCTS; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2018.02.033
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Emerging pollutants, including pharmaceutical compounds, are producing water pollution problems around the world. Some pharmaceutical pollutants, which mainly reach ecosystems within wastewater discharges, are persistent in the water cycle and can also reach the food chain. This work addresses this issue, accounting the grey component of the water footprint (GWF(P)) for four of the most common pharmaceutical compounds (carbamazepine (CBZ), diclofenac (DCF), ketoprofen (KTP) and naproxen (NPX)). In addition, the GWF(C) for the main conventional pollutants is also accounted (nitrate, phosphates and organic matter). The case study is the Murcia Region of southeastern Spain, where wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) purify 99.1% of the wastewater discharges and there is an important direct reuse of the treated wastewater in irrigation. Thus, the influence of WWTPs and reuse on the GWF is analysed. The results reveal that GWF B only taking into account pharmaceutical pollutants, has a value of 301 m(3) inhabitant(-1) year(-1) considering only conventional pollutants (GWF(C)), this value increases to 4718 m(3) inhabitant(-1) year(-1) . So, the difference between these values is such that in other areas with consumption habits similar to those of the Murcia Region, and without wastewater purification, conventional pollutants may well establish the value of the GWF. On average, the WWTPs reduce the GWF(C) by 90% and the GWF(P) by 26%. These different reductions of the pollutant concentrations in the treated effluents show that the GWF is not only due to conventional pollutants, and other contaminants can became critical, such as the pharmaceutical pollutants. The reuse further reduces the value of the GWF for the Murcia Region, by around 43.6%. However, the reuse of treated wastewater is controversial, considering the pharmaceutical contaminants and their possible consequences in the food chain. In these cases, the GWF of pharmaceutical pollutants can be used to provide a first approximation of the dilution that should be applied to the treated wastewater discharges when they are reused for another economic activity that imposes quality restrictions. For the case of agriculture in the Murcia Region, the dilution required is 2 (fresh water) to 1 (treated wastewater), taking into account the pollution thresholds established in this work. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 287
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Water footprint assessment in wastewater treatment plants
    Morera, S.
    Corominas, L. I.
    Poch, M.
    Aldaya, M. M.
    Comas, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 4741 - 4748
  • [2] Grey water footprint assessment for a dye industry wastewater treatment plant using Monte Carlo simulation: influence of reuse on minimisation of the GWF
    Yapicioglu, Pelin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2020, 21 (02) : 199 - 213
  • [3] An approach to develop grey water footprint accounting
    Jamshidi, Shervin
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 106
  • [4] Pharmaceutical Industry Wastewater: Review of the Technologies for Water Treatment and Reuse
    Gadipelly, Chandrakanth
    Perez-Gonzalez, Antia
    Yadav, Ganapati D.
    Ortiz, Inmaculada
    Ibanez, Raquel
    Rathod, Virendra K.
    Marathe, Kumudini V.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2014, 53 (29) : 11571 - 11592
  • [5] Location Planning of Wastewater Treatment Plants for Reuse of Treated Water
    Oniki, Satoru
    Tsuchiya, Satoshi
    Tanimoto, Keishi
    Hosoi, Yoshihiko
    [J]. 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2018, : 457 - 461
  • [6] Improving grey water footprint assessment: Accounting for uncertainty
    De Girolamo, Anna Maria
    Miscioscia, Pierluigi
    Politi, Tiziano
    Barca, Emanuele
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 102 : 822 - 833
  • [7] Grey water footprint of a dairy industry wastewater treatment plant: a comparative study
    Yapicioglu, Pelin Soyertas
    [J]. WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 14 (01) : 137 - 144
  • [8] Grey water footprint for evaluating Zefta wastewater treatment plant: a case study
    Ahmed, Sayed I.
    Moustafa, Mohamed H.
    Metwaly, Tarek S.
    Shata, Hamdy M.
    Elmesery, Yasmin E.
    El-dahy, Said
    Sirry, Ahmed A.
    Al Azab, Mohamad A.
    Samhan, Farag A.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 45 (28) : 6277 - 6286
  • [9] A holistic approach for performance evaluation of wastewater treatment plants: integrating grey water footprint and life cycle impact assessment
    Jamshidi, Shervin
    Farsimadan, Mohammad
    Mohammadi, Hanieh
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 89 (07) : 1741 - 1756
  • [10] Evaluation of the impact of water reclamation on blue and grey water footprint in a municipal wastewater treatment plant
    Cankaya, Simge
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 903