A comparative study of interpolation methods for mapping soil properties

被引:197
|
作者
Kravchenko, A [1 ]
Bullock, DG [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Crop Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj1999.00021962009100030007x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The choice of an optimal interpolation technique for estimating soil properties at unsampled locations is an important issue in site-specific management. The objective of this study was to evaluate inverse distance (InvD) weighting, ordinary kriging (KO), and lognormal ordinary kriging (KOlog) to determine the optimal interpolation method for mapping soil properties, Relationships between statistical properties of the data and performance of the methods were analyzed using soil test P and K data from 30 agricultural fields. For InvD weighting, we used powers of 1, 2, 3, and 4, The numbers of the closest neighboring points ranged from 5 to 30 for the three methods. The results suggest that KOlog can improve estimation precision compared with KO for lognormally distributed data. The criteria helpful in deciding whether KOlog is applicable for the given data set were the Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit statistic, coefficient of variation, skewness, kurtosis, and the size of the data set, Careful choice of the exponent value for InvD weighting and of the number of the closest neighbors for both InvD weighting and kriging (KO or KOlog) significantly improved the estimation accuracy (P less than or equal to 0.05), However, no a priori decision could be made about the optimal exponent and the number of the closest neighbors based on the statistical properties of the data. For the majority of the data sets, kriging with the optimal number of the neighboring points, a carefully selected variogram model, and appropriate log-transformation of the data performed better than InvD weighting. Correlation coefficients between experimental data and estimated results of kriging were higher than those of InvD for 57 out of a total of 60 data sets, kriging mean absolute errors were lower for 44 data sets, and kriging mean errors were lower than those of InvD weighting for 31 data sets.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 400
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mapping the Spatial Variability of Soil Properties: A Comparative Study of Spatial Interpolation Methods in Northeast China
    Li, Xiaoyan
    Li, Hong
    Liu, Huijia
    [J]. ENERGY ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENT ENGINEERING, 2014, 535 : 483 - 488
  • [2] The differences in the interpolation methods for mapping spatial variability of soil properties
    Brodsky, L
    Vanek, V
    Bazalová, M
    Balík, J
    [J]. ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 2001, 47 (12): : 529 - 535
  • [3] A comparative study of terrain interpolation methods
    Ahmadzadeh, MR
    Duree, P
    Petrou, M
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR EARTH SCIENCE, OCEAN, AND SEA ICE APPLICATIONS, 1999, 3868 : 356 - 365
  • [4] Comparison of interpolation methods for mapping soil P and K contents
    Kravchenko, AN
    Bullock, DG
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRECISION AGRICULTURE, PTS A AND B, 1999, : 267 - 279
  • [5] Mapping soil gas radon concentration: A comparative study of geostatistical methods
    Buttafuoco, Gabriele
    Tallarico, Adalisa
    Falcone, Giovanni
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2007, 131 (1-3) : 135 - 151
  • [6] Mapping Soil Gas Radon Concentration: A Comparative Study of Geostatistical Methods
    Gabriele Buttafuoco
    Adalisa Tallarico
    Giovanni Falcone
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2007, 131 : 135 - 151
  • [7] Mapping Soil Properties at a Regional Scale: Assessing Deterministic vs. Geostatistical Interpolation Methods at Different Soil Depths
    Barrena-Gonzalez, Jesus
    Lavado Contador, Joaquin Francisco
    Pulido Fernandez, Manuel
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [8] Nonparametric spectrum interpolation methods: A comparative study
    Zivanovic, M
    Carlosena, A
    [J]. IMTC/2000: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH IEEE INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE: SMART CONNECTIVITY: INTEGRATING MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL, 2000, : 618 - 623
  • [9] Nonparametric spectrum interpolation methods: A comparative study
    Zivanovic, M
    Carlosena, A
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2001, 50 (05) : 1127 - 1132
  • [10] Testing the performance of spatial interpolation techniques for mapping soil properties
    Robinson, TP
    Metternicht, G
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2006, 50 (02) : 97 - 108