Duinefontein 2: an Acheulean Site in the Western Cape Province of South Africa

被引:51
|
作者
Klein, RG [1 ]
Avery, G
Cruz-Uribe, K
Halkett, D
Hart, T
Milo, RG
Volman, TP
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Anthropol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] S African Museum, Dept Archaeol, ZA-8000 Cape Town, South Africa
[3] No Arizona Univ, Dept Anthropol, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[4] Univ Cape Town, Off Contract Archaeol, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa
[5] Chicago State Univ, Dept Geog Econ & Anthropol, Chicago, IL 60628 USA
[6] Cornell Univ, Dept Anthropol, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Duinefontein; 2; Acheulean tradition; Paleolithic ecology; hunting and scavenging;
D O I
10.1006/jhev.1999.0307
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
Excavations at Duinefontein (DFT) 2 near Cape Town, South Africa have recovered numerous stone artefacts and animal bones on an ancient surface sealed within iron-stained eolian sands. U-series analysis of an overlying calcrete places the sands before 150 ka ago, while the large mammal taxa imply an age between 400 and 200 ka ago. The artefacts include a classic Acheulean handaxe and probable biface shaping flakes that support this age estimate. The principal mammalian species are long-homed buffalo, black wilde-beest, greater kudu, Cape zebra, and grysbok/steenbok, which imply a grass-and-bush mosaic instead of the historic small-leafed shrubland. Hippopotamus and reedbuck indicate that water stood nearby, probably in dune swales. The large mammal bones are mostly vertebrae and other axial elements, often in near-anatomical order. Both proximal and distal appendicular elements are rare. Bones with carnivore damage are common, but ones with stone tool marks are scarce. The sum suggests a water-edge attritional death site where people played a minimal role and carcasses were disarticulated mainly by carnivore feeding and by trampling. Stone tool marks tend to be equally rare at other Acheulean attritional death sites, and the implication may be that Acheulean people rarely obtained large mammals, whether by hunting or scavenging. Human scavengers at DFT2 would not have encountered a disproportionate number of distal (versus proximal) limb elements, and it follows that the tendency for distal elements to dominate many archeological assemblages need not reflect scavenging versus hunting. Even if DFT2 was not itself a locus of intense human activity, it provides useful baseline for evaluating bone damage, skeletal part representation, and other variables at sites where people were deeply involved. (C) 1999 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 190
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条