Repurposing the power injectable peripherally inserted central catheter as a tunnelled, non-cuffed, centrally inserted central venous catheter in oncological patients for short- to mid-term vascular access: A pilot study

被引:3
|
作者
Low, Xi Zhen [1 ]
Tay, Kiang Hiong [1 ]
Leong, Sum [1 ]
Lo, Richard Hoau Gong [1 ]
Zhuang, Kun Da [1 ]
Chua, Jasmine Ming Er [1 ]
Too, Chow Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Gen Hosp, SingHlth Duke NUS Acad Med Ctr, Dept Vasc & Intervent Radiol, Div Radiol Sci,Radiol Sci Acad Clin Programme, Outram Rd, Singapore 169608, Singapore
来源
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS | 2021年 / 22卷 / 03期
关键词
Oncology; central venous catheter; peripherally inserted central catheter; novel technique; INFANTS; PICC;
D O I
10.1177/1129729820943449
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objectives: Usual short- to mid-term vascular accesses for oncologic patients include the peripherally inserted central catheter and non-tunnelled centrally inserted central catheters, inserted in the supraclavicular or infraclavicular area. Peripherally inserted central catheters can be restrictive in active patients; supraclavicular non-tunnelled centrally inserted central catheters are not ideal in terms of exit site location and cosmesis, while infraclavicular non-tunnelled centrally inserted central catheters may be associated with puncture-related complications. In this pilot study, we have evaluated the off-label use of peripherally inserted central catheters as a tunnelled supraclavicular centrally inserted central catheter. Methods: Ten patients were recruited for this prospective study. A non-cuffed, power injectable peripherally inserted central catheter was inserted via a short subcutaneous tunnel into the internal jugular vein using the peel-away sheath and introducer as a tunneller. Puncture wounds were closed with tissue glue. Patients were followed up for comfort scores, dwell time and complications. Results: The median dwell time was 94 days (mean of 113 days). One catheter was removed due to systemic fungemia, resulting in an acceptable complication rate of 0.97 per 1000 catheter days.Mean patient-reported comfort scores was 16 (out of 20). Pressurised injections for computer tomography imaging were performed in five patients without complications. Conclusion: Despite limited numbers, this method appears to be safe and well accepted with low complication rates. This modified vascular access is low profile, easily concealed, readily removable and compatible with pressure injector and uses a commonly found catheter in a modified fashion. Larger prospective trials will be needed to ascertain if it can be a standard of care for oncological patients.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 461
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing catheter related bloodstream infection rate between cuffed tunnelled and non-cuffed tunnelled peripherally inserted central catheter
    Sze Yong, Teoh
    Vijayanathan, Anushya A. P.
    Chung, Eric
    Ng, Wei Lin
    Yaakup, Nur Adura
    Sulaiman, Norshazriman
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2022, 23 (02): : 225 - 231
  • [2] Centrally inserted tunnelled peripherally inserted central catheter: Off-label use for venous access in oncology patients
    Lingegowda, Dayananda
    Gehani, Anisha
    Sen, Saugata
    Mukhopadhyay, Sumit
    Ghosh, Priya
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2020, 21 (05): : 773 - 777
  • [3] Outcomes of tunnelled cuffed centrally inserted central catheter removal: A retrospective cohort study
    Borello, Eloise
    Egan, Sarah
    Dale, Stephanie
    Barlow, Alie
    Hu, Yanhong Jessika
    Brasher, Christopher
    Oakley, Ed
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2024, 71 (12)
  • [4] PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETER FOR LONG-TERM VASCULAR ACCESS IN PATIENTS WITH HEMORRHAGIC SYNDROME
    Spirin, M., V
    Galstyan, G. M.
    Polevodova, O. A.
    Kudlay, D. A.
    Polyanskaya, T. Yu
    Zozulya, N., I
    Likhacheva, E. A.
    Troitskaya, V. V.
    GEMATOLOGIYA I TRANSFUZIOLOGIYA, 2017, 62 (04): : 203 - 210
  • [5] Comparative study of peripherally inserted central venous catheters and traditional central catheter in surgical patients
    于健春
    王秀荣
    蒋朱明
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2000, (04) : 26 - 26
  • [6] Comparative study of peripherally inserted central venous catheters and traditional central catheter in surgical patients
    Yu, JC
    Wang, XR
    Jiang, ZM
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 113 (04) : 314 - 314
  • [7] Comparative study of peripherally inserted central venous catheters and traditional central catheter in surgical patients
    于健春
    王秀荣
    蒋朱明
    ChineseMedicalJournal, 2000, (04)
  • [8] Power Injectable Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter Lines Frequently Flip After Power Injection of Contrast
    Lozano, Luis Antonio Sosa
    Marn, Charles
    Goodman, Lawrence R.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2012, 36 (04) : 427 - 430
  • [9] The power peripherally inserted central catheter is superior to a central venous catheter in management of patients with esophageal variceal bleeding undergoing devascularization
    Jing, Wen
    Rong, He
    Li, Jiang
    Xia, Zhang Hai
    Yu, Zhang Hong
    Ke, Zhang
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 66 (10) : S59 - S61
  • [10] Comparison between peripherally inserted central venous catheters and short-term central venous catheter in patients discharged from the ICU
    S Batacchi
    G Zagli
    S diValvasone
    M Ciapetti
    G Cianchi
    V Tucci
    G Martini
    M Mostardini
    S Proietti
    A Peris
    Critical Care, 14 (Suppl 1):