THE VALUE OF DEMAND RESPONSE (DR) TO MITIGATE WIND INTEGRATION COSTS IN A SMART GRID

被引:0
|
作者
Kumar, Nikhil [1 ]
Lefton, Steven A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Intertek APTECH, Sunnyvale, CA USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In the last five years the electric grid worldwide has seen increasing amounts of installed wind generation capacity. Over the last five years, North America (USA and Canada) has witnessed wind capacity grow at an annual rate of over 30%. At the same time, increasing investments in smart grid technologies have enabled improvements in energy products such as Demand Response (DR). The utility industry, system operators and regulators are investing heavily to understand and determine the impacts of increasing wind penetration on the power system. As explored below, an often neglected, but important point of interest to the authors has been the effect of increased cycling of large fossil, formerly base loaded power plants due to increasing penetration of variable wind or solar power. Various types of DR programs have been implemented by utilities and system operators and these DR programs may be classified based on the time it takes to call upon a DR event or the energy market that the programs are allowed to participate within. Hence, we may have a "slow" DR that participates in a Day-Ahead market and the events are called upon well in advance. On the other hand, "fast" DR programs would participate in Real-Time and Ancillary Services markets. DR from a power dispatch perspective can be considered a "virtual power plant" providing energy, ancillary service and capacity in energy markets. Energy benefits of DR have been explored extensively, especially in terms of reduced fuel costs due to reduction in demand. In this paper we explore the conceptual use and value of DR in providing benefits associated with reduced damage to a fleet of fossil-fueled power plants if it is used to reduce startups and/or load following/cycling.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 505
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Value of Demand Response in the Smart Grid
    Zhu, Quanyan
    Sauer, Peter
    Basar, Tamer
    2013 IEEE POWER AND ENERGY CONFERENCE AT ILLINOIS (PECI), 2013, : 76 - 82
  • [2] Modeling framework and validation of a smart grid and demand response system for wind power integration
    Broeer, Torsten
    Fuller, Jason
    Tuffner, Francis
    Chassin, David
    Djilali, Ned
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 113 : 199 - 207
  • [3] Smart Grid Demand Side Response Model to Mitigate Peak Demands on Electrical Networks
    Marwan Marwan
    Fouad Kamel
    Journal of Electronic Science and Technology, 2011, 9 (02) : 136 - 144
  • [4] Cyber and Physical Integration Analysis for Automated Residential Demand Response in Smart Grid
    Jia, Kunqi
    He, Guangyu
    Fan, Shuai
    Lin, Guoying
    Lu, Shixiang
    Pan, Feng
    2017 IEEE PES ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APPEEC), 2017,
  • [5] Demand Response for Renewable Energy Integration and Load Balancing in Smart Grid Communities
    Chis, Adriana
    Rajasekharan, Jayaprakash
    Lunden, Jarmo
    Koivunen, Visa
    2016 24TH EUROPEAN SIGNAL PROCESSING CONFERENCE (EUSIPCO), 2016, : 1423 - 1427
  • [6] Smart Dispatch for Grid Integration of Wind Generation
    Cheung, Kwok W.
    2011 2ND IEEE PES INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION ON INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES (ISGT EUROPE), 2011,
  • [7] Pareto Optimal Demand Response Based on Energy Costs and Load Factor in Smart Grid
    Chiu, Wei-Yu
    Hsieh, Jui-Ting
    Chen, Chia-Ming
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, 2020, 16 (03) : 1811 - 1822
  • [8] From Demand Response in Smart Grid Toward Integrated Demand Response in Smart Energy Hub
    Bahrami, Shahab
    Sheikhi, Aras
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2016, 7 (02) : 650 - 658
  • [9] A review of residential demand response of smart grid
    Haider, Haider Tarish
    See, Ong Hang
    Elmenreich, Wilfried
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 59 : 166 - 178
  • [10] Smart grid: Implementing automated demand response
    1600, American Institute of Chemical Engineers (110):