Carbon sequestration potential by afforestation of marginal agricultural land in the Midwestern US

被引:89
|
作者
Niu, XZ [1 ]
Duiker, SW [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
carbon sequestration; afforestation; marginal agricultural land; MRCSP;
D O I
10.1016/j.foreco.2005.12.044
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Carbon sequestration has been well recognized as a viable option to slow the rise in atmospheric greenhouse gas concentration. The main goals of this study were to assess the carbon sequestration potential (CSP) by afforestation of marginal agricultural land (MagLand) and to identify hotspots for potential afforestation activities in the U.S. Midwest region (Michigan (MT), Indiana (IN), Ohio, Kentucky (KY), West Virginia, Pennsylvania (PA) and Maryland (MD)). The 1992 USGS National Land Cover Dataset and the State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) database were used to determine MagLand. Two forest types (coniferous and deciduous) and two management practices (short-rotation versus permanent forest) were combined to form four afforestation scenarios. Simulation models were employed to predict changes in four carbon pools: aboveground biomass, roots, forest floor, and soil organic carbon (SOC). A scenario-generating tool was developed to detect the hotspots. We estimated that there was a total of 6.5 million hectares (Mha) MagLand available in the U.S. Midwest region, which accounts for approximately 24% of the regional total agricultural land. The CSP capacity was predicted to be 508-540 Tg C (1 Tg = 10(12) g) over 20 years and 1018-1080 Tg C over 50 years. The results indicate that afforestation of MagLand could offset 6-8% of current CO2 emissions by combustion of fossil fuel in the region. This analysis showed only slight differences in carbon sequestration between forest types or between short-rotation and permanent forest scenarios. Note that this calculation assumed that all suitable MagLand in the U.S. Midwest region was converted to forest and that "best carbon management" was adopted. The actual CSP could be less if the economical and social factors are taken into account. The most preferred locations for implementing the afforestation strategy were found to be concentrated along a west-cast axis across the southern parts of Indiana, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, as well as in an area covering southern Michigan and northern parts of Indiana and Ohio. Overall, we conclude that afforestation of MagLand in the Midwest U.S. region offers great potential for carbon sequestration. Future studies are needed to evaluate its economic feasibility, social acceptability, and operation capability. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 427
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Marginal cost of carbon sequestration through forest afforestation of agricultural land in the southeastern United States
    Obembe, Oladipo S.
    Hendricks, Nathan P.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 53 : 59 - 73
  • [2] Additional carbon sequestration potential of abandoned agricultural land afforestation in the boreal zone: A modelling approach
    Fradette, Olivier
    Marty, Charles
    Faubert, Patrick
    Dessureault, Pierre-Luc
    Pare, Maxime
    Bouchard, Sylvie
    Villeneuve, Claude
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 499
  • [3] Comparison of carbon sequestration potential in agricultural and afforestation farming systems
    Lin, Chinsu
    Lin, Chun-Hsiung
    [J]. SCIENTIA AGRICOLA, 2013, 70 (02): : 93 - 101
  • [4] Permanence of agricultural afforestation for carbon sequestration under stylized carbon markets in the.US
    Haim, David
    White, Eric M.
    Alig, Ralph J.
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2014, 41 : 12 - 21
  • [5] Improved modelling of carbon sequestration potential on agricultural land
    Frank, Stefan
    Augustynczik, Andrey Lessa Derci
    [J]. NATURE FOOD, 2024,
  • [6] Carbon sequestration by forests and soils on mined land in the Midwestern and Appalachian coalfields of the US
    Amichev, Beyhan Y.
    Burger, James A.
    Rodrigue, Jason A.
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 256 (11) : 1949 - 1959
  • [7] Estimating carbon sequestration potential on US agricultural topsoils
    Sperow, Mark
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2016, 155 : 390 - 400
  • [8] Estimating carbon supply curves from afforestation of agricultural land in the Northeastern US
    Winsten, Jonathan
    Walker, Sarah
    Brown, Sandra
    Grimland, Sean
    [J]. MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2011, 16 (08) : 925 - 942
  • [9] Updated potential soil carbon sequestration rates on US agricultural land based on the 2019 IPCC guidelines
    Sperow, Mark
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2020, 204
  • [10] The Carbon Sequestration Potential of Degraded Agricultural Land in the Amhara Region of Ethiopia
    Belay, Beyene
    Poetzelsberger, Elisabeth
    Hasenauer, Hubert
    [J]. FORESTS, 2018, 9 (08):