FREE FIBULAR FLAP WITH PERIOSTEAL EXCESS FOR MANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION

被引:30
|
作者
Trignano, Emilio [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fallico, Nefer [2 ]
Faenza, Mario [3 ]
Rubino, Corrado [3 ]
Chen, Hung-Chi [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Taichung 40447, Taiwan
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Sassari, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
关键词
FREE BONE TRANSFER; OSTEOSEPTOCUTANEOUS FLAP; OROMANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION; ILIAC CREST; NECK; HEAD; RESTORATION; CIRCULATION; THICKNESS; ANTERIOR;
D O I
10.1002/micr.22159
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundIn microvascular transfer of fibular osteocutaneous flap for mandible reconstruction after cancer ablation, good bone union is necessary to allow timely radiation therapy after surgery. As the area of bone contact between fibula and the original mandible at the edge of the mandibular defect is small, a periosteal excess at both ends of the fibula covering the bone junction can be used to increase the chance of bone union. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether a periosteal excess surrounding both ends of the fibula flap can provide better blood supply and, therefore, ensure bone union and wound healing at 6 weeks after surgery and before radiation therapy initiation. Patients and methodsThe transfer of fibular osteocutaneous flap with periosteal excess was only applied to reconstruct segmental mandibular defects. As a consequence, only cases in which osteotomy of fibula was not performed were included in this study. A total of 34 fibular flaps without osteotomies were performed between 2000 and 2008; 17 with and 17 without the periosteal excess. The bone union was evaluated in terms of osseous callus formation using X-rays and CT three-dimensional images at 6 weeks after surgery, and results were assessed by three independent radiologists. ResultsThere was a significant difference between reconstructions with and without the periosteal excess in terms of bone union (P=0.022). With reference to postoperative complications, the group reconstructed without periosteal excess presented a higher number of complications, mainly consisting of partial and total flap necrosis, respectively six (35.29%) and two (11.76%) cases. In the group reconstructed with periosteal excess, no loss of the skin island has occurred. A significant difference was observed in terms of partial flap necrosis (P=0.024), while the other complications did not reveal a statistically significant difference (P>0.05). ConclusionsThe use of a periosteal excess at both ends of the fibula flap provides better blood supply and is, therefore, able to ensure good bone healing and skin paddle survival regardless of the radiotherapy. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 33:527-533, 2013.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 533
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Free fibular flap reconstruction in mandibular osteopetrosis
    Eppley, BL
    Coleman, JJ
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 12 (04) : 369 - 372
  • [2] MANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH FREE VASCULARIZED FIBULAR FLAP
    LEE, JH
    KIM, MJ
    KIM, JW
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLO-FACIAL SURGERY, 1995, 23 (01): : 20 - 26
  • [3] Fibular Free Flap and Iliac Crest Free Flap Mandibular Reconstruction In Patients With Mandibular Ameloblastomas
    Piotrowska-Seweryn, Agnieszka
    Szymczyk, Cezary
    Walczak, Dominik A.
    Krakowczyk, Lukasz
    Maciejewski, Adam
    Hadasik, Grzegorz
    Wierzgon, Janusz
    Szumniak, Ryszard
    Drozdowski, Piotr
    Paul, Piotr
    Grajek, Maciej
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 33 (07) : 1962 - 1970
  • [4] The use of free fibular flap for functional mandibular reconstruction
    Peled, M
    El-Naaj, IA
    Lipin, Y
    Ardekian, L
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 63 (02) : 220 - 224
  • [5] Evaluation of mandibular reconstruction with free vascularized fibular flap
    Krishna Gopal Bhuju
    The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2008, (01) : 23 - 27
  • [6] Fibular free flap reconstruction of the ''true'' lateral mandibular defect
    Anthony, JP
    Foster, RD
    Kaplan, MJ
    Singer, MI
    Pogrel, MA
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1997, 38 (02) : 137 - 146
  • [7] Risk factors assessment in fibular free flap mandibular reconstruction
    Bouland, C.
    Albert, N.
    Boutremans, E.
    Rodriguez, A.
    Loeb, I
    Dequanter, D.
    Javadian, R.
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE PLASTIQUE ESTHETIQUE, 2021, 66 (05): : 351 - 356
  • [8] Reconstruction with fibular osteocutaneous free flap in patients with mandibular osteoradionecrosis
    Kim M.G.
    Lee S.T.
    Park J.Y.
    Choi S.W.
    Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 37 (1)
  • [9] THE VASCULARIZED FIBULAR FLAP FOR MANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION
    LYBERG, T
    OLSTAD, OA
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1991, 19 (03): : 113 - 118
  • [10] MINI PADDLE FOR MONITORING THE FIBULAR FREE-FLAP IN MANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION
    ALQATTAN, MM
    BOYD, JB
    MICROSURGERY, 1994, 15 (02) : 153 - 154