An urn model for majority voting in classification ensembles

被引:0
|
作者
Soto, Victor [1 ]
Suarez, Alberto [2 ]
Martinez-Munoz, Gonzalo [2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Comp Sci Dept, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Comp Sci Dept, Madrid, Spain
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this work we analyze the class prediction of parallel randomized ensembles by majority voting as an urn model. For a given test instance, the ensemble can be viewed as an urn of marbles of different colors. A marble represents an individual classifier. Its color represents the class label prediction of the corresponding classifier. The sequential querying of classifiers in the ensemble can be seen as draws without replacement from the urn. An analysis of this classical urn model based on the hypergeometric distribution makes it possible to estimate the confidence on the outcome of majority voting when only a fraction of the individual predictions is known. These estimates can be used to speed up the prediction by the ensemble. Specifically, the aggregation of votes can be halted when the confidence in the final prediction is sufficiently high. If one assumes a uniform prior for the distribution of possible votes the analysis is shown to be equivalent to a previous one based on Dirichlet distributions. The advantage of the current approach is that prior knowledge on the possible vote outcomes can be readily incorporated in a Bayesian framework. We show how incorporating this type of problem-specific knowledge into the statistical analysis of majority voting leads to faster classification by the ensemble and allows us to estimate the expected average speed-up beforehand.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A New Model for Measuring the Accuracies of Majority Voting Ensembles
    Wang, Xueyi
    [J]. 2012 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN), 2012,
  • [2] Hybrid Majority Voting: Prediction and Classification Model for Obesity
    Solomon, Dahlak Daniel
    Khan, Shakir
    Garg, Sonia
    Gupta, Gaurav
    Almjally, Abrar
    Alabduallah, Bayan Ibrahimm
    Alsagri, Hatoon S.
    Ibrahim, Mandour Mohamed
    Abdallah, Alsadig Mohammed Adam
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (15)
  • [3] Voting ensembles for spoken affect classification
    Morrison, Donn
    De Silva, Liyanage C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NETWORK AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, 2007, 30 (04) : 1356 - 1365
  • [4] Beyond majority: Label ranking ensembles based on voting rules
    Werbin-Ofir, Havi
    Dery, Lihi
    Shmueli, Erez
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 136 : 50 - 61
  • [5] Urdu Text Classification using Majority Voting
    Usman, Muhammad
    Shafique, Zunaira
    Ayub, Saba
    Malik, Kamran
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2016, 7 (08) : 265 - 273
  • [6] A Weighted Majority Voting Ensemble Approach for Classification
    Dogan, Alican
    Birant, Derya
    [J]. 2019 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (UBMK), 2019, : 366 - 371
  • [7] Classification of transformed face images with majority voting
    Liu, Nan
    Wang, Han
    [J]. 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-8, 2007, : 1971 - 1975
  • [8] Majority Voting based Classification of Thyroid Carcinoma
    Gopinath, B.
    Gupta, B. R.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION ON BIOMETRICS TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 2 : 265 - 271
  • [9] Majority voting in a model of means testing
    Cardak, Buly A.
    Glomm, Gerhard
    Ravikumar, B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2020, 122
  • [10] PARADOX OF VOTING UNDER AN URN MODEL - THE EFFECT OF HOMOGENEITY
    BERG, S
    [J]. PUBLIC CHOICE, 1985, 47 (02) : 377 - 387