How might Australian rainforest cloud interception respond to climate change?

被引:4
|
作者
Wallace, Jim [1 ,2 ]
McJannet, Dave [3 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ, Ctr Trop Water & Aquat Ecosyst Res TropWATER, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
[2] CSIRO Land & Water, Australian Trop Sci & Innovat Precinct, Townsville, Qld 4814, Australia
[3] CSIRO Land & Water, EcoSci Precinct, Dutton Pk, Qld 4120, Australia
关键词
Rainforest; Climate change; Cloud interception; Canopy wetness; PRECIPITATION INTERCEPTION; NORTHERN QUEENSLAND; WATER DEPOSITION; THROUGHFALL; STEMFLOW; IMPACTS; COASTAL; BALANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.028
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The lower and upper montane rainforests in northern Queensland receive significant amounts of cloud interception that affect both in situ canopy wetness and downstream runoff. Cloud interception contributes 5-30% of the annual water input to the canopy and this increases to 40-70% of the monthly water input during the dry season. This occult water is therefore an important input to the canopy, sustaining the epiphytes, mosses and other species that depend on wet canopy conditions. The potential effect of climate change on cloud interception was examined using the relationship between cloud interception and cloud frequency derived from measurements made at four different rainforest locations. Any given change in cloud frequency produces a greater change in cloud interception and this 'amplification' increases from 1.1 to 1.7 as cloud frequency increases from 5% to 70%. This means that any changes in cloud frequency will have the greatest relative effects at the higher altitude sites where cloud interception is greatest. As cloud frequency is also a major factor affecting canopy wetness, any given change in cloud frequency will therefore have a greater impact on canopy wetness at the higher altitude sites. These changes in wetness duration will augment those due to changes in rainfall and may have important implications for the fauna and flora that depend on wet canopy conditions. We also found that the Australian rainforests may be more efficient (by similar to 50% on average) in intercepting cloud water than American coniferous forests, which may be due to differences in canopy structure and exposure at the different sites. (c) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 95
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The potential impacts of climate change on Australian subtropical rainforest
    Laidlaw, M. J.
    McDonald, W. J. F.
    Hunter, R. John
    Putland, D. A.
    Kitching, R. L.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2011, 59 (05) : 440 - 449
  • [2] How will Newcastle and the Hunter respond to climate change?
    Proust, Tony
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN PLANNER, 2009, 46 (03) : 12 - 13
  • [3] How climate change might affect tea
    Anna Nowogrodzki
    [J]. Nature, 2019, 566 (7742) : S10 - S11
  • [4] The debate: How do we respond to climate change?
    Avery, Christopher
    Pence, Laura
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 250
  • [5] How Members of Parliament understand and respond to climate change
    Willis, Rebecca
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2018, 66 (03): : 475 - 491
  • [6] How should a small country respond to climate change?
    Haymet, A. D. J.
    [J]. CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS, 2023, 26 (03)
  • [7] Coping with change: A framework for environmental signals and how neuroendocrine pathways might respond
    Wingfield, John C.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 37 : 89 - 96
  • [8] Climate Change: How Should the World Heritage Convention Respond?
    Terrill, Greg
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HERITAGE STUDIES, 2008, 14 (05) : 388 - 404
  • [9] How Do Fungi Survive in the Sea and Respond to Climate Change?
    Jones, E. B. Gareth
    Ramakrishna, Sundari
    Vikineswary, Sabaratnam
    Das, Diptosh
    Bahkali, Ali H.
    Guo, Sheng-Yu
    Pang, Ka-Lai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FUNGI, 2022, 8 (03)
  • [10] How will the tundra-taiga interface respond to climate change?
    Skre, O
    Baxter, R
    Crawford, RMM
    Callaghan, TV
    Fedorkov, A
    [J]. AMBIO, 2002, : 37 - 46