Geological uncertainties associated with 3-D subsurface models

被引:62
|
作者
Tacher, L [1 ]
Pomian-Srzednicki, I [1 ]
Parriaux, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Engn & Environm Geol Lab, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
uncertainties; 3-D geological models; engineering geology;
D O I
10.1016/j.cageo.2005.06.010
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Subsurface models are generally built from both subjective interpretation and mathematical interpolation/ extrapolation techniques. These models are therefore uncertain, but their uncertainty is rarely expressed in a geological forecast. In this paper, an evaluation method of geological uncertainties related to 3-D subsurface models is proposed and tested on a real case. This method is based on the subsurface model, which is considered the most probable prediction (best guess). The various geological interfaces are handled as Gaussian random fields to which a model of spatial variability describing possible fluctuations around the best guess is applied. Several structural constraints, such as the shape of folds and thickness of layers are accounted for in the model. At this point, the local variance can be estimated throughout the study area by application of the simple kriging technique. Finally, the variability is converted into probabilities of occurrence of the various rock masses present in the study area. The probabilities are calculated according to intersection rules governing the stratigraphic sequence of the subsurface model. They enable one to probabilistically model subsurface structures in the form of a three-dimensional (3-D) probability field. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 221
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 3-D Structural geological models: Concepts, methods, and uncertainties
    Wellmann, Florian
    Caumon, Guillaume
    [J]. ADVANCES IN GEOPHYSICS, VOL 59, 2018, 59 : 1 - 121
  • [2] Uncertainties have a meaning: Information entropy as a quality measure for 3-D geological models
    Wellmann, J. Florian
    Regenauer-Lieb, Klaus
    [J]. TECTONOPHYSICS, 2012, 526 : 207 - 216
  • [3] Actors, actions, and uncertainties: optimizing decision-making based on 3-D structural geological models
    Stamm, Fabian
    de la Varga, Miguel
    Wellmann, Florian
    [J]. SOLID EARTH, 2019, 10 (06) : 2015 - 2043
  • [4] Resolution and uncertainty in lithospheric 3-D geological models
    Snyder, David B.
    Schetselaar, Ernst
    Pilkington, Mark
    Schaeffer, Andrew J.
    [J]. MINERALOGY AND PETROLOGY, 2018, 112 : 133 - 147
  • [5] Resolution and uncertainty in lithospheric 3-D geological models
    David B. Snyder
    Ernst Schetselaar
    Mark Pilkington
    Andrew J. Schaeffer
    [J]. Mineralogy and Petrology, 2018, 112 : 133 - 147
  • [6] Uncertainty assessment in 3-D geological models of increasing complexity
    Schweizer, Daniel
    Blum, Philipp
    Butscher, Christoph
    [J]. SOLID EARTH, 2017, 8 (02) : 515 - 530
  • [7] RAY-TRACING IN COMPLEX 3-D GEOLOGICAL MODELS
    GJOYSTDAL, H
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 1980, 45 (04) : 569 - 569
  • [8] 3-D GEOLOGICAL MODELING
    PHILLIPS, DC
    [J]. GEOTIMES, 1993, 38 (07): : 14 - 16
  • [9] Presenting 3-D models of geological materials on the World Wide Web
    Marschallinger, R
    Johnson, SE
    [J]. COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2001, 27 (04) : 467 - 476
  • [10] Segmentally iterative ray tracing in 3-D heterogeneous geological models
    Li Fei
    Xu Tao
    Wu Zhen-Bo
    Zhang Zhong-Jie
    Teng Ji-Wen
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2013, 56 (10): : 3514 - 3522