Steady-state pharmacokinetic comparison of a new, extended-release, once-daily morphine formulation, Avinza™, and a twice-daily controlled-release morphine formulation in patients with chronic moderate-to-severe pain

被引:35
|
作者
Portenoy, RK
Sciberras, A
Eliot, L
Loewen, G
Butler, J
Devane, J
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Pain Med & Palliat Care, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Ligand Pharmaceut Inc, San Diego, CA USA
[3] Elan Pharmaceut Technol, Athlone, Ireland
关键词
pharmacokinetics; pharmacodynamics; morphine sulfate; chronic pain; sustained-release formulations;
D O I
10.1016/S0885-3924(02)00382-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Exlended-release morphine formulations are widely used in the management of chronic pain. Avinza(TM) (morphine sulfate extended-release [MSER, Morphelan(TM)])) is a new, once-a-day, extended-release morphine formulation designed to reach target concentrations rapidly and maintain concentrations throughout a 24-hour period. The primary objective of this study was to compare the 24-hour, steady-state pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of morphine and its metabolites (morphine-6-glucuronide [M6G] and morphine-3-glucuronide [M3G]) following ingestion of MSER once-a-day and MS Contin(R) (controlled-release morphine sulfate [CRM]) twice-a-day in patients with chronic moderate-to-severe pain. Ten patients with chronic moderate-to-severe pain were recruited into an open-label, multiple-dose, nonrandomized, two-period, single-center study. All patients were stabilized for a minimum of 7 days on a twice-daily dose of CRM associated with an optimal balance between pain control and side efffects of 10 days. Twenty four hour steady-state PK profiles were obtained on the last day of each normalized to a 100-mg total daily dose prior to statistical analysis. Nine of the 10 patients completed the entire study. MSER and CPLM demonstrated similar bioavailability (AUC) of morphine and its metabolites. Compared to CRM, MSER demonstrated a 19% lower maximum concentration (C-max), a 66% higher minimum concentration (C-min), and a 44% lower peak-to-trough fluctuation (%FI) over the 24-hour period. In addition, MSER maintained concentrations above 50% and 75% of the C-max longer than CRM. Clinical efficacy and safe were comparable for MSER and CRM. Once-daily MSER approaches maximum morphine concentration more quickly, approximates maximum concentration longer, and demonstrates less fluctuation in morphine concentration during a 24-hour period than CRM dosed twice daily. The pharmacodynamic implications of this profile deserve further study. (C) U.S. Cancer-Pain Relief Committee, 2002.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 300
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Pharmacokinetic evaluation of a sprinkle-dose regimen of a once-daily, extended-release morphine formulation
    Eliot, L
    Butler, J
    Devane, J
    Loewen, G
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 24 (02) : 260 - 268
  • [3] Extended-Release, Once-Daily Morphine (Avinza) for the Treatment of Chronic Nonmalignant Pain: Effect on Pain, Depressive Symptoms, and Cognition
    Panjabi, Sumeet S.
    Panjabi, Ravi S.
    Shepherd, Marvin D.
    Lawson, Kenneth A.
    Johnsrud, Michael
    Barner, Jamie
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2008, 9 (08) : 985 - 993
  • [4] Twice-daily versus once-daily morphine sulphate controlled-release suppositories for the treatment of cancer pain - A randomized controlled trial
    Bruera, E
    Belzile, M
    Neumann, CM
    Ford, I
    Harsanyi, Z
    Darke, A
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 1999, 7 (04) : 280 - 283
  • [5] Twice-daily versus once-daily morphine sulphate controlled-release suppositories for the treatment of cancer pain A randomized controlled trial
    Eduardo Bruera
    Michelle Belzile
    Catherine M. Neumann
    I. Ford
    Zoltan Harsanyi
    Andrew Darke
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 1999, 7 : 280 - 283
  • [6] Steady-state pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine when converting from a twice-daily immediate-release to a once-daily extended-release formulation in subjects with epilepsy (The COMPASS Study)
    Tompson, Debra J.
    Ali, Imran
    Oliver-Willwong, Ruth
    Job, Sarah
    Zhu, Li
    Lemme, Francesca
    Hammer, Anne E.
    Vuong, Alain
    Messenheimer, John A.
    EPILEPSIA, 2008, 49 (03) : 410 - 417
  • [7] A Bioequivalence Comparison at Steady State between the Newly Developed Once-Daily Extended Release Tablet Formulation and the Approved Twice-Daily Tablet Formulation of Deutetrabenazine
    Sunzel, Eva-Maria
    Rabinovich-Guilatt, Laura
    Iyengar, Malini
    Ruffo, Debra
    Gutierrez, Maria
    Gordon, Mark Forrest
    Ghibellini, Giulia
    NEUROLOGY, 2023, 100 (17)
  • [8] Efficacy and safety of long-term, once-daily morphine sulfate extended-release capsules in cancer patients with chronic, moderate-to-severe pain
    Groves, ES
    Shelby, SM
    Schlosser, L
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (14) : 747S - 747S
  • [9] A Bioequivalence Comparison Between the Once-Daily Extended-Release Tablet and the Twice-Daily Tablet Formulations of Deutetrabenazine at Steady State
    Sunzel, Eva-Maria
    Rabinovich-Guilatt, Laura
    Iyengar, Malini
    Ruffo, Debra
    Birajdar, Nagnath G.
    Loupe, Pippa
    Gutierrez, Maria
    Gordon, Mark Forrest
    Ghibellini, Giulia
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 13 (03): : 224 - 232
  • [10] Sustained Safety and Efficacy of Once-Daily Hydromorphone Extended-Release (OROS® hydromorphone ER) Compared with Twice-Daily Oxycodone Controlled-Release Over 52 Weeks in Patients with Moderate to Severe Chronic Noncancer Pain
    Richarz, Ute
    Waechter, Sandra
    Sabatowski, Rainer
    Szczepanski, Leszek
    Binsfeld, Heinrich
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2013, 13 (01) : 30 - 40