Assessing the EU ETS with a bottom-up, multi-sector model

被引:4
|
作者
Pintos, Pablo [1 ]
Linares, Pedro
机构
[1] Univ Pontificia Comillas, Inst Invest Tecnol, Alberto Aguilera 23, Madrid 28015, Spain
关键词
abatement costs; company behaviour; emissions pricing; EU Emissions Trading Scheme; industrial emissions; Q31; Q37; Q48; Q56; Q58; COMPUTATIONAL GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM; LOAD LEVEL DETAIL; STEEL; COSTS;
D O I
10.1080/14693062.2017.1294045
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The European Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) is the central pillar of the EU response against climate change. This trading mechanism is considered, from the theoretical point of view, as the most cost-effective method to reduce GHG. However, previous studies show that the agents who participate in these markets may behave in a way that may lead to inefficient CO2 prices, creating doubts about the static and dynamic efficiency of the system. This article analyses these possible anomalies by first trying to model the ETS in a more realistic way, addressing some of the limitations of previous models, and second, by comparing the results with real market transactions. For this, a bottom-up, multi-sector model has been built, which represents the EU ETS in an integrated, cross-sectoral way, paying particular attention to the interactions among the most emissions intensive industries. The results show the benefits of this modelling approach and how it better reflects real market conditions. Some preliminary conclusions regarding the behaviour of the agents in the ETS market are also presented.POLICY RELEVANCELow allowance prices in the EU ETS have put into question the dynamic efficiency of the EU ETS system, prompting various ideas for structural reform. However, determining the right reform also requires estimating correctly how agents will respond to it. This article proposes a tool to realistically simulate the EU ETS under the assumption of rational agents, and compare it to real market outcomes, in order to understand better the behaviour of agents in this carbon market, and therefore how to design better policies.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 424
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IMPLEMENTING A 'BOTTOM-UP,'MULTI-SECTOR RESEARCH COLLABORATION: THE CASE OF THE TEXAS AIR QUALITY STUDY
    Boardman, Craig
    Bozeman, Barry
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 15 (01) : 51 - 69
  • [2] A multi-sector inventory model
    Allen, DS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1997, 32 (01) : 55 - 87
  • [3] A bottom-up model analysis of transport sector: a study of China and USA
    Zhang, Hongjun
    Yin, Xiang
    Chen, Wenying
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY, ICAE2014, 2014, 61 : 895 - 898
  • [4] Discourses and bottom-up policymaking in Europe and the EU
    Bandelow, Nils C.
    Hornung, Johanna
    Sager, Fritz
    Schroeder, Ilana
    [J]. EUROPEAN POLICY ANALYSIS, 2024, 10 (02) : 158 - 161
  • [5] A Multi-sector Model of the Australian Economy
    Rees, Daniel M.
    Smith, Penelope
    Hall, Jamie
    [J]. ECONOMIC RECORD, 2016, 92 (298) : 374 - 408
  • [6] A MULTI-SECTOR MODEL OF BALANCED GROWTH
    BEAR, DVT
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1961, 43 (02) : 156 - 162
  • [7] Critically Assessing Estimated DSGE Models: A Case Study of a Multi-sector Model
    Liu, Xianglong
    Pagan, Adrian R.
    Robinson, Tim
    [J]. ECONOMIC RECORD, 2018, 94 (307) : 349 - 371
  • [8] A methodology for bottom-up modelling of energy transitions in the industry sector: The FORECAST model
    Fleiter, Tobias
    Rehfeldt, Matthias
    Herbst, Andrea
    Elsland, Rainer
    Klingler, Anna-Lena
    Manz, Pia
    Eidelloth, Stefan
    [J]. ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2018, 22 : 237 - 254
  • [9] A Multi-sector Model of Public Expenditure and Growth
    Zhang, Lifeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2015, 115 (01) : 73 - 93
  • [10] Representing power sector detail and flexibility in a multi-sector model
    Wise, Marshall
    Patel, Pralit
    Khan, Zarrar
    Kim, Son H.
    Hejazi, Mohamad
    Iyer, Gokul
    [J]. ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2019, 26