Comparison of multi-criteria scheduling techniques

被引:21
|
作者
Klusacek, Dalibor [1 ]
Rudova, Hana [1 ]
Baraglia, Ranieri [2 ]
Pasquali, Marco [2 ,3 ]
Capannini, Gabriele [2 ]
机构
[1] Masaryk Univ, Fac Informat, Bot 68A, Brno, Czech Republic
[2] ISTI, Pisa, Italy
[3] IMT Lucca, Inst Adv Studies, Lucca, Italy
关键词
grid; scheduling; dispatching rule; local search; backfilling;
D O I
10.1007/978-0-387-09457-1_15
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a novel schedule-based approach for scheduling a continuous stream of batch jobs on the machines of a computational Grid. Our new solutions represented by dispatching rule Earliest Gap-Earliest Deadline First (EG-EDF) and Tabu search are based on the idea of filling gaps in the existing schedule. EG-EDF rule is able to build the schedule for all jobs incrementally by applying technique which fills earliest existing gaps in the schedule with newly arriving jobs. If no gap for a coming job is available EG-EDF rule uses Earliest Deadline First (EDF) strategy for including new job into the existing schedule. Such schedule is then optimized using the Tabu search algorithm moving jobs into earliest gaps again. Scheduling choices are taken to meet the Quality of Service (QoS) requested by the submitted jobs, and to optimize the usage of hardware resources. We compared the proposed solution with some of the most common queue-based scheduling algorithms like FCFS, EASY backfilling, and Flexible backfilling. Experiments shows that EG-EDF rule is able to compute good assignments, often with shorter algorithm runtime w.r.t. the other queue-based algorithms. Further Tabu search optimization results in higher QoS and machine usage while keeping the algorithm runtime reasonable.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Numerical Comparison of Multi-criteria Decision-making Techniques: A Simulation on Flood Management Multi-criteria Systems
    Sabzi, Hamed Zamani
    King, James Phillip
    [J]. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2015: Floods, Droughts, and Ecosystems, 2015, : 359 - 373
  • [2] A comparison of two multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Akhavi, F
    Hayes, C
    [J]. 2003 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 956 - 961
  • [3] Comparison among Some Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Techniques
    Bandyopadhyay, Susmita
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION AND SECURITY (ICCCS-2020), 2020,
  • [4] Comparison of multi-criteria optimisation techniques for selection of conservation areas
    Strange, N
    Brukas, V
    Helles, F
    Tarp, P
    [J]. RECENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS IN APPLIED FOREST ECONOMICS RESEARCH, 2003, 74 : 91 - 102
  • [5] Multi-criteria Scheduling of Pipeline Workflows
    Benoit, Anne
    Rehn-Sonigo, Veronika
    Robert, Yves
    [J]. 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLUSTER COMPUTING, 2007, : 515 - 524
  • [6] Multi-criteria approach for dynamic scheduling
    Singh, A.
    Mehta, N. K.
    Jain, P. K.
    [J]. Annals of DAAAM for 2004 & Proceedings of the 15th International DAAAM Symposium: INTELLIGNET MANUFACTURING & AUTOMATION: GLOBALISATION - TECHNOLOGY - MEN - NATURE, 2004, : 419 - 420
  • [7] A new approach for multi-criteria scheduling
    Smutnicki, Czeslaw
    Pempera, Jaroslaw
    Rudy, Jaroslaw
    Zelazny, Dominik
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 90 : 212 - 220
  • [8] Comparison among multi-criteria decision analysis techniques: a novel method
    Bandyopadhyay, Susmita
    [J]. PROGRESS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 10 (02) : 195 - 216
  • [9] Comparison among multi-criteria decision analysis techniques: a novel method
    Susmita Bandyopadhyay
    [J]. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 2021, 10 : 195 - 216
  • [10] Automatic Speech Recognition Features Extraction Techniques: A Multi-criteria Comparison
    Labied, Maria
    Belangour, Abdessamad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 12 (08) : 177 - 182